Archeopthryx
kiwifarms.net
This is an extreme reaction to Muslims culturally appropriating Japanese cuisine.
Tobias Rathjen shooting in Hanau, Germany shisha bars on February 20th, 2020 -
Same where I live. "Experts" are on TV sperging about this "right wing" guy and how the "evil internet" are surprisingly not supporting this guy as they always do
. The wicked internet people are even making jokes about him! (some idiot said this). This is why mainstream media can just die already.
It's sick how the media is hell bent on giving this psycho a political affiliation. This dude was so paranoid, he couldn't be part of any political group.
Thanks for archiving his pdf's, Null. One look into it is enough to see the clown for what he is and what circus the media is making out of his deeds.
Thanks for archiving his pdf's, Null. One look into it is enough to see the clown for what he is and what circus the media is making out of his deeds.
Cheerlead-in-Chief
kiwifarms.net
My own German grammar is shit despite correct pronounciations...what the fucking Hell?! I mean, by Hitler's monotesticle I quite nearly believed in the fairy tale that Nazism would've been eradicated by 2020's. So I guess Hitler's "millenia of nazism" still stands despite his architectural autism/failures.
yes! i am useful! for once... is anyone working on this yet cus if not i can do it. i just dont wanna work on it if someone is already doing it and all my work is for naught. do i upload it as a word doc or where do u want the translation?
edit
@Null or if someone volunteered we could split the work so it wouldn't take forever. just glanced at the first page and it says it's addressed to the german people. manifesto vibes right off the back.
Cheerlead-in-Chief
kiwifarms.net
Dlowded his video: the only part of This NeoNazi's 'Manifesto' that Im willing to translate is the second one....but that's it.
@sweetie_squad_4_lyfe. i called dibs on the Second page!
@sweetie_squad_4_lyfe. i called dibs on the Second page!
general gist of first page is hey im gonna tell you about my life. every german should know this. then he mentions a secret service and emphasizes that he's not with any secret service. damn this sounds like itll be a fun ride.
Cheerlead-in-Chief
kiwifarms.net
Title is..some:
I was gonna translate the first title
.
I was gonna translate the first title
.
My wish is to inform everyone what is possible beyond what one might think.
r u doing the pdf or vid?Title is..some:
I was gonna translate the first title
Some parts of the pdf are already translated...
Introduction
This is a message to all German people!
In this writing I will describe what happened to me in life and why every German should know this, also, however long it may take, until this message is proved true and correct.
Before I begin, I want to explain something.
In the middle of this message describes the activity of a so called "secret service." Therefore, I would like to clarify what I mean.
I am a normal citizen, that means I am not an agent of a secret service nor have I ever worked for one. Before a certain event in my life, resulted in my knowing, what a secret service is, does or what means and methods are used, from freely accessible sources, even when very early in my life I had suspicions.
Understandably, everyone who reads this will have their own ideas of what a secret service is or what they do.
My wish is to inform everyone what is possible beyond what one might think.
1. At the time of recording this video thousands of Germans will be monitored by secret service.
2. This happens without a clear cause.
3. When I speak of "monitoring" I mean audio and visual monitoring in private, at the workplace, and other places where people occupy their time. By this I mean cameras that are visibly placed in public or in stores.
4. There are people that work for this secret service that are capable of reading the minds of other people and are capable of linking into someone's mind and up to a certain degree control them remotely.
5. What Edward Snowden revealed a few years ago is in comparison child's play.
When I mention a secret service I don't mean explicitly a known secret service, such as German Secret Service, CIA, or NSA, rather I mean an organization that operates on the basis of a secret service officially named but doesn't operate openly.
This is a message to all German people!
In this writing I will describe what happened to me in life and why every German should know this, also, however long it may take, until this message is proved true and correct.
Before I begin, I want to explain something.
In the middle of this message describes the activity of a so called "secret service." Therefore, I would like to clarify what I mean.
I am a normal citizen, that means I am not an agent of a secret service nor have I ever worked for one. Before a certain event in my life, resulted in my knowing, what a secret service is, does or what means and methods are used, from freely accessible sources, even when very early in my life I had suspicions.
Understandably, everyone who reads this will have their own ideas of what a secret service is or what they do.
My wish is to inform everyone what is possible beyond what one might think.
1. At the time of recording this video thousands of Germans will be monitored by secret service.
2. This happens without a clear cause.
3. When I speak of "monitoring" I mean audio and visual monitoring in private, at the workplace, and other places where people occupy their time. By this I mean cameras that are visibly placed in public or in stores.
4. There are people that work for this secret service that are capable of reading the minds of other people and are capable of linking into someone's mind and up to a certain degree control them remotely.
5. What Edward Snowden revealed a few years ago is in comparison child's play.
When I mention a secret service I don't mean explicitly a known secret service, such as German Secret Service, CIA, or NSA, rather I mean an organization that operates on the basis of a secret service officially named but doesn't operate openly.
damn ill have to check to make sure i dont redo stuff. oh well. either way this is fun. this guy believes in mind control and crazy shit like that
I think the part about women is not translated yet, and the football babble. The translations are on page 3, 4 and 5.
thanks man! also I love your username and profile pic lol
Cheerlead-in-Chief
kiwifarms.net
2nd page PDF. I only could roughly translate the Title as "Mein Kamp- or "My K[german word that's NOT a Traditional German Surname] "
Aoologies.
ok i just did the first page n am gonna try to get what hasnt been done yet. so far this is pretty funny.
DarkieSouls
kiwifarms.net
I'm working on subtitles for the 9 minute long video right now, which is mosty shizo rambling anway, but could be interesting and I'm bored.
I compiled the translations a bit, made some minor corrections and pointed out, which parts still need a translation.
Chapter 1 and 2, Pages 1 to 8 upper half (Introduction, Racist Ramblings)
Chapter 3, Pages 8 lower half to 12 upper half (Strategy for the US)
Translated by @Woodchipper Chaperone
Chapter 4, Pages 12 lower half to 13 upper half (High treason)
Translated by @Woodchipper Chaperone
Chapter 5, Pages 13 lower half to 17 upper half (On Women / Football babble)
- Still missing translation
Chapter 1 and 2, Pages 1 to 8 upper half (Introduction, Racist Ramblings)
[ ... ] = my own notes/comments
1. Image:
Introduction
This is a message to the german people!
In this text I'll explain what happened in my whole life and why every german has to know about it, no mater how long it takes, my message will be confirmed to be true and honest [no pun intended by translator].
Before I'll begin, I first have to declare something: The main piece of my message is about the activities of a so called "Secret Service". So I'll explain it beforehand, what I'm meaning with this.
I am a normal citizen, which means, I'm neither working for a secret service, nor have I ever worked for one. Before a significant event happend in my life, my knowledge stems from freely aquirable sources about what a secret service does and which means and methods it utilizes - but even so, I soon had further speculations in my life [about what a secret service does].
Of course, everyone who will read this, has his own assumptions about what a secret service does or what its work and activities are about.
