Plagued Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ)

Ghostse

Gorilla Channel Executive Producer
kiwifarms.net
China, India, and Brazil generate the most emissions and the most environmental damage but are pretty much excempt from the Paris protocols.

Even assuming Climate Change is influenced by humans to levels the people who have been wrong about climate data say it is, anything done by the US and Europe is pointless as long as those countries are given a free pass to do whatever the fuck they want.

They also don't realize how much they hurt their case with anyone paying attention by screaming about apocalypse level events. And once something does pretty much happen and the world DOESN'T end, they can't haul them out because they were screaming this would end the world.

Remember Colony Collapse Disorder and the end of the honey bee? That was a lie.
CCD was/is a real problem. Its killing bees. But not to the level of threatening the species, and not even to the level of disrupting honey production. What it DOES disrupt is Honey Bees as a commercial pollinator: That is, parking hives near orchards and fields so the bees will pollenate the flowers for crops.
This is actually a huge deal! Without a scale pollinator, produce, especially fruit, would start becoming scarce and more expensive as it would likely not get pollinated at levels that will benefit. But there are other insects that are also viable commercial pollinators. Farmers can switch to them; they aren't as convenient as bees, but they'll do the job.
However, instead of saying "Hey, its really worrying that honey bees are dying off. Fruit is going to go up in price if we don't figure out what's going on." They scream and flail about the end of the world and how you are killing the planet if you don't spend quadruple to eat "organic".

Remember acid rain? That was a real, serious problem we "fixed" (by regulating business out of profitablity in the west so factories could open in china with zero environmental oversight). But it was never as bad as it was made out to be. And once stopped, it didn't fuck things up for decades after. Within a few years, like it didn't happen.

Remember the hole in the Ozone layer over antartica? How that fucker fixed itself almost immediately? Yeah well its coming back because the Chinese don't give a shit.
If you don't regulate China, you're just trying to drain the Nile with a tin cup.

And no one wants to address the real issue: Population. Urban sprawl, the explosion of 3rd world populations with western medicine and food production. Reduce the number of people, stop turning forest and farms into condos, and most of these problems go away.
 

Pokemonquistador2

Electric Boogaloo
kiwifarms.net
And no one wants to address the real issue: Population. Urban sprawl, the explosion of 3rd world populations with western medicine and food production. Reduce the number of people, stop turning forest and farms into condos, and most of these problems go away.

"B-b-b-b-but if we cast the immigrants out of our homelands and stop cramming food aid down their gullets, then who will nanny our children and mow our lawns for less than minimum wage?"

Maybe if "Climate Experts" wanted to convince the average Republican that they're not a bunch of grifters hoping to use Global Warming Hysteria to cudgel the US Middle Class into living in pods and eating grubs, they might , you know, NOT collect Hummer vehicles by the dozen or attend climate conferences in emissions-belching private jets. The first time a celebrity gives all of their money to the poor and goes to live in a clean but modest one bedroom apartment - that's the time I'll listen to and believe in their hysteria. Not a moment before.
 

Godzilla@1989

Your move, Chief.
kiwifarms.net
Let’s be honest, you should drop out of the race.
6B77F7DB-7AB1-468B-9BCD-DCDCD55A8005.jpeg


Having to put up with you complaining about your butt plug.
 

Scandinadian Bacon

Jim Webb 2020
kiwifarms.net
I was passing through the airport a short while ago and stopped to take a peek at the TV because CNN had a good one. Their chyron said something along the lines of "Putin asked Trump to release transcript of Helsinki conversation."

The story they laid out went on to discuss Putin telling Trump "a secret" which was that Russia will still meddle in the 2020 elections and that they would continue to troll the American public. CNN reported this with zero self-awareness whatsoever. They started their morning news cycle off with Putin allegedly saying he would be trolling the American public and decided to stake their claim on the hill of "Putin asked Trump to release transcript of Helsinki conversation."

Not only that, doesn't this also blow another hole in the Swiss cheese tapestry that is Trump being Putin's puppet? Is he or isn't he? And did any of this even happen at all? Or is Putin simply trolling CNN like they said he would in their own reporting?

Yes!!
 

heyitsmike

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
kiwifarms.net
So let's examine the ways Kamala would disregard or has disregarded the Bill of Rights.
1st amendment: Wants to use government power to force private companies to restrict freedom of speech on their behalf.
2nd amendment: Wants to unilaterally confiscate citizens' private arms.
3nd amendment: Not yet, but she wants her personal militia, MS-13 to be able live in your neighborhood, so not really that far off.
4th amendment: Wants to be able to forcibly enter your home to seize said private arms.
5th amendment: Violated defendants' due process by withholding exculpatory evidence while Prosecutor.
8th amendment: Supports bail system that adversely affects lower class citizens and kept those convicted in jail to use as cheap labor.
10th amendment: Wants to enact her authoritarianism at a federal level because she knows no states except the bluest ones would support her policies.
 

