US Instances of Voter Fraud (Megathread?) - Probably a good idea to have a thread on this given how often it's discussed and will continue to be discussed even after November.

Is mail in voting autistic?


  • Total voters
    92
  • Poll closed .

Shovel Mech Pilot

Backhoe Firestarter
kiwifarms.net

FunPosting101

Ebin posting only. No other posts allowed. :DDDD
kiwifarms.net
Analysis from Styx for and about the Arizona audit. He's pessimistic about the chances that they'll find anything because he believes the people who committed the fraud have successfully covered their tracks.

"Aurora Borealis!? At this time of year, at this time of day, in this part of the country, localized entirely within your kitchen!?"
"Yes."
"May I see it?"
"No."
This shit is why I think they might find something, even though Styx has a good chance of being right about this.
 
Last edited:

Super-Chevy454

kiwifarms.net
Analysis from Styx for and about the Arizona audit. He's pessimistic about the chances that they'll find anything because he believes the people who committed the fraud have successfully covered their tracks.


This shit is why I think they might find something, even though Styx has a good chance of being right about this.
Let's hope then the something isn't a nothingburger. Btw, there's a ineresting article on the subject. https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...na_election_audit_may_be_on_to_something.html ( https://archive.ph/x5ysR )
May 2, 2021

Media hysteria means Arizona election audit may be on to something​

By John D. O'Connor

While an uncertain public awaits results from the Arizona election audit, the immediate major media outcry, prematurely denouncing it, should be viewed as the audit's hitting a major media nerve. The media's reaction vividly demonstrates their fear of a searching re-examination of the election purity they have so arrogantly and unwaveringly proclaimed.
After all, if this election were as well run as touted (with the customary admission to the mere occasional and inevitable, but insignificant, error), then the Biden-centric media should be cheerleading the effort. Shouldn't the audit, to use a favored media word, be anticipated to "debunk" the claims of widespread irregularities?
The media have drawn great succor from numerous court cases turning down challenges to the 2020 election results. However, these claims raised issues not properly cognizable by our judicial system. Ordering a recount is one thing; relitigating a multimillion-vote election is quite another. It looks tremendously suspicious that, after Republican poll-watchers were banished, massive blocs of Detroit votes were introduced in the early morning, with 95% Biden selection. But what exactly is a smart person in black robes supposed to do with this tableau? Overturn the election without taking evidence? Convene a three-month trial with numerous witnesses and experts, while Biden and Trump cool their heels? A wise court should toss the case, as each reviewing jurist did. But this rejection should not be seen as validating the election process, as the major media did.
The election process itself, not the judicial system, is supposed to be administered so as to provide the public with confidence in the announced tallies. For this reason, the only widely recognized judicial remedy, as in Bush v. Gore, is an order to recount, which brings the process back to its proper venue: the election centers. So the unsuccessful Republican and Trump lawsuits to invalidate the various election results do not validate the propriety of election procedures; they merely demarcate the limited jurisdictional boundaries of our judicial system.
 

FunPosting101

Ebin posting only. No other posts allowed. :DDDD
kiwifarms.net
Lolcow styx who has been constantly wrong about the 2020 election, is.. still clinging to cope. Always a big conspiracy but the "baddies" are just too clever to be caught apparently. What bollocks. Obviously this is going to accomplish nothing, but don't say its because a conspiracy. That's not evidence of a coverup, that's schizophrenia.
 
Last edited:

Sekirodiealot

kiwifarms.net
Analysis from Styx for and about the Arizona audit. He's pessimistic about the chances that they'll find anything because he believes the people who committed the fraud have successfully covered their tracks.


This shit is why I think they might find something, even though Styx has a good chance of being right about this.
I can understand why he feels that way considering the Supreme Court kept dismissing them under the guise of "lack of standing".
If a rightie president wins and Supreme Court accepts liberal recounts after the election, they better not squirm of swarm of people, especially from centrist gets on their asses for double standards.
 
National File was unable to locate or obtain a response from the Arizona Republican Party, or the Arizona Senators responsible for the audit.

Hmm, they were talkin all of this good shit a few days ago. Then they all are quiet as church mice today.
 

Stoneheart

Well hung, and snow white tan
kiwifarms.net
The AZ audit has been skull-fucked, no more signature matching going forward.
They werent forced to talk about how much signatures they already matched and they can use already matched signatures.
they maybe already have enough missmatches and this is a giant PR bomb for the dems once the report drops
 

Super-Chevy454

kiwifarms.net
I saw this meme related to the audits and fraud that gived me some chuckles. https://www.americanthinker.com/cartoons/2021/05/5_1_2021_19_22.html


229134_5_.jpg
 
Top