What do you think Aktion Reinhard was exactly?. I don't think that this was a conscious policy, or even one that was issued through innuendo like Aktion Reinhard was, but rather simply an outpouring of various peoples' desire to deal with them while they had the chance.
It didn't take 80 years. The tapes were known about in 1960, though no one cared too much. Eichmann had already confessed so the Holocaust was never in question.
I posted about these earlier in this thread ('the sassen tapes') . @Clorox Cowboy here is context for the first quote
View attachment 3461888
View attachment 3461890
View attachment 3461893
The original tapes had been sold to a publishing house in Europe, and eventually bought by an anonymous firm which handed them over to the German federal archives in Koblenz, with instructions that they should be used only for academic research.
Kobi Sitt, a grandson of Holocaust survivors and the producer of the new documentary, made a movie for Israeli television about Hausner 20 years ago, and has wanted to access the Eichmann tapes ever since.
Finally the German archives agreed, believing, he said, that they would be treated respectfully. 'I'm not afraid of the memory, I'm afraid of the forgetfulness,' said Sitt. He said he wanted 'to provide a tool to breathe life into the memory' as the generation of survivors dies out.
I think I read somewhere they were digitized but the problem may stem from there being personal info on these tapes, since essentially they were recordings of social gatherings. If rights are still owned by Sassen, maybe they don't want all this info about old family and friends coming out. Sassen and his friends were Nazi sympthaziers and anti-semites, not a good look these days. If the tape is massively edited, deniers might still be suspicious, so what can you do?According the the article I linked.
Do you have any speculation as to why these tapes were not made available to the general public, digitized or other methods of making them widely available for academics outside whatever archive housed them? I agree with @Lemmingwise that it seems weird they've seemingly just been sitting around collecting dust, especially if it is "Proof against Holocaust deniers and a way to see the true face of Eichmann."
I have not been given a reason to doubt the authenticity of these tapes, but I feel if there is audio of someone high-ranking official admitting to his crimes at least an abridged version should be available. I doubt we (the general public) will even get access to the full 15 hours and it will just be whatever the documentary makers decide to use. Super frustrating.
I have been thinking about this. In any case it is convenient that these old tapes only part is made public and only in a time period where we have completely convincing AI voice replacement; although it doesn't seem to be the case, because if it had been a complete fabrication I'm sure they would have gone for a more damning text than " if we had" which isn't even a confession.Do you have any speculation as to why these tapes were not made available to the general public, digitized or other methods of making them widely available for academics outside whatever archive housed them?
A 25% difference is smaller than the difference between official claimed jewish deaths and actual jewish deaths during WW2.It didn't take 80 years. The tapes were known about in 1960,
Some might question why the millions of victims of the great purge and holodomor haven't been dug up. How can we know it happened without the bodies?
I would say it's definetly in a leaders interest to destroy the enemy within the borders just as much as the enemy outside. Especially if the group in question already wanted to see the leaders country destroyed years before the war.Riddle me this: If Hitler was fighting three wars, why would he have expended resources to find and detain Jews? It seems contra productive to the war efforts.
The Holocaust never happened.
True. But the real threat was the Allies, not a bunch of Jews.I would say it's definetly in a leaders interest to destroy the enemy within the borders just as much as the enemy outside. Especially if the group in question already wanted to see the leaders country destroyed years before the war.
Don't believe Hitler killed more than 1 million maximum tho as this would've completly overstreched it.
They're not releasing the tapes, but playing excerpts. This has done before eg here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4NGKCPz-n4 . The tapes were also covered during the trial in the 60s. Eichmann's defense fought to get them excluded and Eichmann said they were inadmissible as evidence because they were drunken ramblings or some such if I remember correctly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kom8iVUG48w&ab_channel=EichmannTrialENOf course another advantage of releasing it late is that people with memories regarding him would be dead.
Well Holodomor has been invoked by Ukranian nationalists since before WW2 and is thus a probable factor in the pretty significant war that is happening right now. US and the West had reason to play up Soviet atrocities during the cold war. Putting my conspiracy hat on, I can see how these things at least to some extent could have been fabricated by questionable actors, which I believe is the official position of the current Russian goverment.It's not close to being in the same realm of political relevancy. When is the last time legislation got blocked or even reversed when invoking the specter of the holodomor?
Yeah, he says they didn't kill 10.3 million, or even half that. Sassen circle was using Reitlinger's numbers (up until that point, the only academic treatment of the Holocaust). Reitlinger put the death toll at 4.5 million.And now seeing broader context his next sentence is that it did not happen. What a surprise.
My point is that in actual political relevancy of discussing one or the other is comparing a mountain to a molehill. I've given some examples as to why, and you don't seem to be disagreeing with those, so I presume you agree.Well Holodomor has been invoked by Ukranian nationalists since before WW2 and is thus a probable factor in the pretty significant war that is happening right now. US and the West had reason to play up Soviet atrocities during the cold war. Putting my conspiracy hat on, I can see how these things at least to some extent could have been fabricated by questionable actors, which I believe is the official position of the current Russian goverment.
Nevertheless your position is the Holocaust is comparable to these other events in terms of evidence, yet should be viewed with much more skepticism due to the fact that various parties have profited from it or exploited it for political gain?
the Holocaust as a singular event is surely more prominent in consciousness, though to be fair for American conservatives the crimes of the USSR are really big in defining their anti-socialist position. And people here are really really uneducated about the Holocaust. So I don't think it's big deal for most.But you know it's not the same ballpark and you know you're just trying to misdirect things for your own advantage, again.
Lmao, 6 million jews killed. Something you disagreed with earlier. People who say that 6 million didn't die are used as an example of being "uneducated" about the holocaust. I think you've agreed earlier, though perhaps it was another affirmer, that the number isn't 6 million and that even the sanctioned historians agree.Through the survey, the Claims Conference calculated Holocaust "knowledge scores" using the percentage of millennials and Gen Z adults who met all three criteria: they have definitively heard about the Holocaust, the can name at least one concentration camp, death camp, or ghetto, and they know that 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust.
I see you lurked for over a year just to shill your YouTube channel and repeat mainstream talking points.Documentary evidence is the foundation of history. Contrary to the memes, it is the Holocaust deniers, not the mainstream, who exhibit an evidentiary double standard in this context, by dismissing evidence they accept as proof of other historical events. Deniers do not demand exact physical evidence to prove the Holodomor, or the Battle of the Somme.
That said, there is massive physical evidence for the Holocaust.
There is overwhelming chemical evidence that the gas chambers were exposed to hydrogen cyanide. For example, despite the fact that four of the five Auschwitz-Birkenau crema buildings (gas chambers) are in ruins, they still contain much more cyanide than the other buildings in Birkenau, excluding the (intact) delousing chambers. Why would the residue (mortar, etc) of these buildings, dynamited by the Germans and exposed to the elements for 80 years, still contain so much more cyanide than random buildings in Auschwitz?
By the way, there was a gas chamber in Majdanek that was not demolished by the Nazis, before liberation and contained the Prussian Blue staining you are obsessed with. See attached pic.
While repeating "muh mass graves" like trained parakeets, you ignore the numerous mass graves that have been found. For example the dozens of mass graves found in Belzec, which even denier Carlo Mattogno admits could accomodate 170,000 corpses. (This is a vast underestimate, due to Mattogno's failure to acknowledge how starved the Jews were, but still revealing.)
Lol, how are you not being carted away by ex Stasi right now? If you are, feel free to flee here to a country that still technically values freedom of speech.those 2 were not the same..... one were starving their own people for shits and giggles while the other one was fighting globohomo...