My goal is it, to inform everyone about, what else is possible [for a secret service], especially if you believe what is in accordance [with the law? =what it is allowed to do]
1.) At the time [right now] of this video recording, thousands of german citizen are under surveillance by a secret service.
2.) This happenes without a specific reason.
3.) When I talk about "surveillance", it is audio-visual surveillance of a privat home, the workplace or other places you are located. By this I don't mean cameras, which are placed in public places or in shops. [so, hidden stuff, you know, get your tin-foil hats ready]
4.) There are people working for this "secret service" which have the power to read other peoples mind and to get into them to remotly control them.
5.) What Edward Snowden made public a few years ago is a "childrens birthday party" if you compare it to this [childrens birthday party is a german idiom for something trivial and harmless].
When I'll talk about a "secret service" in my message, I am not talking about known secret services like the Bundesnachrichtendienst [Germanys goofy secret service], CIA or NSA. It is an organisation utilising a secret service as its base of operations, which [the organisation] does not officially make an appearance.
I will now explain, why I know that I am surveillanced by a secret service and why the confirmation of what I say is extremly important, even if I will no longer be able to experience this myself.
2. Image:
First Suspicions
My life can be divided into two chapters. First the time in which i sometimes thought to myself it could be possible, that I am under surveillance and second the time, from then on I was sure I am under surveillance.
The period of time in which I was suspicios, that a "secret service" was "surveilling" me, can be dated between the day of my birth till September 11th 2001.
I want to start chronologically with the impression I got shortly after my birth.
I can't tell it exactly anymore and it doesn't really matter, if between my birth and my first concious memory/impression which started my real human existence passed 5, 8 or 12 days. [sorry, hard to translate, tl;dr, guy claims he got his first memories shortly after birth. Maybe he is a failed experiment crossing humans and elephants?].
I was in the flat of my parents. My mom hold me in the bathing tub, but shortly afterwards she passed me on to my dad. She obviously had problems holding and bathing me and I can still remember one sentence my mother said: "He is so small...".
3. Image:
Paralel to this first impressions I heard for the first time a voice in my mind, which wasn’t friendly at all: “Oh no, this sucks, I fell into their trap”. I immediately responded to this female voice with “No” and fell asleep soon afterwards.
Looking back I can remember numerous sequences of my first year alive and especially, that I already had the thought that I am under surveillance by other people in this first years [yeah duh, your parents]. This thought based primarily on my first impression of my awakening [the slamdunk tub incident], the voice which I heard in the bathroom and which left a lasting impression inside me.
Also I grasped the concept of being human, the world around me and I came fast to the conclusion, that the people around me – to keep it simple – are not nice to each other all the time or that humans are their own enemies [homo homini lupus est, anyone?].
Of course my question had to be left unanswered, but I came to the conclusion as a little boy, that this [people not being nice to one another] is possible, which of course I did not feel as nice circumstances [d’oh, another douchbaggery sentence in Germany. Tl;dr: People are assholes, me no likey, me so sad].
I never talked to anyone about this speculations as 2-, 6-, or 11-years old and pushed the answer of this question back to adulthood [TL-Problem: The meaning gets a bit lost, he says he himself wants to answer this question when he is grown up].
4. Image:
I don’t want to say, that I always thought about it. But occasionally in my younger years I pondered about if there are people without inhibition to violate my privacy or the privacy of other people. The question I asked myself was, if this is even thinkable or possible.
This question I sadly have to answer for myself with yes. But I couldn’t defend myself against it back then and had to live with my suspicion.
Crucial conversation with a colleague [Banklehre is not easy to translate. The guy received a Training in Bankingstuff, and was a so called Bankkaufmann. It is quite common in Germany at that time not to study this at university but to go to a company and they teach you the stuff directly]
I want to jump to the year 1999, because there an for me in many aspects crucial talk with a colleague [of his training company] happened.
I was 22 at this time, met him in his new flat in Frankfurt [Frankfurt is the biggest city for banking in Germany] and we talked there about a lot of different things.
I’ll retell this conversation not word by word, but I’ll give a recap of the most important aspects.
5. Image:
First I have to emphasize, that I felt this “security service” was also there, because I felt the penetration [in my/his? mind]. [dunno, einklinken means they entered his or his colleagues mind, I thought penetration fits more]
One part of our conversation was crime, or to rephrase it in a better way, the bad behavior of specific ethnic groups, mainly Turks, Maroccans, Libanese, Kurds and so on.
About this we already had some kind of consensus.
We both already had similar experiences at that time from which an aversion against these ethnic groups resulted, so had a consensus here [auf der Gleichen Wellenlänge = on the same wave-length = consensus].
I can file these personal experiences as harmless nowadays, for example provoked conflicts on the way home from school or dumb provocations in night clubs. Harmless because no personal damage in form of injuries or the loss of personal property happened. But I also heard from friends in school and my circle of acquaintances different outcomes of the same provocations which resulted in injuries with [for example] knifes. In the newspapers one could read the end of such things like brawls five foreigners vs. one german with the result of grave injuries and even death.
During my training I experienced a bank-robbery and had to come to the police as a witness to check hundreds of files of potential suspects with them. 90% of these suspects were non-germans. These non-germans were mainly from the south [Südländer = People down south of Germany], so turks and north africans.
Because there were not any similar experiences with germans, I came to a specific personal conclusion resulting from all this experiences and impressions.
This conclusion was based on several steps:
First of all I asked myself the basic question how it could be possible, that these specific ethnic groups are in my country after all [Well, I think there is something called airplane, I dunno…].
These humans are to be rejected by instinct and they have proven in their history to not be competitive/capable [note: so they are the dumdums for our special friend here].
On the other hand I got to know my own people [Volk], as a county in which the best and most beautiful arises what the world has to offer. I can’t point out all the achievements on all scientific branches, but the evidence speaks for itself.
In my eyes, this didn’t fit.
On the one hand my people are responsible to enlighten the whole of human kind, on the other hand specific people helped to import ethnic groups, races or cultures into our midst, which are destructive in all aspects.
6. Image:
I came to the first conclusion, that, if I am on this planet, these people should not be here / should not be allowed to be here. It is absurd/crazy. [note: I dunno if he means they should not be in Germany or that they should not exist at all]
But these people are particularly numerous on our planet and it seems they are not willing to stop their propagation voluntarily. On the contrary, they feel particularly awesome, even though they are not, so there is a problem which needs a solution [oh come on, we had this talk 80 years ago. Didn’t worked out quite well for us back then…]
My other conclusion was:
To send them back to their home countries can’t be the solution anymore, because the existence of certain ethnic groups is an error itself and with deportation we only postpone the problem towards future generations. It can’t be anyway, that I have to think about/deal with this problem or that future generations would have to think about/deal with this problem in the future.
So I proclaim, that the following people have to be destroyed completely:
Marocco, Algeria, Tunesia, Libya, Egypt, Israel, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, the whole of the Saudi-arabic peninsula, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Kazachstan, Turkmenistan, Usbekistan, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodchia even the Phillipines [dude, we. had. this. talk].
And this would only be the first rough cleansing. We would have to do a subtle cleansing afterwards in the rest of the African states, South- and Central America, the Caribbean and of course our own people.
