What do you look for, when determining whether or not a news website, channel, etc. is credible? And, do you think it is misleading when political talk/debate shows, have people on who represent un reputable news sites?
I say that for news, I go first to the factual, unbiased news, (current event is reported, no opinion just the facts, same facts have been reported elsewhere) then I dunno this is probably bad of me, but every now and then I look at the tabloid news, but I take those articles with a grain of salt. I asked the second question because I wonder if when say Dr. Drew has on people representing different websites and networks, doesn't something like that send the message, to the average viewer, "Yeah these guys are all on equal footing!"?
I say that for news, I go first to the factual, unbiased news, (current event is reported, no opinion just the facts, same facts have been reported elsewhere) then I dunno this is probably bad of me, but every now and then I look at the tabloid news, but I take those articles with a grain of salt. I asked the second question because I wonder if when say Dr. Drew has on people representing different websites and networks, doesn't something like that send the message, to the average viewer, "Yeah these guys are all on equal footing!"?