Wallace

Cram it in me, baby!
kiwifarms.net
So let's examine the ways Kamala would disregard or has disregarded the Bill of Rights.
1st amendment: Wants to use government power to force private companies to restrict freedom of speech on their behalf.
2nd amendment: Wants to unilaterally confiscate citizens' private arms.
3nd amendment: Not yet, but she wants her personal militia, MS-13 to be able live in your neighborhood, so not really that far off.
4th amendment: Wants to be able to forcibly enter your home to seize said private arms.
5th amendment: Violated defendants' due process by withholding exculpatory evidence while Prosecutor.
8th amendment: Supports bail system that adversely affects lower class citizens and kept those convicted in jail to use as cheap labor.
10th amendment: Wants to enact her authoritarianism at a federal level because she knows no states except the bluest ones would support her policies.

"But it's for your own good!"

Reminds me of 2003 when anyone criticizing the war in Iraq/Afghanistan would be accused of hating America or labeled a terrorist sympathizer.
 

It's HK-47

Meatbag's Bounty of Bodies
Local Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I have to wonder, honestly, what exactly is the purpose of all of this sudden, dialed-to-11 impeachment inquiry nonsense? They know it won't pass the Senate, and by going at it this hard it's all going to be completely stale by the time 2020 rolls around and nobody will want to hear about it. What would they have to gain by sending it to the Senate in the first place? What would drive the Democrats so insane that they'd attempt to drive Trump out before the primaries are even finished?

I can't help but notice that a certain story completely fell off the airwaves recently. Most of the time the really interesting stuff that you find doesn't come from what the MSM is saying, but from what they aren't saying. What would best complete this sentence: "A president who is up for reelection and is under an impeachment inquiry should not be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination.

She finished her last round of treatments at the end of August, and right about now is when a cancer patient would be heading back to receive a follow-up. You can call me crazy if you want, because it's just pure speculation and I have absolutely no evidence whatsoever to back it up, but I wonder if we'll be seeing the Democrats and the media start to repeat that line about how Trump shouldn't be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination sometime really soon here. If they do, then we know way more about Ginsberg's health than they're willing to tell us.
 

Flexo

Don't blame me. I voted for HK-47.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Oh geez the replies...
Screenshot_20191002-115506.jpg

View attachment 955829

I could seriously keep posting examples like these dating all the way back to the 1900s for hours. People really don't understand just how long this Climate Panic thing has been going on. There's a reason that I pay absolutely no attention to it anymore.

Heck, try it out for yourself: Go to Newspapers.com and search for things like "Global Cooling" and "Climate Change" and see just how far back this goes into the archives. It's actually a little frightening to watch these headlines dial back for way, way longer than you'd expect them to.
Handy checklist for you.
climate-doom-timeline.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Capsaicin Addict

Now see here you little shit.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I have to wonder, honestly, what exactly is the purpose of all of this sudden, dialed-to-11 impeachment inquiry nonsense? They know it won't pass the Senate, and by going at it this hard it's all going to be completely stale by the time 2020 rolls around and nobody will want to hear about it. What would they have to gain by sending it to the Senate in the first place? What would drive the Democrats so insane that they'd attempt to drive Trump out before the primaries are even finished?

I can't help but notice that a certain story completely fell off the airwaves recently. Most of the time the really interesting stuff that you find doesn't come from what the MSM is saying, but from what they aren't saying. What would best complete this sentence: "A president who is up for reelection and is under an impeachment inquiry should not be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination.

She finished her last round of treatments at the end of August, and right about now is when a cancer patient would be heading back to receive a follow-up. You can call me crazy if you want, because it's just pure speculation and I have absolutely no evidence whatsoever to back it up, but I wonder if we'll be seeing the Democrats and the media start to repeat that line about how Trump shouldn't be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination sometime really soon here. If they do, then we know way more about Ginsberg's health than they're willing to tell us.
If RBG has pancreatic cancer, her chances are slim at best. Cancer has killed people in FAR better shape and age than her (I still miss Patrick Swayze, damn it, and people still sink a drink to Stefan Karl Stefansson's memory).