I have to note, that not everyone who has a german passport by now is of pure race and valuable. I can imagine to decimate the current population by half.
If I would have a button which could turn this to reality, I would not hesitate to push it. You couldn’t see how fast I would press it. The only condition would be for me, that this would happen in one second, so I would not be guilty of or am interested in the suffering of these people, because it could be possible that there is an endless circle of life in this universe. So I could be the very person in another life, that I want to destroy right now.
But I would eliminate all those people, even if we talk about billions here, it has to be done, especially because we want to reach a common ultimate goal: “The solution of the riddle”.
Because, I want to emphasize this, we have not created paradise on earth by what we have done [the cleansing] and no one can believe, this would be a satisfactory result when 500 millions of people with germanic descend roam the earth.
With “the solution of the riddle” I mean, that the only important thing for us humans is to gain knowledge what actually is happening here. How can an universe emerge, what is it all about, how can life emerge, how could man emerge, where does it all go. [yeah, there is something called science, dumdum]
So, systematically enforce enlightenment, either by scientific means or spiritually.
7. and 8. Page
Now, this is an incredible task and it will need thousands of generation to come while there is no precise way to tell how much time it will need, be it 2.000, 5.000 or 300.000 years – if it succeeds at all.
If mankind even succeeds in this task is also a question which could be answered with no, because it could be possible, that we are no “winning race” [Siegerspezies… Some kind of like dominant species].
“Winning race” is solely defined by the fact if we solved the riddle. It is not linked to us reaching an average age of 120 years or eradicating cancer, building houses 2 kilometres high or reaching the most distant planets.
Also we have to travel in a time warp [Zeitschleife: Time loop, Think of it as Groundhog Day, Racist edition] and destroy the very planet we call home, many billion years before life first emerged on it. Because we can’t let that re-emerge, what all happened on earth, the million-grade suffering of human kind.
In this mission, which is the only ever relevant one, we don’t have time endlessly, because we have to count in natural disasters, which may not eliminate us completely before we reached or goal but would set us back decisively.
Up until now, only a few ethnic groups or races emerged with positive aspects. Other races and cultures did not contribute anything, on the contrary they are distructive, namely islam.
This is how I came to my conclusion to eliminate the countries named above, their population included. Only by this means humankind has a chance to “solve the riddle”, because we will not solve it with a numerical majority of idiots [Vollidioten = full idiots. Thankfully, we have one Vollidiot less, I’m only sad he didn’t just killed himself but has to go on a killing-spree before].
Of course back then in this conversation and also today I’m conscious about my claims and their importance. So I’ll add the question: If my ideas get rejected, how should mankind evolve further?
If you deny racial differences and connected with them different performances, then you have to be convinced, that all this differences stem from other causes and are only temporary with the possibility of a positive development.
If so, there is the question: How exactly is this development designed and how would it be carried out?
Because it is impossible to let in billions of people into our territory to give them better living conditions, you would have to go to them [so we make a home-visit…I’m already scared what this dude proposes next].
So, not immigration to us, but help on site.
This help on site can be in different humanitarian acts and is already practiced since decades.
But there are not only the problems like missing medical facilities, hunger and no educational system – there is the more pressuring problem of a corrupt, criminal regime has power over its own people and let them live in hell, either out of lust for power or religious blindness.
There exists torture and murder by the thousands and the so-called west can’t put a stop to it. So this can’t be the solution.
Back then I emphasized two countries, namely Afghanistan and Iraq, which are geographically as well as politically the center of evil and backwardness and which have to be developed by the west.
For this, I sketched out concrete tactics and a basic strategy for a successful military occupation of these regimes.
I won’t give the details here and link to my website www.tobias-rathjen.de [don’t bother, it is 403ed, probably by the “secret service”].
If you wage war, we can also test two essential theses for the future of man-kind:
1.) Can these ethnic groups develop for the better or…
2.) Is all hope lost and total annihilation legitime
My point of view back then and also now is, that thesis 2) is accurate. The following generations can check, if I was right or not.
1. Image:
Introduction
This is a message to the german people!
In this text I'll explain what happened in my whole life and why every german has to know about it, no mater how long it takes, my message will be confirmed to be true and honest [no pun intended by translator].
Before I'll begin, I first have to declare something: The main piece of my message is about the activities of a so called "Secret Service". So I'll explain it beforehand, what I'm meaning with this.
I am a normal citizen, which means, I'm neither working for a secret service, nor have I ever worked for one. Before a significant event happend in my life, my knowledge stems from freely aquirable sources about what a secret service does and which means and methods it utilizes - but even so, I soon had further speculations in my life [about what a secret service does].
Of course, everyone who will read this, has his own assumptions about what a secret service does or what its work and activities are about.
My goal is it, to inform everyone about, what else is possible [for a secret service], especially if you believe what is in accordance [with the law? =what it is allowed to do]
1.) At the time [right now] of this video recording, thousands of german citizen are under surveillance by a secret service.
2.) This happenes without a specific reason.
3.) When I talk about "surveillance", it is audio-visual surveillance of a privat home, the workplace or other places you are located. By this I don't mean cameras, which are placed in public places or in shops. [so, hidden stuff, you know, get your tin-foil hats ready]
4.) There are people working for this "secret service" which have the power to read other peoples mind and to get into them to remotly control them.
5.) What Edward Snowden made public a few years ago is a "childrens birthday party" if you compare it to this [childrens birthday party is a german idiom for something trivial and harmless].
When I'll talk about a "secret service" in my message, I am not talking about known secret services like the Bundesnachrichtendienst [Germanys goofy secret service], CIA or NSA. It is an organisation utilising a secret service as its base of operations, which [the organisation] does not officially make an appearance.
I will now explain, why I know that I am surveillanced by a secret service and why the confirmation of what I say is extremly important, even if I will no longer be able to experience this myself.
2. Image:
First Suspicions
My life can be divided into two chapters. First the time in which i sometimes thought to myself it could be possible, that I am under surveillance and second the time, from then on I was sure I am under surveillance.
The period of time in which I was suspicios, that a "secret service" was "surveilling" me, can be dated between the day of my birth till September 11th 2001.
I want to start chronologically with the impression I got shortly after my birth.
I can't tell it exactly anymore and it doesn't really matter, if between my birth and my first concious memory/impression which started my real human existence passed 5, 8 or 12 days. [sorry, hard to translate, tl;dr, guy claims he got his first memories shortly after birth. Maybe he is a failed experiment crossing humans and elephants?].
I was in the flat of my parents. My mom hold me in the bathing tub, but shortly afterwards she passed me on to my dad. She obviously had problems holding and bathing me and I can still remember one sentence my mother said: "He is so small...".
3. Image:
Paralel to this first impressions I heard for the first time a voice in my mind, which wasn’t friendly at all: “Oh no, this sucks, I fell into their trap”. I immediately responded to this female voice with “No” and fell asleep soon afterwards.
