captkrisma
kiwifarms.net
What's surprising is they got upset when Trump personally said he didn't care and would reject it if he won.
Time's Person of the Year The Silence Breakers #MeToo Salt - Whiney MRA's complaining about rapists being outed
- Thread starter Steve Mayers
- Start date
- Status
What's surprising is they got upset when Trump personally said he didn't care and would reject it if he won.
What's more exceptional, giving TIME Magazine any acknowledgement or taking it this seriously?
Rhetorical = Both.
Rhetorical = Both.
Shroom King
kiwifarms.net
L
LM 697
Guest
kiwifarms.net
yeah like this guy and all the other angsty boys actually read time
You know, this year has been a year of people emboldened. Seeing the old power structures crumbling down, they're stepping up, some of them for the first time ever, to tell their stories and bring more and more of what's wrong with the world to light.
For all that they could have come forward earlier, it would have been pointless.
The original MeToo'ers, sure, but holy shit am I tired of how it just became a cash-in for fame.
Throw in a $150 reward and all women would have some story to spin into 'sexual abuse'. Björk had it out for Lars von Trier during the filming of a movie. She claimed he clapped her ass and all the usual shit, while both he and another director said she arrived 24 hours late, demanded her own apartment as opposed to the usual housing, had a gang of 24 employed people (probably just Instagram friends) carry her around on her ass. She's physically taller, stronger, and considering von Trier cries constantly, mentally stronger.
They should've named the original few women by name instead of just blanket-applauding this ordeal.
The few male celebrities I've seen talk about it outside America just does the usual 'it happens to everyone, it's a bigger issue than Hollywood, deal with it' approach but gets no attention. Stories of literal crotch groping in public because 'he's bald and old, he must love it
'. Woosh, over the head of media.
Throw in a $150 reward and all women would have some story to spin into 'sexual abuse'. Björk had it out for Lars von Trier during the filming of a movie. She claimed he clapped her ass and all the usual shit, while both he and another director said she arrived 24 hours late, demanded her own apartment as opposed to the usual housing, had a gang of 24 employed people (probably just Instagram friends) carry her around on her ass. She's physically taller, stronger, and considering von Trier cries constantly, mentally stronger.
They should've named the original few women by name instead of just blanket-applauding this ordeal.
The few male celebrities I've seen talk about it outside America just does the usual 'it happens to everyone, it's a bigger issue than Hollywood, deal with it' approach but gets no attention. Stories of literal crotch groping in public because 'he's bald and old, he must love it
'. Woosh, over the head of media.
:powerlevel: well akchally if you are a true supporter of equality you are both a MRA and a feminist :powerlevel:
Hilarious to think that Taylor Swift is on there. All those songs about ex's I feel are just "pity party for Swift" and I'd like to hear what the other side was like. What if it turns out she's an abusive bitch who threatened to gash her boyfriend's tires?
In all honesty I agree that as a "blanket movement" it does seem like a slightly bad idea due to #metoo turning into a shitshow, but the people who started the movement encouraging more people to speak up? Sounds great, as someone else stated. There are some actually shitty people out there who admitted to doing shitty things when this hit big.
But people taking the recognition of sexual harassment as an attack on one gender alone (like Paul Joseph Watson) is retarded. I've seen everyone, men, women, and even "other genders" come out about sexual harassment because of #metoo. They seem to ignore that assault isn't a gendered problem to suit their own agenda (despite preaching the whole "male victims matter too" mantra), and acting like it's just women accusing men, when it's not. Sure, women started the #metoo movement but it wasn't just women following suit.
Don't see any men on the Time cover.
Don't see any women getting ousted from their jobs.
Seems pretty gendered to me. (ALSO PJW IS A RETARD I HAVE TO WRITE THAT OR PEOPLE WILL THINK I'M AN MRA.)
Melanie Martinez is pretty fucked at the moment, have you seen the allegation against her because she allegedly raped one of her friends? Everyone on my insta and facebook is all over it. A lot of people don't want to support her or her music anymore.
Considering time magazine has been going since the 1920s (I think) I doubt it's a gendered thing, since women weren't allowed to vote until around that time. My guess is around then women weren't taken 100% seriously, especially a big change such as that at the time.
