StoneToss / Red Panels -

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Although it isn't exactly a virtue, men don't ruin their romantic chances by anywhere near the same degree by having lots of partners.

Yes they do. It's called cheating, there was a whole website dedicated to cheating on your spouse that leaked all user info four years ago, it was called Ashley Madison.

 

[redcent]

To quote the great philosopher Patrice O Neal, you can't go "what about men" for everything.

What can I say? Turnabout is fair play. Who doesn't like equality?

After all, why can a bunch of incels mope about not getting laid constantly yet if a girl tries getting laid she's a terrible person?

If women are supposed to be pure little virgin flowers all the time why don't the incels set an example and shut about getting laid themselves?

Although it isn't exactly a virtue, men don't ruin their romantic chances by anywhere near the same degree by having lots of partners. It even is a trope of romantic books aimed at women to tie down a player. There are also ways for men to vastly reduce their romantic chances, but promiscuity is not one of the prominent ones.

No.

They don't.

What does ruin their romantic chances?

Spoiler: this shit

I mean, who the fuck wants to marry some guy who only sees a woman's value is if she's used or not, like she's something to be owned or brought for use? Maybe some other woman? This kind of thing though is a red flag to me

 

[Lemmingwise]

Yes they do. It's called cheating, there was a whole website dedicated to cheating on your spouse that leaked all user info four years ago, it was called Ashley Madison.

There's a huge difference between cheating/betraying your spouse and having a history of promiscuity. Why are you even trying to compare such different things?

What can I say? Turnabout is fair play. Who doesn't like equality?

After all, why can a bunch of incels mope about not getting laid constantly yet if a girl tries getting laid she's a terrible person?

If women are supposed to be pure little virgin flowers all the time why don't the incels set an example and shut about getting laid themselves?



No.

They don't.

What does ruin their romantic chances?

Spoiler: this shit

I mean, who the fuck wants to marry some guy who only sees a woman's value is if she's used or not, like she's something to be owned or brought for use? Maybe some other woman? This kind of thing though is a red flag to me

I don't know what you're even trying to say. That women should go against their natural instincts and dislike something about men more because that's what men seek in women? What kind of spiteful way is that to approach your lovelife?

I'm trying to understand where you're coming from, but I can't see anything else than it being a bitter baggage laden emotional response.

Oh....

This thing on your wall might explain it if it's about you. Looks like I'm right on the money.

edit: ahh yes, it is about you:

Imagine feeling threatened by a bunch of impotent incels. The lady doth protest too much. If you really didn't want men, you wouldn't care so much about this subject.

 

[redcent]

I don't know what you're even trying to say. That women should go against their natural instincts and dislike something about men more because that's what men seek in women? What kind of spiteful way is that to approach your lovelife?

This question doesn't even make sense. "natural instincts" is ...what? "Dislike something about men".....is what? Quit being vague.

I'm trying to understand where you're coming from, but I can't see anything else than it being a bitter baggage laden emotional response.

So?

Some people are hypocritical. Other people get upset about it. Does that make hypocrisy right?

Oh....

This thing on your wall might explain it if it's about you. Looks like I'm right on the money.

View attachment 882290

...and that money is......? I'm curious now.
EDIT;

Imagine feeling threatened by a bunch of impotent incels. The lady doth protest too much. If you really didn't want men, you wouldn't care so much about this subject.

....Not care? Do you have any idea how many rape apologists are in the incel thread alone?

 

[TaimuRadiu]

What can I say? Turnabout is fair play. Who doesn't like equality?

After all, why can a bunch of incels mope about not getting laid constantly yet if a girl tries getting laid she's a terrible person?

If women are supposed to be pure little virgin flowers all the time why don't the incels set an example and shut about getting laid themselves?



No.

They don't.

What does ruin their romantic chances?

Spoiler: this shit

I mean, who the fuck wants to marry some guy who only sees a woman's value is if she's used or not, like she's something to be owned or brought for use? Maybe some other woman? This kind of thing though is a red flag to me

So did he just dutch oven his girlfriend repeatedly, is he some kind of swinger, what

 

[Lemmingwise]

So did he just dutch oven his girlfriend repeatedly, is he some kind of swinger, what

He means ejaculated, not farted.

