(Rate me autistic on this one if you want, but here goes.)
Back about 6 years ago I remember reading a forum discussion in which the high rate of black criminality, particularly violent crime and murder, was explained away by pointing to the high poverty rate in the black community. In other words Blacks commit violent crimes not because they are black, but because they are poor.
So I looked at the most recent census stats (2010 at the time) for the population size, poverty rate, and white, black, and hispanic populations. Then combined it with the 2010 FBI crime stats, made some spread sheets, wrote some Matlab code and made some graphs. (Just making this point, because you won't be able to reverse image source these pictures.)
So in the first picture we have the Poverty rate in the first column, Black pop. percentage in the second column, and White population perc. in the third column, The top row is the Violent Crime rate and the second row is the Murder rate. The cut off for cities was population >250,000 (can't remember why I picked that), and the graphs show the correlation between the data.
View attachment 1356706
The results in the first row show that Poverty/Violent Crime and Black/Violent Crime correlate positively about the same. So not good for the "Blacks are violent because they are impoverished" argument, as the Black poverty rate tends to be about 20%. There's also a bit of a negative correlation between Whites and Violent Crime.
The results in the second row are damning. Poverty/Murder correlate positively at ~.43, but Black/Murder correlate pos. at ~.61. I'd be surprised if anyone can find a statistic that correlates better with a city's Murder rate than the Black population. Really, if you want to avoid murder, avoid Black cities. Period.
A bit related to this has been the discussion (and fear) about which trend America's growing Hispanic population will follow. Will they be like Blacks? or Whites? So in the second picture we have two of the same data sets from the previous (Poverty and White) and Black has now been replaced with Hispanic. Fortunately Hispanic follows the White trend with slight negative correlations for Violent Crime and Murder. Not as good as the White numbers, but considering the high rate of Hispanic poverty at 18% (nearly as high as Black poverty), that's pretty damn good. So hurray for Pablo (and America too).
View attachment 1356707
You want to see some statistics that'll really make you think? Check out the crime rates for the poorest white homogeneous area in the US (some county in Appalachia) versus the crime rates for the wealthiest black homogeneous area in the US (some community in California). The rich black people still cause far more crimes of all types than the poor whites. That, to me, is proof right there that it isn't poverty or class inequality causing blacks to commit crimes.
Every single ethnic group (or pretty much most of them) have at some point had members of their group enslaved by others, yet Black people act as if they were the only ones. The amount of white people enslaved by non Europeans in all likelihood is probably equal to the amount of Africans enslaved, but because no ones actually done the calculations, people pretend like it was lower in scale.
Exactly. Blacks weren't even the only slaves in America. There were white slaves as well, mostly Irish. But you don't hear about them or the black slave traders in school or most history books. It goes against the narrative. There is absolutely an agenda behind all this, and it's disgusting.
Edit:
View attachment 1401093
Warning from a Venezuelan:
View attachment 1401039
Some info about what might be going on:
View attachment 1401045
CHAZ openly siding with China:
View attachment 1401059
Evidence that ex CNN employees get hired to spread Chinese propaganda, hinting that CNN might have ties to China:
http://archive.md/Y4yyP
Nice to know CHAZ is OK with literal slavery and human organ harvesting. Fucking Commies are all the same.
Last edited: