According to Wikipedia, the Boston Globe is a Pulitzer Prize winning newspaper, the 25th most read newspaper in America with a paid circulation of about a quarter of a million. Some time during the day on Monday, 27 August, the Boston Globe ran a short article giving some basic information about the three candidates running in the primary for the Eighth Congressional District: our man @RepStephenLynch, outsider maverick Christopher Voehl, and cockless ogre John Walker Flynt. (archive)
At around 10 PM on Tuesday, 28 August, John begins a tirade against this article on two fronts. First, he says that they chose an informal picture of him when in reality he ought to be on his knees in gratitude for not making him look like a snarling monstrosity as he usually does:
The following morning, at about 10:30 AM, he goes on another Ambien-fuelled tangent, bitching like a rabid dog about the fact that the online article apparently has no metadata and therefore cannot be found if one searches for "Brianna Wu". I didn't verify this claim but I don't give a fuck because it's irrelevant whether or not it was true or false.
A couple of his dumbass followers begin contacting the Boston Globe offices about this absolutely important issue - but let's backtrack a little. Previously, on Friday, 24 August, the Boston Globe published a piece on John only, and the general opinion was that in spite of hitting the prerequisite checkpoints of muh harassment and muh wamen in gaming, it made John look like the absolute incompetent dumbass that he is. In other words, it strongly implies that the Globe is aware that John is fucking useless joke candidate and was at least partly willing to say so.
But, on Wednesday, 29 August, and around 3 PM, John and his flying monkeys somehow succeed in getting the Globe to offer an apology for this literal rape and murder:
So, in summary: one of America's oldest and biggest newspapers kowtows to an idiotically trivial demand of John's in spite of the fact that it is quite likely that they know that his campaign is an absolute fraud. But remember, it's Dr*mpf and his Nazi followers who are journalism's existential threat, right?
At around 10 PM on Tuesday, 28 August, John begins a tirade against this article on two fronts. First, he says that they chose an informal picture of him when in reality he ought to be on his knees in gratitude for not making him look like a snarling monstrosity as he usually does:
The following morning, at about 10:30 AM, he goes on another Ambien-fuelled tangent, bitching like a rabid dog about the fact that the online article apparently has no metadata and therefore cannot be found if one searches for "Brianna Wu". I didn't verify this claim but I don't give a fuck because it's irrelevant whether or not it was true or false.
A couple of his dumbass followers begin contacting the Boston Globe offices about this absolutely important issue - but let's backtrack a little. Previously, on Friday, 24 August, the Boston Globe published a piece on John only, and the general opinion was that in spite of hitting the prerequisite checkpoints of muh harassment and muh wamen in gaming, it made John look like the absolute incompetent dumbass that he is. In other words, it strongly implies that the Globe is aware that John is fucking useless joke candidate and was at least partly willing to say so.
But, on Wednesday, 29 August, and around 3 PM, John and his flying monkeys somehow succeed in getting the Globe to offer an apology for this literal rape and murder:
So, in summary: one of America's oldest and biggest newspapers kowtows to an idiotically trivial demand of John's in spite of the fact that it is quite likely that they know that his campaign is an absolute fraud. But remember, it's Dr*mpf and his Nazi followers who are journalism's existential threat, right?