Looking back I can remember numerous sequences of my first year alive and especially, that I already had the thought that I am under surveillance by other people in this first years [yeah duh, your parents]. This thought based primarily on my first impression of my awakening [the slamdunk tub incident], the voice which I heard in the bathroom and which left a lasting impression inside me.
Also I grasped the concept of being human, the world around me and I came fast to the conclusion, that the people around me – to keep it simple – are not nice to each other all the time or that humans are their own enemies [homo homini lupus est, anyone?].
Of course my question had to be left unanswered, but I came to the conclusion as a little boy, that this [people not being nice to one another] is possible, which of course I did not feel as nice circumstances [d’oh, another douchbaggery sentence in Germany. Tl;dr: People are assholes, me no likey, me so sad].
I never talked to anyone about this speculations as 2-, 6-, or 11-years old and pushed the answer of this question back to adulthood [TL-Problem: The meaning gets a bit lost, he says he himself wants to answer this question when he is grown up].
4. Image:
I don’t want to say, that I always thought about it. But occasionally in my younger years I pondered about if there are people without inhibition to violate my privacy or the privacy of other people. The question I asked myself was, if this is even thinkable or possible.
This question I sadly have to answer for myself with yes. But I couldn’t defend myself against it back then and had to live with my suspicion.
Crucial conversation with a colleague [Banklehre is not easy to translate. The guy received a Training in Bankingstuff, and was a so called Bankkaufmann. It is quite common in Germany at that time not to study this at university but to go to a company and they teach you the stuff directly]
I want to jump to the year 1999, because there an for me in many aspects crucial talk with a colleague [of his training company] happened.
I was 22 at this time, met him in his new flat in Frankfurt [Frankfurt is the biggest city for banking in Germany] and we talked there about a lot of different things.
I’ll retell this conversation not word by word, but I’ll give a recap of the most important aspects.
5. Image:
First I have to emphasize, that I felt this “security service” was also there, because I felt the penetration [in my/his? mind]. [dunno, einklinken means they entered his or his colleagues mind, I thought penetration fits more]
One part of our conversation was crime, or to rephrase it in a better way, the bad behavior of specific ethnic groups, mainly Turks, Maroccans, Libanese, Kurds and so on.
About this we already had some kind of consensus.
We both already had similar experiences at that time from which an aversion against these ethnic groups resulted, so had a consensus here [auf der Gleichen Wellenlänge = on the same wave-length = consensus].
I can file these personal experiences as harmless nowadays, for example provoked conflicts on the way home from school or dumb provocations in night clubs. Harmless because no personal damage in form of injuries or the loss of personal property happened. But I also heard from friends in school and my circle of acquaintances different outcomes of the same provocations which resulted in injuries with [for example] knifes. In the newspapers one could read the end of such things like brawls five foreigners vs. one german with the result of grave injuries and even death.
During my training I experienced a bank-robbery and had to come to the police as a witness to check hundreds of files of potential suspects with them. 90% of these suspects were non-germans. These non-germans were mainly from the south [Südländer = People down south of Germany], so turks and north africans.
Because there were not any similar experiences with germans, I came to a specific personal conclusion resulting from all this experiences and impressions.
This conclusion was based on several steps:
First of all I asked myself the basic question how it could be possible, that these specific ethnic groups are in my country after all [Well, I think there is something called airplane, I dunno…].
These humans are to be rejected by instinct and they have proven in their history to not be competitive/capable [note: so they are the dumdums for our special friend here].
On the other hand I got to know my own people [Volk], as a county in which the best and most beautiful arises what the world has to offer. I can’t point out all the achievements on all scientific branches, but the evidence speaks for itself.
In my eyes, this didn’t fit.
On the one hand my people are responsible to enlighten the whole of human kind, on the other hand specific people helped to import ethnic groups, races or cultures into our midst, which are destructive in all aspects.
6. Image:
I came to the first conclusion, that, if I am on this planet, these people should not be here / should not be allowed to be here. It is absurd/crazy. [note: I dunno if he means they should not be in Germany or that they should not exist at all]
But these people are particularly numerous on our planet and it seems they are not willing to stop their propagation voluntarily. On the contrary, they feel particularly awesome, even though they are not, so there is a problem which needs a solution [oh come on, we had this talk 80 years ago. Didn’t worked out quite well for us back then…]
My other conclusion was:
To send them back to their home countries can’t be the solution anymore, because the existence of certain ethnic groups is an error itself and with deportation we only postpone the problem towards future generations. It can’t be anyway, that I have to think about/deal with this problem or that future generations would have to think about/deal with this problem in the future.
So I proclaim, that the following people have to be destroyed completely:
Marocco, Algeria, Tunesia, Libya, Egypt, Israel, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, the whole of the Saudi-arabic peninsula, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Kazachstan, Turkmenistan, Usbekistan, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodchia even the Phillipines [dude, we. had. this. talk].
And this would only be the first rough cleansing. We would have to do a subtle cleansing afterwards in the rest of the African states, South- and Central America, the Caribbean and of course our own people.
I have to note, that not everyone who has a german passport by now is of pure race and valuable. I can imagine to decimate the current population by half.
If I would have a button which could turn this to reality, I would not hesitate to push it. You couldn’t see how fast I would press it. The only condition would be for me, that this would happen in one second, so I would not be guilty of or am interested in the suffering of these people, because it could be possible that there is an endless circle of life in this universe. So I could be the very person in another life, that I want to destroy right now.
But I would eliminate all those people, even if we talk about billions here, it has to be done, especially because we want to reach a common ultimate goal: “The solution of the riddle”.
Because, I want to emphasize this, we have not created paradise on earth by what we have done [the cleansing] and no one can believe, this would be a satisfactory result when 500 millions of people with germanic descend roam the earth.
With “the solution of the riddle” I mean, that the only important thing for us humans is to gain knowledge what actually is happening here. How can an universe emerge, what is it all about, how can life emerge, how could man emerge, where does it all go. [yeah, there is something called science, dumdum]
So, systematically enforce enlightenment, either by scientific means or spiritually.
7. and 8. Page
Now, this is an incredible task and it will need thousands of generation to come while there is no precise way to tell how much time it will need, be it 2.000, 5.000 or 300.000 years – if it succeeds at all.
If mankind even succeeds in this task is also a question which could be answered with no, because it could be possible, that we are no “winning race” [Siegerspezies… Some kind of like dominant species].
“Winning race” is solely defined by the fact if we solved the riddle. It is not linked to us reaching an average age of 120 years or eradicating cancer, building houses 2 kilometres high or reaching the most distant planets.
Also we have to travel in a time warp [Zeitschleife: Time loop, Think of it as Groundhog Day, Racist edition] and destroy the very planet we call home, many billion years before life first emerged on it. Because we can’t let that re-emerge, what all happened on earth, the million-grade suffering of human kind.
In this mission, which is the only ever relevant one, we don’t have time endlessly, because we have to count in natural disasters, which may not eliminate us completely before we reached or goal but would set us back decisively.
Up until now, only a few ethnic groups or races emerged with positive aspects. Other races and cultures did not contribute anything, on the contrary they are distructive, namely islam.