Not wanting to be that guy, but just because you haven't seen any men on the cover in your lifetime doesn't mean there never were any. I think Martin Luther King Jr was Time's person of the year in the 60's.
Wasn't Mark Zuckerberg person of the year in 2010? I think he was but I can't remember completely. It was within my lifetime but I was only a young'un then.
Those are only a couple of examples I can think of off the top of my head from things I've either seen or was told about in school/by others at the moment. There's probably more from the 2000s i'm missing
Last edited:
Pussy grabber himself was Time POTY last year.
Was it not obvious that I was referring run to men on the cover of the l silence breaker issue? I'm not saying that Time magazine as a whole is somehow "gendered", I'm saying that the issue of sexual harassment is from all pragmatic standards. The fact that women can sexually harass men is completely ignored in the mainstream.
Last edited:
The big question is, what will be the long-term impact? Power doesn't go down without a fight. Will the accused suffer more than just a few month's of infamy before they're forgotten in favor of the next Twitterstorm? Will the accusers feel any kind of retaliation?
Because it was women who started the #metoo thing I believe. That encouraged a) people to speak out and b) the shitshow (unfortunately).
I wouldn't say it's completely ignored either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI-jNe8SPmk
Useful time marker: 2:59 for when the content actually happens.
Useful time marker: 2:59 for when the content actually happens.
I don't think there were any men involved in the creation of the movement, I think the women on the cover were directly involved (or very big names in the movement), however I might be wrong seeing as I didn't pay all that much attention to who started the movement as the movement went downhill very quickly. I may also be wrong about it being those directly involved.
There may have been less men tweeting about it- I don't know for sure if that is the case, but seeing as it does seem to be very full of women commenting on it and sharing their experiences possibly more than men, it may be so. Considering how over saturated the movement got because of what some people define as "harassment" under certain narratives and beliefs. I think because of how many women posted about it (and like I said what some people define as harassment) the potentially smaller amount of men's posts got drowned out.
((EDIT: Having said that on the website Terry Crews was mentioned as a part of #metoo))
It's not right, i know that. Trust me I know that it's shitty to have someone tell you that what happened wasn't a big deal because of a certain reason.
It would have been nice to see not just women on the cover, but I think the "person of the year" is defined as the people who "broke" the silence. Which is why I think it was the people who started the movement as opposed to people involved.
Last edited:
Who the fuck reads “Time” magazine?
People waiting at the doctor's office?
(I did like reading the old back issues when I was in college though, like from the 1930s and that)
And "Person of the Year" isn't even an achievement, or an award. It's just to name the person or persons who made the most impact on a particular year. Fucking HITLER was once Person of the Year, so was Ayatollah Khomeini. (Everyone thought that it would be Bin Laden in 2001, but Time chickened out)
It's more like, "Newsmaker of the Year".
(I did like reading the old back issues when I was in college though, like from the 1930s and that)
And "Person of the Year" isn't even an achievement, or an award. It's just to name the person or persons who made the most impact on a particular year. Fucking HITLER was once Person of the Year, so was Ayatollah Khomeini. (Everyone thought that it would be Bin Laden in 2001, but Time chickened out)
It's more like, "Newsmaker of the Year".
Munchingonfish
kiwifarms.net
Holy shit Ruffalo is insufferable.
BLM somehow got into a video about sexual assault ...
Attachments
Last edited:
Let's look at his channel...
Chris Cornell and Chester Bennington are Illuminati sacrifices.
Dwayne Johnson's tattoos give him demonic powers.
BET awards are an occult ritual.
Charlie Murphy assassinated by the Illuminati.
Coca Cola is a gay conspiracy.
Madonna is a man.
I think I've found a new pet truther.
Anyway, these guys are really sad. As soon as some women come forward with complaints about being forced to have the sex these guys have never had they roll out the salt barrels.
What does this guy mean "what about the men?". Bryan Singer is going down in flames right now.
Does this guy think anyone besides him is not affiliated with the Illuminati? Is everyone a demon? This guy is priceless. And he sounds like a bad 70s DJ. He missed his calling.
- Status
Similar threads
The Liberal revolutions are over. And they have failed.