Idk man getting raped by some fucker then forced to get an abortion by a hanger down some dark alley doesn't sound like a choice, talk about if you collect enough documents to prove that you're raped or shit to be able to get into a restricted but clean clinicGood
Nothing wrong with people living dangerously through their own choices
Here we go.Idk man getting raped by some fucker then forced to get an abortion by a hanger down some dark alley doesn't sound like a choice, talk about if you collect enough documents to prove that you're raped or shit to be able to get into a restricted but clean clinic
What is there to confront? Taking care of an invalid 24/7 doesn't violate one's bodily autonomy.Exactly, which is why this is relevant. Why won't you confront this directly?
LOL, you scream about abortions due to rape being extremely rare, then have the audacity to pull this out of your ass?It's funny how the pro choice side never talks about the woman who gets an abortion to mess with the father's head or that it's some sick fetish.
Yes they did.You do realise that dark alley abortions never happened
"People are still going to rape, kill, and steal so let's just legalize it" lmaoWhether you're pro-life or choice or whatever, people are gonna still get abortions despite the ban and shit, which makes it more dangerous to an individual's life. By making it accessible there will be a better and safer environment for a woman to get an abortion, rat hoods, or just a little girl who got raped. This thread is just filled with people arguing about each others ethic and moral stands lol, but to be fair it's just better to allow people to get an abortion, I don't wanna put myself in some girl's whose pussy is slowly decomposing combined with extreme gangrene because of the shitty surgical condition that she got from some mexican cartel hospital, not to mention the dumpster that she's living in.
Even though if it's limited to rape victims or incest or some crazy batshit that a lunatic did, collecting evidence and filling forms and shit to prove that you got fucked by some maniac might just take forever, probably to the point that she fucking died or shit due to complications of giving birth or just a clothe hanger. I'm sure people who already got an abortion due to idiotic fucking wouldn't get a second one, I don't think anyone takes this as some kind of usual birth control.
You still have yet to post a thing that factually debunks my arguments.
Even if I didn't (I did, by citing a prominent individual) that wouldn't constitute that you've "proved" anything. What you could say instead (despite it being quite arguable) is that you believe you've formed a good argument and presented substantial evidence to back it up. That's not true and I disagree but it'd be a less inaccurate claim.You still have yet to post a thing that factually debunks my arguments.
We don't have to. It's much more fun to watch you post things that turn out to say the exact opposite of what your two-minute speed-read gives you the impression they say, then willfully deny it when the relevant lines are quoted straight back at you.
No, you keep taking every single thing I say out of context on purpose. When I bring up rape, it's because the person I was quoting mentioned it. Again, try to keep up, because you're just looking stupider and stupider.then willfully deny it when the relevant lines are quoted straight back at you.
How does that individual's work debunk the multiple studies that I've linked to? How have any of my links been debunked the the scientific community? Because they're cited all the time by reputable medical organizations, while the crackpot you linked to is only cited by Christians.I did, by citing a prominent individual
I have never killed any babies.you're a disingenuous baby killer.
Because they're cited all the time by reputable medical organizations, while the crackpot you linked to is only cited by Christians.
It doesn't necessarily need to. What I'm telling you isn't that anything is necessarily debunked, but that there is significant dispute on the matter, and by prominent individuals in the field. Thus, you cannot claim to have proven anything. At best, if you could prove that you have the majority of the medical community on your side then you can claim there's a scientific consensus on the matter, but you CANNOT claim to have "proven" a fucking thing.How does that individual's work debunk the multiple studies that I've linked to?
Prove he's a crackpot. If he was, then why was he allowed in on such important matters?The crackpot you linked to is only cited by Christians.
Sure, much like the Nazi officers who didn't personally gas the Jews never killed any Jews. You've got baby blood on your hands.I have never killed any babies.
And that pedophilia isn't a mental illness.Reputable medical organizations also say that cutting off your dick isn't a mental illness and say that puberty blockers have no side effects.