This is how I came to my conclusion to eliminate the countries named above, their population included. Only by this means humankind has a chance to “solve the riddle”, because we will not solve it with a numerical majority of idiots [Vollidioten = full idiots. Thankfully, we have one Vollidiot less, I’m only sad he didn’t just killed himself but has to go on a killing-spree before].
Of course back then in this conversation and also today I’m conscious about my claims and their importance. So I’ll add the question: If my ideas get rejected, how should mankind evolve further?
If you deny racial differences and connected with them different performances, then you have to be convinced, that all this differences stem from other causes and are only temporary with the possibility of a positive development.
If so, there is the question: How exactly is this development designed and how would it be carried out?
Because it is impossible to let in billions of people into our territory to give them better living conditions, you would have to go to them [so we make a home-visit…I’m already scared what this dude proposes next].
So, not immigration to us, but help on site.
This help on site can be in different humanitarian acts and is already practiced since decades.
But there are not only the problems like missing medical facilities, hunger and no educational system – there is the more pressuring problem of a corrupt, criminal regime has power over its own people and let them live in hell, either out of lust for power or religious blindness.
There exists torture and murder by the thousands and the so-called west can’t put a stop to it. So this can’t be the solution.
Back then I emphasized two countries, namely Afghanistan and Iraq, which are geographically as well as politically the center of evil and backwardness and which have to be developed by the west.
For this, I sketched out concrete tactics and a basic strategy for a successful military occupation of these regimes.
I won’t give the details here and link to my website www.tobias-rathjen.de [don’t bother, it is 403ed, probably by the “secret service”].
If you wage war, we can also test two essential theses for the future of man-kind:
1.) Can these ethnic groups develop for the better or…
2.) Is all hope lost and total annihilation legitime
My point of view back then and also now is, that thesis 2) is accurate. The following generations can check, if I was right or not.
Chapter 3, Pages 8 lower half to 12 upper half (Strategy for the US)
Translated by @Woodchipper Chaperone
Since the USA were the only (world) power to conduct these wars, I began looking into the situation of the USA in discussions.
The USA were the #1 world power in the year 1999.
My question was, but will they still be it in the future?
A look at the past lets me realize that all world powers, you can also include all empires and ancient civilizations that people created, will collapse after a certain time period. If there’s a sort of natural cycle of creation, growth and collapse, then logically, the USA too won’t be able to prevent its growth and fall.
Thus, predicting the fall of the USA doesn’t require an intellectual masterstroke.
I was sure that in 5 or 10 years the USA will still remain a or be the only world power. But what about 20, 30 or 40 years? What about China? It is possible that this country, based on the sheer size of its population, can at some point, but possibly around the year 2040, compete with the USA for the title of “superpower”.
I pointed out a possible scenario, that I could imagine, that in the year 2040, when I too am retired, the case would happen where the USA won’t be the #1 anymore, since the country’s “elites” don’t know what to do.
In that moment I began coming up with a strategy that allows the USA to remain a superpower beyond the year 2040.
The goal is to remain economically and militarily at the top of their game.
First off on the economy.
What makes an economic superpower?
Naturally you’d measure it with the GDP, therefore the USA and China will eventually reach the same level.
One has to point out however, that the economic power isn’t only tied to the GDP or having large market shares in many industries, e.g. 75% for washing machines or 80% for electric razors, but also if the nation is able to create progress-enabling innovations, like the invention of the telephone, car, airplane, rocket, computer, medical drugs etc.
At the current point in time, i.e. in the year 1999, I pictured the situation like this:
China isn’t yet a country that excels in high-tech, i.e. invents things on a notable scale.
Many western companies have helped China, be it from a desire to reduce manufacturing costs to allow one to compete better in the domestic market or to be the first to gain access to a large, lucrative market in the future.
Furthermore, you need to take in account, that the Chinese leadership will themselves try to become independent from the know-how of the West, to eventually be able to produce the most up-to-date products and services themselves. This will be a matter of time.
This presented the following picture to me:
This possible ascent of China is not only going to be a natural process that cannot be stopped, thanks to the conscientiousness of the Chinese people and the intelligence of the Chinese leadership, but we, the so called “West”, will be culpable for this development.
The base issue can be described as follows:
We don’t speak of a “homogenous body” when we talk about the West. We are in direct competition amongst each other, therefore it will, from a micro-perspective, i.e. short term profits, always remain a lucrative solution for nations or companies to make business deals with China.
Therefore, we need to create a new organization that functions similarly to NATO and poses as an economic defensive pact against China. The primary goal of this organization needs to be that our high-tech doesn’t get into the hands of the Chinese, e.g. a form of tech-barrier needs to be created and monitored.
To emphasize this necessity, I will provide you this example:
Let’s assume that, in the next few decades, there will be 18 key technologies that are known world-wide, whereas I define them as technologies that not only have the potential to create entirely new economic sectors, but also have the power to eliminate entire industrial sectors as well.
Without such an organization, it will be possible for China to gain access to 8 such technologies, be it through voluntary tech-transfer or through copying resp. espionage.
With such an organization or through one’s own effort it could be reduced to one or two.
In conclusion: Should China be able to catch up to the USA by the year 2040, then it will be primarily our own fault, since the West wasn’t providing a bulwark against their enemy and instead put short term profits above long-term success.
Besides China, there’s another country that needs to be focused on: Mexico.
I already suspected back in 1999 that the NAFTA-agreement won’t turn out to be advantageous to the USA, whereas I have to differentiate between two perspectives. For American businesses, i.e. the perspective of business leadership, it can be attractive to shift production to Mexico, which makes sense on a business level. But from a perspective of what is good for the country, this would free trade agreement would turn out to be negative, since workplaces and entire industrial sectors would get lost, which in turn cannot be in the interest of the country or its people, especially when these can’t be replaced by equivalent or new industries.
Back then I could only assume the today known trade deficits with China and Mexico.
This problem can be resolved fairly easily, by creating a “wall” that spans all the way against Mexico.
Back to China. Independent of the question whether China will succeed in catching up with the USA by the year 2040, there’s another side to this coin, namely the militaristic power.
In this aspect the difference was and still is even more obvious.
But we are talking about possible scenarios 40 years into the future.
Should China be able to catch up with the USA economically, then they’d also have the resources to create a suitable militaristic superpower.
Assuming that today’s head-start still remains for decades, this won’t be advantageous.
E.g. the first conclusion is as follows: something needs to happen, which exceeds the idea of keeping the defense budget at the same levels and “betting on” combat systems that you need to replace piece by piece, like for example new fighter jets, combat helicopters, aircraft carriers, missile defense systems etc.
In my opinion is military power measured through troops that have practical combat experience.
Therefore, is the question whether it’s a superpower or not, purely fictitious when I don’t use the power I could use.
Thus the question I posed at the beginning, “what can I do from today’s perspective to retain the status quo”, turns out to be the wrong question – since the collapse is inevitable, resp. the successful circumnavigation of the China-challenge only delays the actual problem instead of solving it.
The real question is: what do I do with the time in which I have the power and means, how do I make use of being a superpower?