After all, why can a bunch of incels mope about not getting laid constantly yet if a girl tries getting laid she's a terrible person?

This question doesn't even make sense. "natural instincts" is ...what? "Dislike something about men".....is what? Quit being vague.


So?

Some people are hypocritical. Other people get upset about it. Does that make hypocrisy right?



...and that money is......? I'm curious now.
EDIT;
....Not care? Do you have any idea how many rape apologists are in the incel thread alone?

Look it's very simple. I described an asymmetry between what men seek in women and what women seek in men (for long term partners). You suggested that women start modifying what they seek in men, and go against their unmodified desires, simply to attain "equality". You called it turnabout, but if you look your motive, it's really just a kind of revenge. It's like men deciding to only want to date rich women because on average, women prefer richer partners. It would be this weird kind of revenge. And if you wanna do that, be my guest, you're never going to convince at most a handful of people to go against their own interests anyways.

I'm on the money because the comic hit home to you. You're 37 and you missed the boat. So now you try to convince yourself that you didn't want to get on the boat. You tell the lie that you don't want men to want you. And you know what, I feel you, it's probably a tough place to be.

You can see it right here:

I mean, who the fuck wants to marry some guy who only sees a woman's value is if she's used or not, like she's something to be owned or brought for use? Maybe some other woman? This kind of thing though is a red flag to me

You're saying men who aren't interested in you are a red flag. No shit. You can't reject men who weren't interested in you in the first place.

 

[meinhausinneuberlin]

He means ejaculated, not farted.




Look it's very simple. I described an asymmetry between what men seek in women and what women seek in men (for long term partners). You suggested that women start modifying what they seek in men, and go against their unmodified desires, simply to attain "equality". You called it turnabout, but if you look your motive, it's really just a kind of revenge. It's like men deciding to only want to date rich women because on average, women prefer richer partners. It would be this weird kind of revenge. And if you wanna do that, be my guest, you're never going to convince at most a handful of people to go against their own interests anyways.

I'm on the money because the comic hit home to you. You're 37 and you missed the boat. So now you try to convince yourself that you didn't want to get on the boat. You tell the lie that you don't want men to want you. And you know what, I feel you, it's probably a tough place to be.

You can see it right here:



You're saying men who aren't interested in you are a red flag. No shit. You can't reject men who weren't interested in you in the first place.

This question doesn't even make sense. "natural instincts" is ...what? "Dislike something about men".....is what? Quit being vague.


So?

Some people are hypocritical. Other people get upset about it. Does that make hypocrisy right?



...and that money is......? I'm curious now.
EDIT;
....Not care? Do you have any idea how many rape apologists are in the incel thread alone?

OH MAN BOYS WE GOT OURSELVES SOME SPERGING also to be tbh stefan molymeme probably does this better

 

[MetalParakeet]

Came here for stonetoss, stayed for the 2 pages of sperging

 

[Haramburger]

Here's your August 6th comic, juden:

Also relevant, Stonetoss is on the Yaniv train now. Wave, everybody, you know he's browsing!

 

[meinhausinneuberlin]

Here's your August 6th comic, juden:
View attachment 882774

Also relevant, Stonetoss is on the Vaniv train now. Wave, everybody, you know he's browsing!
View attachment 882810

explain what you mean by "Here's your August 6th comic, juden:" is there some kind of inside joke or something

 

[Doctor Placebo]

explain what you mean by "Here's your August 6th comic, juden:" is there some kind of inside joke or something

This thread was a triumph.

 

[redcent]

Look it's very simple. I described an asymmetry between what men seek in women and what women seek in men (for long term partners). You suggested that women start modifying what they seek in men, and go against their unmodified desires, simply to attain "equality".

Modify? What?

Just, what?

Incels are the ones saying women can't even look at Chad or else she's "hypergamous slut" yet go on about how much they want sex. They're the ones trying to modify that women even get the right in seeking men at all. I ask, if women should be made to do that, how is it fair when men aren't getting "modified" as you put it?

