10 years from now society will evolve into a technocratic culture where people will be under a sistematized regime, exactly as the one used in the EU for DNA samples.I'm very intrigued by this fascinating information you have said. Could you kindly detail and educate us about this "free phones and free lines"?
I'm going to block you.Could it also tell us where our free phones are? Because I haven't got my free phone! Last time I checked I had to buy one, like everyone else!
At this point, I'm just sitting back and enjoying someone else buttblast Just Don't for a change. All he can do now is sperg out and espouse platitudes he clearly does not believe in.
European DNA banks have been around the 80's, mainly due to promote research and development around various congenital diseases. Lately, during the 00' those banks were started to be used for ancestry and heritage lines, meaning they acquired the DNA of millions for it.Elaborate on that one please?
Ok, so bottom line EU has compiled information about DNA from people. And I assume they're gonna link these to tracking via technology.European DNA banks have been around the 80's, mainly due to promote research and development around various congenital diseases. Lately, during the 00' those banks were started to be used for ancestry and heritage lines, meaning they acquired the DNA of millions for it.
Is not something a lot of people know about, even europeans aren't aware that their DNA (at least the data) is located in some form of systematized database. Like in the states with criminals, except that in the EU they compile information about anyone because of the ease of access thru borders.
Scandinavia, Germany and France are the leading countries in human DNA recollection. The WHO also approved DNA manipulation and suggested guidelines for pharma companies and laboratories to do studies about. Mainly ethical guidelines.
You can google all that, you could have even google about DNA banks in Europe. Is not secret information.
Ok, so bottom line EU has compiled information about DNA from people. And I assume they're gonna link these to tracking via technology.
I answer this above, but is not about just giving devices and lines, is about empowering people with technology to breach the gap of inequity.Now question is, how would this be linked to free phones or lines (which hasn't even happened yet, maybe tomorrow or even never)? I know given your posts the purpose is to track them further, but why the effort just to give free phones when there should be an easier better solution which is via surveillance?
Is about order and equity. Not about control or benefits.Also, how would the government benefit from tracking you to begin with? I don't think government has nothing else better to do than to watch you watching typical boring TV episodes.
April 13, 2021
The Roadmap for the 'Great Reset'By Janet Levy
As far back as 1996, Mikhail Gorbachev laid bare the agenda driving climate alarmism: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.” He was underscoring the importance of advancing Marxist objectives by creating an emergency to convince people they must surrender freedom to be safe. That idea has been parlayed over the decades into a global campaign of the Left to control vibrant economies, end individual freedom and national sovereignties, and impoverish the world. In America, it is being served up as the Green New Deal (GND).
Author Marc Morano exposes that elaborate con game in Green Fraud: Why the Green New Deal Is Even Worse Than You Think. Morano is a former senior staff member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and narrator of the film Climate Hustle. His book shows how the GND -- which dovetails with the U.N.’s Agenda 21 -- has nothing to do with “saving the planet” and is actually about “transforming modern America into a centrally planned and managed society and imposing an ideology that will rein in the freedoms of individual Americans.”
Like Gorbachev, GND champions admit as much. Morano quotes Saikat Chakrabarti, former chief of staff to debutant Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as saying, “We really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” And he cites Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign aide Waleed Shahid explaining the GND as “a proposal to redistribute wealth and power from people on top to the people at the bottom.”
For an agenda so ambitious, the name ironically draws on FDR’s failed New Deal of the 1930s, a massive program that expanded the size and scope of the federal government to stimulate an economic recovery but ended up prolonging the Great Depression. The prognosis for the GND -- which includes components like universal healthcare, guaranteed annual income, affordable housing, clear water and air projects, and special social and racial justice goals -- is worse. Says David Ridenour, president of the National Center for Public Policy Research, “To reach zero net-carbon emissions in 10 years, the government would regulate and ultimately prohibit the use of affordable energy sources. This would trigger a massive decline in industrial productivity and result in mass layoffs.”
Morano attacks the misconception that CO2 levels are rising, explaining how they are in fact among the lowest now in Earth’s history, and debunks the idea that it is the “control knob” of the climate. He notes how land use, volcanoes, wind oscillations, ocean cycles, solar activity, the Earth’s tilt, and multifarious other factors impact climate, adding up to much more than the impact of CO2. He explains that the gas is a harmless and essential component of the atmosphere, a natural product of respiration. Climate scientist Anastasios Tsonis, a former distinguished professor emeritus of University of Wisconsin, is in agreement: “I’m a skeptic not just about global warming but also about many other aspects of science… Climate is too complicated to attribute its variability to one cause.”
In truth, the GND is an all-encompassing attack on capitalism, wealth creation, and freedom; it’s a vehicle for a “fundamental transformation” of our constitutional republic. The list of non-climate issues tagged on to so-called green goals is ludicrous: income inequality, racial wealth divide, gender earnings gap, ad infinitum, ad nauseum. Ocasio-Cortez even believes 100% renewable energy will lead to “economic, social, and racial justice” in America. Meat-eating isn’t spared: the GND proposes to end meat-eating, in line with U.N. climate advisors’ suggestion that meat-eaters be ostracized like smokers and meat prices wildly inflated to discourage consumption. Why? Flatulent cows and sheep flood the atmosphere with climate-changing methane. To get to “net zero” emissions by 2050, GND proponents want to eliminate private vehicles, home ownership, and air travel; they also want to ban new roads, fossil fuel production, and nuclear power. These will be achieved through draconian taxes and regulations that advance the Left’s depopulation and deindustrialization agenda.
So, a caste system where people are numbered and enslaved accordingly. I'm sure some groups will be more restricted based on the categories defined by wealthy STEMlords... how is this "progressive"?10 years from now society will evolve into a technocratic culture where people will be under a sistematized regime, exactly as the one used in the EU for DNA samples.
To create order in a world with no borders the first step is giving the population access to devices that can track their geolocation, their statistics, their social medias, platforms and the like, plus giving access to an unique "code" for that person that can also serve as their unique tag to access services like transportation, health care, goods or any form of service.
The move will start by being voluntary and slowly be moved as obligatory.
People, ignorant and unrealistic, talk about being chipped... When reality is that everyone is already chipped via internet or their own smartphones.
I'm going to block you.
You are incredibly retarded and don't contribute anything to this thread.
I feel real bad for your mom. You are an example on why abortion should be legal.