My solution is: There are enough despots, tyrants and criminal regimes in the world which don’t pose a militaristic threat, but need to be removed on moral and humanitarian grounds.
Now you can combine two things with each other.
First, using the power for the good of mankind, and second giving your army training opportunities that no peacekeeping mission can afford.
Besides training of the entire military hierarchy and tactics is also the aspect of innovation the key issue. Since at the end of the day you can only see what works (be it equipment, technology and tactics) and what doesn’t in a practical situation, is war the best way to evolve the military.
My advice is: Put your military machine through a war, since only this really makes you better. And when you free Afghanistan and Iraq you also do something good.
To not overextend your resources, you need to take a break to consolidate for 20 years.
In 2030 you can again start with training your military.
This training should guarantee that by 2040 your military machine is on a level that keeps you as the #1 superpower, even if economic parity [with China] has happened.
This strategy is also resistant in terms of espionage, since it’s not always possible to exclude that a foreign secret service gains access to information about one of your weapons, e.g. technical details, and in turn will be able to recreate a copy.
If a division or the whole army is sent into combat, they learn how to do things better, processes change and adapt, the quality and power of the army isn’t measured in just the number of tanks or their armors, but also with the practical experience of the people that use it in hostile situations. This can’t be copied unless you wage war yourself.
In comparison to previous wars of the USA, like Vietnam, Korea or the Second World War, will the casualties in these missions be significantly smaller. I expected 2’000 to 3’00 deaths to be realistic back then. Losses of allied states weren’t included.
In conclusion, my strategic suggestion for the USA is:
Phase 1, focus on strengthening your army through wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, then in phase 2 you can strengthen your own economy by focusing on the imbalance in the business relations with Mexico and China.
Here I also mentioned that a billionaire (for phase 2) should take charge, since his personality would allow him to be the most capable to set course for the USA’s economy.
Back then I was still thinking about the defeat of Ross Perot.
My strategy is currently being implemented in the USA!
This is a great honor for me!
The story isn’t over yet however.
The USA were the #1 world power in the year 1999.
My question was, but will they still be it in the future?
A look at the past lets me realize that all world powers, you can also include all empires and ancient civilizations that people created, will collapse after a certain time period. If there’s a sort of natural cycle of creation, growth and collapse, then logically, the USA too won’t be able to prevent its growth and fall.
Thus, predicting the fall of the USA doesn’t require an intellectual masterstroke.
I was sure that in 5 or 10 years the USA will still remain a or be the only world power. But what about 20, 30 or 40 years? What about China? It is possible that this country, based on the sheer size of its population, can at some point, but possibly around the year 2040, compete with the USA for the title of “superpower”.
I pointed out a possible scenario, that I could imagine, that in the year 2040, when I too am retired, the case would happen where the USA won’t be the #1 anymore, since the country’s “elites” don’t know what to do.
In that moment I began coming up with a strategy that allows the USA to remain a superpower beyond the year 2040.
The goal is to remain economically and militarily at the top of their game.
First off on the economy.
What makes an economic superpower?
Naturally you’d measure it with the GDP, therefore the USA and China will eventually reach the same level.
One has to point out however, that the economic power isn’t only tied to the GDP or having large market shares in many industries, e.g. 75% for washing machines or 80% for electric razors, but also if the nation is able to create progress-enabling innovations, like the invention of the telephone, car, airplane, rocket, computer, medical drugs etc.
At the current point in time, i.e. in the year 1999, I pictured the situation like this:
China isn’t yet a country that excels in high-tech, i.e. invents things on a notable scale.
Many western companies have helped China, be it from a desire to reduce manufacturing costs to allow one to compete better in the domestic market or to be the first to gain access to a large, lucrative market in the future.
Furthermore, you need to take in account, that the Chinese leadership will themselves try to become independent from the know-how of the West, to eventually be able to produce the most up-to-date products and services themselves. This will be a matter of time.
This presented the following picture to me:
This possible ascent of China is not only going to be a natural process that cannot be stopped, thanks to the conscientiousness of the Chinese people and the intelligence of the Chinese leadership, but we, the so called “West”, will be culpable for this development.
The base issue can be described as follows:
We don’t speak of a “homogenous body” when we talk about the West. We are in direct competition amongst each other, therefore it will, from a micro-perspective, i.e. short term profits, always remain a lucrative solution for nations or companies to make business deals with China.
Therefore, we need to create a new organization that functions similarly to NATO and poses as an economic defensive pact against China. The primary goal of this organization needs to be that our high-tech doesn’t get into the hands of the Chinese, e.g. a form of tech-barrier needs to be created and monitored.
To emphasize this necessity, I will provide you this example:
Let’s assume that, in the next few decades, there will be 18 key technologies that are known world-wide, whereas I define them as technologies that not only have the potential to create entirely new economic sectors, but also have the power to eliminate entire industrial sectors as well.
Without such an organization, it will be possible for China to gain access to 8 such technologies, be it through voluntary tech-transfer or through copying resp. espionage.
With such an organization or through one’s own effort it could be reduced to one or two.
In conclusion: Should China be able to catch up to the USA by the year 2040, then it will be primarily our own fault, since the West wasn’t providing a bulwark against their enemy and instead put short term profits above long-term success.
Besides China, there’s another country that needs to be focused on: Mexico.
I already suspected back in 1999 that the NAFTA-agreement won’t turn out to be advantageous to the USA, whereas I have to differentiate between two perspectives. For American businesses, i.e. the perspective of business leadership, it can be attractive to shift production to Mexico, which makes sense on a business level. But from a perspective of what is good for the country, this would free trade agreement would turn out to be negative, since workplaces and entire industrial sectors would get lost, which in turn cannot be in the interest of the country or its people, especially when these can’t be replaced by equivalent or new industries.
Back then I could only assume the today known trade deficits with China and Mexico.
This problem can be resolved fairly easily, by creating a “wall” that spans all the way against Mexico.
Back to China. Independent of the question whether China will succeed in catching up with the USA by the year 2040, there’s another side to this coin, namely the militaristic power.
In this aspect the difference was and still is even more obvious.
But we are talking about possible scenarios 40 years into the future.
Should China be able to catch up with the USA economically, then they’d also have the resources to create a suitable militaristic superpower.
Assuming that today’s head-start still remains for decades, this won’t be advantageous.
E.g. the first conclusion is as follows: something needs to happen, which exceeds the idea of keeping the defense budget at the same levels and “betting on” combat systems that you need to replace piece by piece, like for example new fighter jets, combat helicopters, aircraft carriers, missile defense systems etc.
In my opinion is military power measured through troops that have practical combat experience.
Therefore, is the question whether it’s a superpower or not, purely fictitious when I don’t use the power I could use.
Thus the question I posed at the beginning, “what can I do from today’s perspective to retain the status quo”, turns out to be the wrong question – since the collapse is inevitable, resp. the successful circumnavigation of the China-challenge only delays the actual problem instead of solving it.
The real question is: what do I do with the time in which I have the power and means, how do I make use of being a superpower?
My solution is: There are enough despots, tyrants and criminal regimes in the world which don’t pose a militaristic threat, but need to be removed on moral and humanitarian grounds.
