Hi everyone! As the title of this thread suggests, I’m setting up this space to discuss the NEET culture and ‘movement’ in relation to modern society. This is a special thread because it was a commission, as in, someone asked me to make the thread in order to fire up the discussion!
I don’t know if this is common, here in the Farms, but why would someone ask something like this to a 45 years old Argentinian, retired GEOF lieutenant who worked his ass off ever since he was 17 and likes to laugh at retards? It really is beyond me... Yet, I think it is a good mental exercise and a nice way to get in touch with today’s young sub-cultures.
So, what the fuck is a NEET?
And according to our good friend @kindercola:
I'm getting a bad vibe from this group right from the start. They advocate the illegal use of digital media, they are proudly unemployed and not actively looking for a job. Basically, criminals without an activity and leeching out the system and, by extension, the taxpayer.
Are NEETs really a social renaissance?
I can see why someone would compare them to the movement started by the European artists of the 14th to the 17th century: Both were unemployed under society's standards and both had invented their own philosophies on how to view humanity as a whole. I think those comparisons are merely superficial. The new ideals the visionaries of old were following, centered the individual above the divine, especially the Greek philosopher Protagoras, who said that "Man is the measure of all things." as separating God from Man and accepting humanity itself as the big creator. This way of thinking spread well beyond the arts and into politics, science and religion.
On the other hand, we have a bunch of kids (or barely functioning adults) trying to live off the fat of the land, their parents and/or the state with deteriorating minds due to isolation and focusing entirely on entertainment. They believe that doing nothing productive all day is a new way of enlightenment, barely sharing any ideas or socializing outside of shitposting in imageboards.
So I'll say: No, they are not a social renaissance.
I don't agree. The Hippies were a derivative counterculture (not merely a social trend) from the Beatniks, an ultra-sarcastic and bleak group who rivaled the "straight" or "squares" of the 50's; strongly protesting against the idea of the nuclear family and the raging paranoia of the Cold War America. Being a Hippie meant to be a non-conformist but completely opposing the Beatniks by projecting joy, trying to free oneself from societal restrictions, to choose your own way and find new meaning in life. They were associated with altruism and mysticism, honesty, joy, and non violence. They were especially relevant in the 60's and 70's due to their fierce opposition to war (Vietnam), the eagerness for recreational use of drugs and for advocating free love. Their influence, beyond their ideas or politics, spread to music, fashion and family organization.
NEETism seems to be centered entirely on validating oneself without creating any culture whatsoever. From the information I could gather, they seem to value one's happiness above all by mathematic formulas showing the "efficiency" of their own life: "Assuming the goal of humans is pleasure and happiness, the life of a NEET is worth a little over 1.5 that of a Normal’s life." They do seem to understand that their lifestyle isn't for everyone, though; and call outsiders "Normies", just like the Hippies and Beatniks call the norm "Squares" but there's a key difference:
"The numbers show that the actual amount of hours spent in free time (anything that isn’t sleeping, working, healthcare, or related to them) between a NEET and a Normal are substantially different, leaning heavily toward Normalcy being the better option".
They seem to know that the life of a NEET is not self-sufficient or sustainable in the long run. Not only because of the lack of earnings to afford their lifestyle but also because of the contradiction born in opposing the social structure and staying in it at the same time. The Hippies were more of a rural bunch with those truly into their philosophy, living and creating communes outside of a system they opposed. NEETs don't have their own space, their own grounds, because their grounds are the same as the "normal" people, going against the social contract but still subscribing to it. They might be perceived by society as parasites, just like the Hippies, but their goals and ideals are very different.
This statement is weird. If we take it at face value, there's something severely wrong with the people following NEETism: Why is the average lifespan of a NEET 30 years old? Why do they die sooner if they are happier and more relaxed?
Oh. So it's a giant asspull.
