The only legal name I can see is Joss Prior who isn't the ginger gibbering spakka who authored the piss poor report above using her usual "we". Does speculative, unsubstantiated "intelligence" gain credibility if you add the word "we" to it? Or are plod supposed to overlook the speculation because a ginger spakka alleges others believe it to be true too?Providing the rozzers with intelligence isn’t “malicious ”, it’s concerned citizens reporting genuine issues to the authorities, which they must investigate. Especially with a super spreader like Tony. And I mean super spreader in the sense of him accommodating 626+ “reviewers” of his Troon escort profile.
If Tone does issue a sda to the Met, anything coming back will be redacted to take any identifying information about complainants out.
From a psychological perspective, @Jump Jet Fanny shouldn’t have posted the reports. Instead they should have just posted the suspected itinerary and let Tony’s furtive imagination take over.
If you're so confident @Jump Jet Fanny Louise, report in your name giving your legit details as point of contact and own your report. Or are you scared Big Steve will do you again?
ETA: The outcome of Louise's latest attention seeking? Giving Big Steve the chance to claim he's being stalked and the first erection he's had since Mark walked in with a bow tie and a mankini on ala Frank Butcher.