Now you can combine two things with each other.
First, using the power for the good of mankind, and second giving your army training opportunities that no peacekeeping mission can afford.
Besides training of the entire military hierarchy and tactics is also the aspect of innovation the key issue. Since at the end of the day you can only see what works (be it equipment, technology and tactics) and what doesn’t in a practical situation, is war the best way to evolve the military.
My advice is: Put your military machine through a war, since only this really makes you better. And when you free Afghanistan and Iraq you also do something good.
To not overextend your resources, you need to take a break to consolidate for 20 years.
In 2030 you can again start with training your military.
This training should guarantee that by 2040 your military machine is on a level that keeps you as the #1 superpower, even if economic parity [with China] has happened.
This strategy is also resistant in terms of espionage, since it’s not always possible to exclude that a foreign secret service gains access to information about one of your weapons, e.g. technical details, and in turn will be able to recreate a copy.
If a division or the whole army is sent into combat, they learn how to do things better, processes change and adapt, the quality and power of the army isn’t measured in just the number of tanks or their armors, but also with the practical experience of the people that use it in hostile situations. This can’t be copied unless you wage war yourself.
In comparison to previous wars of the USA, like Vietnam, Korea or the Second World War, will the casualties in these missions be significantly smaller. I expected 2’000 to 3’00 deaths to be realistic back then. Losses of allied states weren’t included.
In conclusion, my strategic suggestion for the USA is:
Phase 1, focus on strengthening your army through wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, then in phase 2 you can strengthen your own economy by focusing on the imbalance in the business relations with Mexico and China.
Here I also mentioned that a billionaire (for phase 2) should take charge, since his personality would allow him to be the most capable to set course for the USA’s economy.
Back then I was still thinking about the defeat of Ross Perot.
My strategy is currently being implemented in the USA!
This is a great honor for me!
The story isn’t over yet however.
Chapter 4, Pages 12 lower half to 13 upper half (High treason)
Translated by @Woodchipper Chaperone
Already 20 years ago I arrived at the conclusion, during the problem analysis of why Germany allows this criminality from foreigners, that the criminal foreigners are only one side of the coin because on the other side are Germans, who are either ignorant or too weak or stupid to solve this issue, i.e. deport all of them.
This could be a consequence of historical reasons or an error in information, empathy or “bad experiences”.
Therefore, you should, if you want to solve the problem of “Ausländerkriminalität” (foreign crime), not hastily attack the “foreign enemy” but rather defeat the “inner enemy”.
This inner enemy can be yourself or the [country’s] people.
Since I, as already mentioned, have the impression or suspicion that the secret service is listening in on this discussion, I explained myself as follows:
Imagine we both are sitting here and being eavesdropped, while at the same time we’re talking, only a few kilometers away, a foreigner is committing a crime.
This would be a complete travesty and impertinence without equal since this would mean that Germans would surveil other Germans without reason, while at the same time crimes are committed by foreigners against Germans, which aren’t prevented, even though they could have been prevented easily, which means that it’s treason in two ways.
I went so far that I said, when I inherit the house of my parents, I would sell it to use the profits to shine a light on this issue.
But it didn’t come to this since said “secret agents” now are playing a malicious game with me.
As the last point, which is more of a side issue, less than two years later [the attacks on] September 11th, 2001 happened.
This could be a consequence of historical reasons or an error in information, empathy or “bad experiences”.
Therefore, you should, if you want to solve the problem of “Ausländerkriminalität” (foreign crime), not hastily attack the “foreign enemy” but rather defeat the “inner enemy”.
This inner enemy can be yourself or the [country’s] people.
Since I, as already mentioned, have the impression or suspicion that the secret service is listening in on this discussion, I explained myself as follows:
Imagine we both are sitting here and being eavesdropped, while at the same time we’re talking, only a few kilometers away, a foreigner is committing a crime.
This would be a complete travesty and impertinence without equal since this would mean that Germans would surveil other Germans without reason, while at the same time crimes are committed by foreigners against Germans, which aren’t prevented, even though they could have been prevented easily, which means that it’s treason in two ways.
I went so far that I said, when I inherit the house of my parents, I would sell it to use the profits to shine a light on this issue.
But it didn’t come to this since said “secret agents” now are playing a malicious game with me.
As the last point, which is more of a side issue, less than two years later [the attacks on] September 11th, 2001 happened.
Chapter 5, Pages 13 lower half to 17 upper half (On Women / Football babble)
- Still missing translation
And the second part
Chapter 6, Pages 17 lower half to 19 upper half (On Hollywood / They stole my ideas!)
Translated by @Woodchipper Chaperone
Chapter 7, Pages 19 lower half to 20 upper half (Linking into the brain / Scizo-Stuff)
Translated by @Woodchipper Chaperone
The rest is still not translated. The other two PDFs (Football Tactics Babble and Afghanistan/Iraq Tactics babble) are still not translated as well.
Chapter 6, Pages 17 lower half to 19 upper half (On Hollywood / They stole my ideas!)
Translated by @Woodchipper Chaperone
Now I want to talk about a topic that doesn’t fit in here, but still has a decisive relevance.
The secret service that is surveilling me, is influencing which Hollywood movies are made resp. which topics are being made movies about.
One of the topics of discussion with my colleagues during my banking internship was movies, and which ones I would like to see in the cinemas resp. how they should look like.
Here are four examples:
Since I consider Sharon Stone to be an attractive woman and still do, I said that I’d like it if I could see a second part to Basic Instinct; this movie should take place in England.
It would be interesting if Tom Cruise would play a hitman sometime since this would be outside of his usual scope of roles.
And beyond that, I once explained more in-depth two aspects of a Series resp. how it should be set up.
I explained to him that, as a young boy, I saw “Escape from Alcatraz” starring Clint Eastwood on TV, which I found to be very exciting. How the story was explained, how someone manages to escape prison, although I did find it sad that the movie was over and how I’d have liked to see more, i.e. it should somehow continue. That’s when I came up with the idea that such a movie should be shot again, but not as a movie (i.e. more than 90 or 120 minutes), but as a series, and the story should be spread over 10 hours. That way you could create a whole new dimension of excitement. Furthermore, you could also film the time after the break out as well in a new season.
This was realized with the TV-series “Prison Break” – and pretty well I might add.
Thus I have in retrospect unknowingly presented the basic idea, but naturally, I didn’t write the script, nor did I pick the actors, nor did I do anything else to realize this season [sic].
The same, i.e. presenting the basic structure, can I say about the series “Vikings”.
Here too I had the idea, that it would be interesting and exciting, to tell the story of the Vikings using Hollywood power. Starting from the first sea crossings to England, the pillaging over there, the way of life, the first moments of contact with a new religion – Christendom, the conquest of Paris. I still remember, that I mentioned, that it’s important in such an epic, you need to film as much in nature as possible, i.e. abstain as much as possible from using studio scenes.
I could present more examples, but I am sure that it’s obvious that this isn’t a coincidence anymore.
