Grey is a salt pillar on Twitter too, but she's not as spergy as Tara about it.I'd like to think there's an alternate universe where Grey DeLisle voiced Twilight Sparkle instead and the world is better for it.
Grey is a salt pillar on Twitter too, but she's not as spergy as Tara about it.I'd like to think there's an alternate universe where Grey DeLisle voiced Twilight Sparkle instead and the world is better for it.
Indeed. Chris is a notable example, but he is by no means unique. Here you have a woman who's successful, rich, and (by most standards) gorgeous, and she gets her kicks by riling up legions of internet bronyvirgins. It's not remarkable that Tara has this fandom, it's remarkable that she revels in it.I can see why this thread was moved. Because it's not just Tara strong but her white knights.
Aw man, why'd you have to go and ruin the fantasy like that?
There lies the problem, feminists are supposed to be above narcissism and objectification. I guess keyboard feminists are totally different. It's kind f weird, though, she doesn't even do that much live-acting.
Grey is a salt pillar on Twitter too, but she's not as spergy as Tara about it.
I always feel that certain "celebrities " that are involved with peoples' childhood and nostalgia, get away with saying stupid stuff and acting like a dummy.
A bit off topic, but look at JK Rowling, she sperges about Trump and refugees a lot and most of the time it's not even informative, just her ranting about how evil Trump can be. But because she created Harry Potter, she gets a pass on how she acts online.
It's the same with Tara Strong, she voiced a lot of memorable likable characters that people grew up with, so it becomes hard for people to separate the artist from the art.
Trump is their dad really.That explains why their fans are so forgiving, but why to the actors/authors themselves get so easily riled up? Is it because in a weird way, being connected to your childhood, they feel they have the ability or even obligation to tell you how to behave? As if they're a surrogate parent? And by voting for Drumpf/not being progressive enough, you are disappointing a "parental figure" in their eyes?
It's an extension of the idea that, because they're famous, celebrities assume people really want their opinions on everything, as opposed to just whatever show or band they were in. Also, just like some teachers start treating everyone they talk to like a student, some actors who focus on children as an audience start assuming that everyone in their fandom is young and impressionable.That explains why their fans are so forgiving, but why to the actors/authors themselves get so easily riled up? Is it because in a weird way, being connected to your childhood, they feel they have the ability or even obligation to tell you how to behave? As if they're a surrogate parent? And by voting for Drumpf/not being progressive enough, you are disappointing a "parental figure" in their eyes?
That explains why their fans are so forgiving, but why to the actors/authors themselves get so easily riled up? Is it because in a weird way, being connected to your childhood, they feel they have the ability or even obligation to tell you how to behave? As if they're a surrogate parent? And by voting for Drumpf/not being progressive enough, you are disappointing a "parental figure" in their eyes?
It's more along the lines of "this person is willfully alienating portions of their fanbase, the people who actually put them where they are, by shaming them based on who they voted for for president."REEEEE REEEEEEEE SOMEBODY DOESN'T WORSHIP TRUMP OMG THEY'RE SO SALTY THEY'RE SO SALTY I'M NOT THE SALTY ONE!!!! YOU'RE THE SALTY ONES!
It's more along the lines of "this person is willfully alienating portions of their fanbase, the people who actually put them where they are, by shaming them based on who they voted for for president."
Whatever their personal opinions are, it's guaranteed that a lot of their fans happened to support Trump, either because they actually liked him or because they thought Clinton was worse. Seems a bit ungrateful tbh.
So basically, you should immediately abandon all personal opinions the moment you're famous. You're not allowed to have opinions.
If you have fuck you money, you're allowed to have opinions. It is actually an incredibly tiny minority of morons who get so assblasted by the fact a "celebrity" has an opinion they disagree with that they actually boycott everything they're in.
Trump-is-literally-Hitler (as opposed to just being a really dumb guy who beat an evil cunt) is embarrassing, but unless your career is based on political astuteness, or the appearance of it, like Stephen Colbert, you actually aren't harming yourself that much by hating Trump. Most people do. Even a good chunk of his actual supporters don't really think he's that smart and just sort of semi-support him because they like the fact he pisses off people they hate even more.
I too would like to know the answer. I remember a few months ago when Christopher Sabat threw a tantrum because of Trump. And the Twitter feed of Jamie Marchi almost reads like John Flynt's.Why does it seem that voice actors go ten times as loony as regular ones, despite being only 1/10th as known to the public?
Nobody said anything about boycotting everything somebody's in. That's stupid.So basically, you should immediately abandon all personal opinions the moment you're famous. You're not allowed to have opinions.
If you have fuck you money, you're allowed to have opinions. It is actually an incredibly tiny minority of morons who get so assblasted by the fact a "celebrity" has an opinion they disagree with that they actually boycott everything they're in.