The problem is that the Dems are walking a tightrope. If they actually push through an article of impeachment, it goes to the Senate -- and from the way Mitch is giggling and cracking his knuckles, I get the feeling the crazy cocaine-fueled fucker WANTS it there. Because Trump will be able to subpoena people under oath and force them to testify. So they DEFINITELY don't want it out in the Senate where the klieg lights will be turned on.

But if they don't push it through, their lunatic fringe will start acting up, and worse, Trump can make the case that their antics aren't really about impeachment but just a smear job. It's almost a lose-lose situation for them, unless Trump makes some unforced error (not impossible, but I don't see it happening).

Want some popcorn?
 

Memento Malum

The gods are dead and still we suffer
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I have to wonder, honestly, what exactly is the purpose of all of this sudden, dialed-to-11 impeachment inquiry nonsense? They know it won't pass the Senate, and by going at it this hard it's all going to be completely stale by the time 2020 rolls around and nobody will want to hear about it. What would they have to gain by sending it to the Senate in the first place? What would drive the Democrats so insane that they'd attempt to drive Trump out before the primaries are even finished?

I can't help but notice that a certain story completely fell off the airwaves recently. Most of the time the really interesting stuff that you find doesn't come from what the MSM is saying, but from what they aren't saying. What would best complete this sentence: "A president who is up for reelection and is under an impeachment inquiry should not be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination.

She finished her last round of treatments at the end of August, and right about now is when a cancer patient would be heading back to receive a follow-up. You can call me crazy if you want, because it's just pure speculation and I have absolutely no evidence whatsoever to back it up, but I wonder if we'll be seeing the Democrats and the media start to repeat that line about how Trump shouldn't be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination sometime really soon here. If they do, then we know way more about Ginsberg's health than they're willing to tell us.

The issue there is that the whole plan hinges on the Dems winning 2020, because otherwise they won't be able to postpone RBG's replacement for four years. And winning 2020 looks less and less likely when a feasible theory is that Hillary is going to make a comeback run, and she looks downright sane compared to some of the current frontrunners.
 

Polyboros2

Is dumb and lost Polyboros password
kiwifarms.net
I have to wonder, honestly, what exactly is the purpose of all of this sudden, dialed-to-11 impeachment inquiry nonsense? They know it won't pass the Senate, and by going at it this hard it's all going to be completely stale by the time 2020 rolls around and nobody will want to hear about it. What would they have to gain by sending it to the Senate in the first place? What would drive the Democrats so insane that they'd attempt to drive Trump out before the primaries are even finished?

I can't help but notice that a certain story completely fell off the airwaves recently. Most of the time the really interesting stuff that you find doesn't come from what the MSM is saying, but from what they aren't saying. What would best complete this sentence: "A president who is up for reelection and is under an impeachment inquiry should not be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination.

She finished her last round of treatments at the end of August, and right about now is when a cancer patient would be heading back to receive a follow-up. You can call me crazy if you want, because it's just pure speculation and I have absolutely no evidence whatsoever to back it up, but I wonder if we'll be seeing the Democrats and the media start to repeat that line about how Trump shouldn't be allowed to make a SCOTUS nomination sometime really soon here. If they do, then we know way more about Ginsberg's health than they're willing to tell us.

I've always suspected impeachment to come around now. If they did this at the start of the year when they got the House, it'd be over by the end of the year, Trump rolls into election season with a big win over the Democrats and their only talking point.

They start it now, get going into actually investigations early next year, they can campaign on him being a President facing impeachment, treat all their accusations as fact, maybe harass his campaigning with making him testify.
 

TowinKarz

I've been a wreck lately.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Many of the memes drip with insecurity too. They seem less like they're trying to be funny (they usually don't even seem to bother) and more like they're just trying to rub all the leftist viewers on the back and say "Remember that you are smart because you agree with me, and everyone who does not agree with me, I mean us, is super super dumb." They're not even mocking the other side so much as trying to reassure and validate their own.

Ever wonder why you never hear laughter at a modern "comedy" performance? Just applause?
 

Memento Malum

The gods are dead and still we suffer
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
96b7d3accbcf20f2a2d56d6551768f85.png


You know, I'm no expert but something about that chart you've got there seems a bit off.

If they're implying that the 2000 election was stolen by Dubya, why did they say that Trump won in 2016? I thought the narrative was that Trump stole that election via Russian bots and nefarious electoral colleges? Is there some subtle distinction between the two that escapes me, but is obvious to CNN?

(Also, I can just as easily say that he gets 4 right in a row, screws it up, then repeats the cycle. That appears to fit the data just as well.)
 

Similar threads

Manosphere shakaama
Schizophrenic black MGTOW with a weird voice
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • Locked
Make our sodium great again.
Replies
1
Views
4K
Top