During the summer semester, when I talked in the apartment with the presumed eavesdroppers, I said among other things, that this situation that I’m being surveilled – I already hinted at, that I would defend myself against that – if necessary I would fly an airplane into a building to get the necessary attention – would go down in history and Hollywood movies would be made about me.
I would only become aware of how correct I was back then when I uttered those words much later.
Not only would movies be inspired by me after September 11th, 2001, but the Hollywood-connection already existed before that.
In hidden ways, i.e. in the movie format where people dealing with their own resp. the extraordinary powers they have access to and are unknown to the public, sometimes more and sometimes less correct.
Here a few examples:
“Look Who’s TalkingNow” – The viewers hear the thoughts of the children in this movie – in reality can these people read my resp. the thoughts of every person.
“The Cell” with Jennifer Lopez – This movie shows a woman, that has the special gift to jack into the brain of a person. Concretely she connects with the brain of a murderer to do some good, namely, save a missing woman from dying – in reality, this is only used with me or other people, without any concrete reasoning and to steal the entirety of one’s privacy.
“Starship Troopers” – This movie revolves around a not too far future, in which special military units have access to “telepathic powers” – this has already been the case for a long time.
There may be many other sequences from movies and series, which are however not known to me and therefore I can’t or have to list here.
In conclusion, I want to emphasize with these examples, that just this ability, “reading minds” and “jacking into the brain of other people”, is being processed through film by the same organization, that has access to this ability!
The secret service that is surveilling me, is influencing which Hollywood movies are made resp. which topics are being made movies about.
One of the topics of discussion with my colleagues during my banking internship was movies, and which ones I would like to see in the cinemas resp. how they should look like.
Here are four examples:
Since I consider Sharon Stone to be an attractive woman and still do, I said that I’d like it if I could see a second part to Basic Instinct; this movie should take place in England.
It would be interesting if Tom Cruise would play a hitman sometime since this would be outside of his usual scope of roles.
And beyond that, I once explained more in-depth two aspects of a Series resp. how it should be set up.
I explained to him that, as a young boy, I saw “Escape from Alcatraz” starring Clint Eastwood on TV, which I found to be very exciting. How the story was explained, how someone manages to escape prison, although I did find it sad that the movie was over and how I’d have liked to see more, i.e. it should somehow continue. That’s when I came up with the idea that such a movie should be shot again, but not as a movie (i.e. more than 90 or 120 minutes), but as a series, and the story should be spread over 10 hours. That way you could create a whole new dimension of excitement. Furthermore, you could also film the time after the break out as well in a new season.
This was realized with the TV-series “Prison Break” – and pretty well I might add.
Thus I have in retrospect unknowingly presented the basic idea, but naturally, I didn’t write the script, nor did I pick the actors, nor did I do anything else to realize this season [sic].
The same, i.e. presenting the basic structure, can I say about the series “Vikings”.
Here too I had the idea, that it would be interesting and exciting, to tell the story of the Vikings using Hollywood power. Starting from the first sea crossings to England, the pillaging over there, the way of life, the first moments of contact with a new religion – Christendom, the conquest of Paris. I still remember, that I mentioned, that it’s important in such an epic, you need to film as much in nature as possible, i.e. abstain as much as possible from using studio scenes.
I could present more examples, but I am sure that it’s obvious that this isn’t a coincidence anymore.
During the summer semester, when I talked in the apartment with the presumed eavesdroppers, I said among other things, that this situation that I’m being surveilled – I already hinted at, that I would defend myself against that – if necessary I would fly an airplane into a building to get the necessary attention – would go down in history and Hollywood movies would be made about me.
I would only become aware of how correct I was back then when I uttered those words much later.
Not only would movies be inspired by me after September 11th, 2001, but the Hollywood-connection already existed before that.
In hidden ways, i.e. in the movie format where people dealing with their own resp. the extraordinary powers they have access to and are unknown to the public, sometimes more and sometimes less correct.
Here a few examples:
“Look Who’s TalkingNow” – The viewers hear the thoughts of the children in this movie – in reality can these people read my resp. the thoughts of every person.
“The Cell” with Jennifer Lopez – This movie shows a woman, that has the special gift to jack into the brain of a person. Concretely she connects with the brain of a murderer to do some good, namely, save a missing woman from dying – in reality, this is only used with me or other people, without any concrete reasoning and to steal the entirety of one’s privacy.
“Starship Troopers” – This movie revolves around a not too far future, in which special military units have access to “telepathic powers” – this has already been the case for a long time.
There may be many other sequences from movies and series, which are however not known to me and therefore I can’t or have to list here.
In conclusion, I want to emphasize with these examples, that just this ability, “reading minds” and “jacking into the brain of other people”, is being processed through film by the same organization, that has access to this ability!
Chapter 7, Pages 19 lower half to 20 upper half (Linking into the brain / Scizo-Stuff)
Translated by @Woodchipper Chaperone
As I already mentioned, during the summer of 2001 I was talking to the secret service several times in my apartment. Amongst other things, I asked that I would be made aware of the newest clandestine methods.
They honored my wish, by illustrating the option of “jacking into the brain of someone else” through a dream.
In this “dream” I saw my father walk down the stairs of our house with a phone against his ear, while I was standing downstairs.
Shortly after I saw a “woman”, who also had a phone against her ear and spoke to me while facing in my direction “this can be even more awesome” …
Thus she pointed out to me, that she could influence my father talking to me and control the content and emotional state of my father.
Note: to prevent misunderstandings, with my current knowledge is the manipulation also possible without a physical telephone – the telephone is only to be seen as a metaphor.
Usually, I would explain this point more intensely since this drives the degree of surveillance to its extreme since even your own thoughts aren’t intimate anymore, thus the theft of your privacy is done at nearly 100%, and on the other hand, it describes the transition from passive surveillance into active intervention in one’s life and especially considering my efforts to bring this surveillance into the public eye is being made more difficult since the people I involved to help me were exposed to this manipulation.
However it remained with this one example, and on the other hand, it was as short as I explained it.
They honored my wish, by illustrating the option of “jacking into the brain of someone else” through a dream.
In this “dream” I saw my father walk down the stairs of our house with a phone against his ear, while I was standing downstairs.
Shortly after I saw a “woman”, who also had a phone against her ear and spoke to me while facing in my direction “this can be even more awesome” …
Thus she pointed out to me, that she could influence my father talking to me and control the content and emotional state of my father.
Note: to prevent misunderstandings, with my current knowledge is the manipulation also possible without a physical telephone – the telephone is only to be seen as a metaphor.
Usually, I would explain this point more intensely since this drives the degree of surveillance to its extreme since even your own thoughts aren’t intimate anymore, thus the theft of your privacy is done at nearly 100%, and on the other hand, it describes the transition from passive surveillance into active intervention in one’s life and especially considering my efforts to bring this surveillance into the public eye is being made more difficult since the people I involved to help me were exposed to this manipulation.
However it remained with this one example, and on the other hand, it was as short as I explained it.
The rest is still not translated. The other two PDFs (Football Tactics Babble and Afghanistan/Iraq Tactics babble) are still not translated as well.