starborn427614
kiwifarms.net
Love that flick.John Williams's best work is A.I.
Love that flick.John Williams's best work is A.I.
Congratulations. That is an actual unpopular opinion worthy of the thread. LOTR is about as good an adaptation of the books that could ever be made (in the absolute last time in history that they could have been made before the Age of Wokeness,) but if High Fantasy isn't your bag, they're probably not going to do anything for you.I'd never heard of the TV show until years after I'd seen the movie.
To me it was always a fun adventure movie.
My unpopular opinion was that I'd consider the Lord of The Rings movies the worst I've ever seen.
I got bored half an hour into the first one and 15 minutes into the sequels and stayed bored to the end. They felt five hours long and were as entertaining as staring at the wall.
I thought the Ralph Bakshi movie was good but not great.Congratulations. That is an actual unpopular opinion worthy of the thread. LOTR is about as good an adaptation of the books that could ever be made (in the absolute last time in history that they could have been made before the Age of Wokeness,) but if High Fantasy isn't your bag, they're probably not going to do anything for you.
Halloween has some decent direction, some genuine scares, and a really good performance by Donald Pleasance. It also embodies the mischevious, sinister spirit of Halloween and in that way, it's a cut above other slasher movies, which were all about lining up a bunch of dumb teenagers and mowing them down in creative, over the top ways.
I'll admit that I unironically enjoy Wild Wild West. Part of it might just be nostalgia since I saw it in the theaters when I was a little kid. But I also like it as just a fun popcorn flick.
Its an okay movie with some memorable visuals imo. Many complain about it not being enough like the original show, but as a fan of the original show myself, it actually did a decent job of continuing the whole scifi/supernatural theme that made the show unique for its time, what with it basically being the progenitor that popularized steampunk and fantasy westerns, elements which the show itself foolishly abandoned in its final season to be more like other generic westerns; so if anything was being unfaithful to the original show, it was the show itself what with drama between the creative heads behind the scenes.I feel like Wild Wild West was widely-derided upon initial release because it wasn't enough like either the TV show, which was before my time and I never caught it in reruns, or because it wasn't enough like Men in Black, but it's a movie some people have come to appreciate more in retrospect for at least being imaginative and weird. Maybe I think of it as an interesting failure, but "interesting failure" isn't necessarily a negative as it's better than being mediocre and forgettable.
The issue with all genre movies is that they are products of their own time. The reason why Star Wars resonated so much with people in the late 20th century is becauseHere’s a big one: the Star Wars movies don’t hold up if you’re watching them for the first time today, and people love them primarily because it’s what they grew up with (back in an era where they were groundbreaking and revolutionary) or because it’s what their parents grew up with and thus they saw it a bunch of times as a kid.
I saw the movies for the first time shortly after TFA came out (after it came to be known among my friends that I’d never actually watched Star Wars). In this friend group there was one girl who was an ardent fan of the series, some others who were positive/indifferent about it and another dude who like me hadn’t watched it before. After marathoning the OT, we were both decidedly unimpressed.
The old practical effects (combined with the dated Special Edition CGI) were just janky enough to pull me out of the experience, and the story wasn’t really anything special. It probably also didn’t help that Darth Vader being Luke’s father - which I’m sure was an absolutely epic twist at the time - has now become an anti-spoiler on par with Rosebud being the name of his sled.
Usually, with old movies/media, I think for them to stand the test of time they need to have at least one aspect where they go above and beyond. With Star Wars, I just thought everything was like... okay, maybe even good at times, but nothing really stood out. The only scene I remember genuinely being kinda excited during was the Death Star trench run. That’s still an excellent sequence that holds up today, but one scene isn’t gonna carry a trilogy of movies.
I definitely get why Star Wars is as popular as it is, but I think it’s a phenomenon with a definite expiration date because while it may have been the first to put the pieces together to make a samurai movie in space, nothing on its own was exceptionally outstanding, and the one genuinely great twist has been spoiled beyond belief by its own popularity.
Also gonna second the opinion that I also found LOTR to be a completely boring slog that went on for way too long. But I’m not big on high fantasy and never read the books, so it’s whatever.
Maybe make it Fergus argues for a bit with Jody trying to set him free when he's supposed to shoot him but his IRA handlers check up on him and he has to shoot Jody lest he be killed himself.... and THEN he'll be compelled to look after Jody's missus since he was directly responsible for his death and holds himself accountable for it instead of the wierd shit in the film.It has basically a meme status, but The crying game would be a true tearjerker and all time classic, as in one of the best films of all time, in my opinion, if Forrest Whitaker died differently and Dil didn't have a knob.
I always thought the plot must be a copy of an older film like the way the plot goesCloacaRimjob said:
It's almost as if god himself was punishing Jody fucking troons by knocking him down with a saxon at that precise point in time, what are the odds?
Now that's probably the reason why I was never able to get into the OG trilogy. I always tried chalking up as not caring for the sequels either, but there was always something that turned me off from the old ones, too. Guess I'm not much of a blockbusters fan.Here’s a big one: the Star Wars movies don’t hold up if you’re watching them for the first time today, and people love them primarily because it’s what they grew up with (back in an era where they were groundbreaking and revolutionary) or because it’s what their parents grew up with and thus they saw it a bunch of times as a kid.
I saw the movies for the first time shortly after TFA came out (after it came to be known among my friends that I’d never actually watched Star Wars). In this friend group there was one girl who was an ardent fan of the series, some others who were positive/indifferent about it and another dude who like me hadn’t watched it before. After marathoning the OT, we were both decidedly unimpressed.
The old practical effects (combined with the dated Special Edition CGI) were just janky enough to pull me out of the experience, and the story wasn’t really anything special. It probably also didn’t help that Darth Vader being Luke’s father - which I’m sure was an absolutely epic twist at the time - has now become an anti-spoiler on par with Rosebud being the name of his sled.
Usually, with old movies/media, I think for them to stand the test of time they need to have at least one aspect where they go above and beyond. With Star Wars, I just thought everything was like... okay, maybe even good at times, but nothing really stood out. The only scene I remember genuinely being kinda excited during was the Death Star trench run. That’s still an excellent sequence that holds up today, but one scene isn’t gonna carry a trilogy of movies.
I definitely get why Star Wars is as popular as it is, but I think it’s a phenomenon with a definite expiration date because while it may have been the first to put the pieces together to make a samurai movie in space, nothing on its own was exceptionally outstanding, and the one genuinely great twist has been spoiled beyond belief by its own popularity.
i'm sorry are you retardedRey isn't Mary Sue, at least no more than Luke or Anakin.
It's the unpopular opinion thread, let him have his say.i'm sorry are you retarded
Rey isn't Mary Sue, at least no more than Luke or Anakin.
Rey is definitely not a Mary Sue because Mary Sues are self-insert characters created by fans out of love. Rey is more like a feminist version of Poochie. The Last Jedi is 150+ minutes of Luke Skywalker driving towards the fireworks factory and never getting there because Rey is doing flips on a skateboard.i'm sorry are you retarded
Nah I think she's an ok character, and people just hate her because she's new and every new SW movie is treated as the worst thing ever until another one comes out.Rey is definitely not a Mary Sue because Mary Sues are self-insert characters created by fans out of love. Rey is more like a feminist version of Poochie. The Last Jedi is 150+ minutes of Luke Skywalker driving towards the fireworks factory and never getting there because Rey is doing flips on a skateboard.