Who would have thought politicians only support stuff when it benefits them and stop supporting it when it doesn’t. Also this argument is the same tier as going “Democrats used to be kkk Democrats are real racist liberals owned”.
That leads to a new problem where the number of accidents involving guns will increase drastically because the current population are extremely stupidEveryone should have guns so nobody is able to use guns. I don’t understand what’s so confusing about that.
If you shoot someone who’s about to have a gun accident then the only gun violence in the situation is both on purpose and preventative.That leads to a new problem where the number of accidents involving guns will increase drastically because the current population are extremely stupid
One of the arguments used in the Dred Scott decision is that if black people were to become full citizens they would gain the right to own guns, with the implication that the US constitution gives the right to keep and bare arms to all citizens....unless it's scary brown people, in which you can't own guns.
http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/beararms/sct.htmChief Justice Roger Taney said:[Citizenship] would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right … to keep and carry arms wherever they went.