In conclusion, NEETism seems to be a way of life chosen by a lot of the site's cows. Some of them because they find more pleasure in doing nothing as long as they can, some others because they pretend to be disabled in order to pursue pleasure in doing nothing as long as they can and the rest, because they are truly disabled (mentally and whatnot) and want to pleasure themselves doing nothing as long as they can. Doesn't seem to be based on any real projection of the world, doesn't seem to be rooted in the realities of modern society and it isn't sustainable in the long run. No wonder this is the chosen lifestyle of so many cows frolicking the farms. If someone approaches me and states "I'm a proud NEET", I ought to assume this person is really sad, like really depressed or mentally ill.
But that's me. What do you think?
kindercola said:Thank you for volunteering to check over my idea for a new thread. I don't really know which board this is appropriate for, maybe General? I want people to consider this in a more serious manner, so I doubt Deep Thoughts is a good fit.
I was thinking of creating a thread to spark discussion as to whether NEETs are a social movement, in the same vein as bohemians and hippies, or not.
I was going to cite research and census data showing about NEETs to explain certain phenomenon about them. Here are some exerpts I have already written up. Your input is much appreciated.
I don’t know if this is common, here in the Farms, but why would someone ask something like this to a 45 years old Argentinian, retired GEOF lieutenant who worked his ass off ever since he was 17 and likes to laugh at retards? It really is beyond me... Yet, I think it is a good mental exercise and a nice way to get in touch with today’s young sub-cultures.
So, what the fuck is a NEET?
Wikipedia said:A NEET or neet is a young person who is "Not in Education, Employment, or Training".
In the United Kingdom, the classification comprises people aged between 16 and 24 (some 16 and 17 year-olds are still of compulsory school age); the subgroup of NEETs aged 16–18 is frequently of particular focus. In Japan, the classification comprises people aged between 15 and 34 who are not employed, not engaged in housework, not enrolled in school or work-related training, and not seeking work.
The acronym NEET was first used in the United Kingdom but its use has spread to other countries and regions including Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and the United States.
And according to our good friend @kindercola:
kindercola said:"They were originally called Freeters (short for freeloader) or parasite single in their original form in the mid-90s in Japan."
"NEETs as they are today started in the late 90s/early 2000s in Japan with the rise of the internet and Asian market crash and then spread elsewhere, starting with North America. The main characteristics are usually a usage and discussion of/activism for: piracy of media, universal basic income, social security/welfare, and calling for elimination of job training centres or proof of applying to jobs in order to receive welfare. They usually also advocate for distance education, especially when it is cheap or free, as well learning to code. Many are between 18-30 and mentally ill (typically with depression, anxiety or autism) and/or transgender.
I'm getting a bad vibe from this group right from the start. They advocate the illegal use of digital media, they are proudly unemployed and not actively looking for a job. Basically, criminals without an activity and leeching out the system and, by extension, the taxpayer.
Are NEETs really a social renaissance?
kindercola said:Ironically, while many NEETs claim to be learning at home and improving their mental state, research shows that isolation and not having a routine imposed by others, such as work/school deteriorates IQ irreparably. Additionally, many of these individuals' claims to be busying themselves with intellectual pursuits can be easily discredited by their time spent on imageboards and videogame clients like Steam all day. When they do participate in free learning groups, they rarely go beyond the beginner phases.
I can see why someone would compare them to the movement started by the European artists of the 14th to the 17th century: Both were unemployed under society's standards and both had invented their own philosophies on how to view humanity as a whole. I think those comparisons are merely superficial. The new ideals the visionaries of old were following, centered the individual above the divine, especially the Greek philosopher Protagoras, who said that "Man is the measure of all things." as separating God from Man and accepting humanity itself as the big creator. This way of thinking spread well beyond the arts and into politics, science and religion.
On the other hand, we have a bunch of kids (or barely functioning adults) trying to live off the fat of the land, their parents and/or the state with deteriorating minds due to isolation and focusing entirely on entertainment. They believe that doing nothing productive all day is a new way of enlightenment, barely sharing any ideas or socializing outside of shitposting in imageboards.