Or if you want to stay on track of this comic specifically, why should a woman who has sex even once then if circumstances befall (partner breaks up, dies) or instead if she was even raped, why should she be seen as a terrible thing while men can go around fucking around without a hint of shame?

You called it turnabout, but if you look your motive, it's really just a kind of revenge. It's like men deciding to only want to date rich women because on average, women prefer richer partners. It would be this weird kind of revenge. And if you wanna do that, be my guest, you're never going to convince at most a handful of people to go against their own interests anyways.

I honestly think you've made a conclusion about my motives with very little information despite there being a pleothra of other information about me. Case in point;

I'm on the money because the comic hit home to you. You're 37 and you missed the boat. So now you try to convince yourself that you didn't want to get on the boat. You tell the lie that you don't want men to want you. And you know what, I feel you, it's probably a tough place to be.

Hahahaha



Right. That's the only reason anyone at all can ever get upset at a bunch of nutcases like incels who speak rape speak. Not because rape is horrific, not because of the hypocrisy of them wanting them to restrict women's rights while wanting to do the very thing they want to restrict women doing. ಠ_ಠ

God, if you see someone riled up by a bunch of men who see the only value of women as a cum tissue and think that's all about missing some boat, I just don't even. In fact, I don't understand how people can not get riled up by incels except through being an internet veteran and laughing at how insane it all is.

You're saying men who aren't interested in you are a red flag. No shit. You can't reject men who weren't interested in you in the first place.

"Men who aren't interested in me?" How in the world did you come to this conclusion? The hell?

No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying men who only want to use woman like say a car, a computer, or the oft heard phrase I hear, "a piece of meat" are red flags. This is incel talk.

OH MAN BOYS WE GOT OURSELVES SOME SPERGING also to be tbh stefan molymeme probably does this better

Point taken. Should this be taken outside?

 

[Haramburger]

In fact, I don't understand how people can not get riled up by incels except through being an internet veteran and laughing at how insane it all is.

The purpose of this site is to laugh at ______, not form an autistic militia to end their ill-perceived "threat." Bench your irrational feelings. Or keep sperging about it publicly, that's a better show. You're just a single stone on Stonetoss' 5th-dimensional go board of total social media domination.

 

[Lemmingwise]

That's the only reason anyone at all can ever get upset at a bunch of nutcases like incels who speak rape speak

Where in this thread is there even anything even close to "rape speak"?

God, if you see someone riled up by a bunch of men who see the only value of women as a cum tissue and think that's all about missing some boat, I just don't even. In fact, I don't understand how people can not get riled up by incels

1. incels aren't men
2. just calm down, lol

 

[MetalParakeet]

Hey redcent, what's your tumblr page? I promise I won't tell anyone

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

There's a huge difference between cheating/betraying your spouse and having a history of promiscuity. Why are you even trying to compare such different things?

No, there's literally no difference, cheating on your marriage is the most promiscuous thing you could do.

 

[Lemmingwise]

No, there's literally no difference, cheating on your marriage is the most promiscuous thing you could do.

I just think you're talking about something completely different. What does this have to do with the comic we were talking about?

Whether you agree with the commentary of the comic or not, it was commentary on non-cheating promiscuity. That's the whole set-up of the comic.

 

[meinhausinneuberlin]

This thread was a triumph.

no seriously what does it mean if thats supposed to be the title of the comic then its wrong. The title of that comic is "grandmaster" http://archive.md/j3YUU
I can be an retard sometimes who misses what seems like very obvious things but I find stonetoss interesting and would like to know what the interesting bits mean besides the fact that Write for posterity is a good idea

 

[Lemmingwise]

no seriously what does it mean if thats supposed to be the title of the comic then its wrong. The title of that comic is "grandmaster" http://archive.md/j3YUU
I can be an exceptional individual sometimes who misses what seems like very obvious things but I find stonetoss interesting and would like to know what the interesting bits mean besides the fact that Write for posterity is a good idea

Think about that grandmaster title like this, it's as if you had this title:

 

[HG 400]

Think about that grandmaster title like this, it's as if you had this title:

How many more pages of this thread are you planning to shit your mad dumb faggotry all over?