So I'll say: No, they are not a social renaissance.
kindercola said:Why is NEETism a social trend as opposed to a class of person?
I believe NEETs are a social trend just as hippies are because of their sudden rise and how intimately they are tied to imageboards. Additionally, the lifestyle has become more popular, especially among transgender women as more video games depict it and it spreads to more corners of the internet. This parallels other social movements, where it only the most lonely/desperate/hardcore would be members, and then a sharp increase in membership is seen as it becomes more mainstream.
I don't agree. The Hippies were a derivative counterculture (not merely a social trend) from the Beatniks, an ultra-sarcastic and bleak group who rivaled the "straight" or "squares" of the 50's; strongly protesting against the idea of the nuclear family and the raging paranoia of the Cold War America. Being a Hippie meant to be a non-conformist but completely opposing the Beatniks by projecting joy, trying to free oneself from societal restrictions, to choose your own way and find new meaning in life. They were associated with altruism and mysticism, honesty, joy, and non violence. They were especially relevant in the 60's and 70's due to their fierce opposition to war (Vietnam), the eagerness for recreational use of drugs and for advocating free love. Their influence, beyond their ideas or politics, spread to music, fashion and family organization.
NEETism seems to be centered entirely on validating oneself without creating any culture whatsoever. From the information I could gather, they seem to value one's happiness above all by mathematic formulas showing the "efficiency" of their own life: "Assuming the goal of humans is pleasure and happiness, the life of a NEET is worth a little over 1.5 that of a Normal’s life." They do seem to understand that their lifestyle isn't for everyone, though; and call outsiders "Normies", just like the Hippies and Beatniks call the norm "Squares" but there's a key difference:
"The numbers show that the actual amount of hours spent in free time (anything that isn’t sleeping, working, healthcare, or related to them) between a NEET and a Normal are substantially different, leaning heavily toward Normalcy being the better option".
They seem to know that the life of a NEET is not self-sufficient or sustainable in the long run. Not only because of the lack of earnings to afford their lifestyle but also because of the contradiction born in opposing the social structure and staying in it at the same time. The Hippies were more of a rural bunch with those truly into their philosophy, living and creating communes outside of a system they opposed. NEETs don't have their own space, their own grounds, because their grounds are the same as the "normal" people, going against the social contract but still subscribing to it. They might be perceived by society as parasites, just like the Hippies, but their goals and ideals are very different.
From the same text linked above said:However, the Normal also lives for 60 years as opposed to a NEETs 30, which reveals the real information needed for a conclusion. A Normal will spend just over 40% of their life in a period of free time from age 20 to 80 (assumed age of death), whereas a NEET will spend two thirds of their life in a period of free time from age 20 to 50 (assumed age of death). The conclusion is that NEETs live a more pleasurable life, assuming pleasure is a stable way of measuring life’s value.
This statement is weird. If we take it at face value, there's something severely wrong with the people following NEETism: Why is the average lifespan of a NEET 30 years old? Why do they die sooner if they are happier and more relaxed?
*** All numbers are based on U.S. national averages for the age groups included in these calculations. I may show the math work here some time, but honestly it doesn’t need to be here so it isn’t high priority on my to-do list. ***
Oh. So it's a giant asspull.
In conclusion, NEETism seems to be a way of life chosen by a lot of the site's cows. Some of them because they find more pleasure in doing nothing as long as they can, some others because they pretend to be disabled in order to pursue pleasure in doing nothing as long as they can and the rest, because they are truly disabled (mentally and whatnot) and want to pleasure themselves doing nothing as long as they can. Doesn't seem to be based on any real projection of the world, doesn't seem to be rooted in the realities of modern society and it isn't sustainable in the long run. No wonder this is the chosen lifestyle of so many cows frolicking the farms. If someone approaches me and states "I'm a proud NEET", I ought to assume this person is really sad, like really depressed or mentally ill.
But that's me. What do you think?
Last edited: