Rogan and Harris are not right wing. And Peterson is arguably also not right wing either.
Yeah, but it's all part of the "discourse" which is code for being able to name drop as much as possible for the algorithm. Besides Vaushs show is just culture war puppet theatre. He always has to let his audiances live vicariously thru him as he "sticks it to the nahtseeess," so they can shell out the big bucks to get their superchat read out by their "esteemed" leader.
In his mind they are. Remember, grifter or not, Manbunpig is still a commie. Everyone not pushing for communism is a protofascist and will turn fascist after one bad day.
Rogan is only right wing on guns. But then again he has his professional Hunter buddy set up kills for him and Joe calls people a pussy for not hunting with a crossbow
And people claim that Prager U ads are more annoying. He manages to make me think that Dennis is more tolerable than him.
Okay so the guy who had his ass chewed out by Destiny and his fellow leftists for calling George W. Bush and Antonin Scalia fascists and not being able to define or defend those positions correctly. That guy is going to act like he's the esteemed expert on defining political ideas. Oh also Vaush doesn't read political literature, especially on ideas he doesn't like, and is open about that fact. Not saying you need to be a Political Science PhD to make videos explaining Political Ideologies and Ideas but still.
If you read the enemies ideas you might they are human and thus you will feel bad and not kill them. Is basically what Vaush believes
Does this moron know that history is filled with humans killing other humans and not caring?
I'm pretty decently knowledgeable on Leftism as a whole from Marxism-Leninism to Anarcho-Communism. All it did for me was make me hate leftists more due to how fucking delusional they are and how incompatible their ideas are with reality. In some cases they're so delusional that they acknowledge this but argue that they can change reality to suit their utopian retarded ideas. Like the Soviet Union and the concept of the "New Soviet Man". So nah me reading into the ideas of people I hate has only resulted in me hating them even more.
Well Vaush is a self-admitted brainlet when it comes to history. It was brought up in this thread prior but Vaush is open that he has a contempt for History since History isn't subjective and you can't just twist it to mean what you wish like Sociology. To be honest Vaush holds anything that requires you to live up to an ideal, isn't subjective or requires you to actually study into it. Like for example he holds open contempt towards theology and believes that if you believe in anything spiritual or religious then you have a mental illness and has mocked it on stream during debates to belittle his opponents because they believe in God or an Afterlife or what have you. Which makes sense on his end because if there is a creator and this isn't all randomness that came from nothing then that means that "Everything is Subjective!" is wrong and Vaush actually has to hold himself to something rather than being a giant hypocrite about everything living in endless hedonism with no discipline.
It's a lot harder to kill someone if you understand them screaming in pain. At that point, vilification and dehumanization is required for masses to commit atrocities.
I'm guessing Vaush has had more than a few harsh words against Religious Communism and Christian Anarchism.
Then you haven't visualized that far back. Killing another human being in the distant past didn't carry much moral weight behind it as it did later.
Yeah he did a whole debate on to a Christian Anarchist, mostly friendly but he repeating /r/atheism tier anti-God arguments. Which there are good arguments for Atheism (Which while good and thought provoking, I just can't accept the idea of Atheism since to me it just makes no fucking sense whenever I think long and hard about it) but Vaush's arguments are just shit you'd hear back in 2008 from dunning-kruger retards like Dawkins where it's a bad argument but worded to sound smart but it falls apart when you apply even basic critical thinking to it.
But Christianity doesn't allow you to be equal to god and all humans are equal to each other in Christianity so equality is perfectly compatible with Christianity and Christianity is likely the origin of equality as a concept.
Yeah but you can't be anti-hierarchy but at the same exact time believe that Jesus is the King of Kings and that you will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. In fact many Christian Theologians have made this point too. It's also why being a Leftist in Christian Denominations like Catholicism is punishable by excommunication. It's incompatible with the religion. Hence why most Leftists themselves are Atheists and are anti-Religion too.
I honestly don't see Dawkins as the intellectual authority of anything anymore (if he even was) since people have either moved on from him or he's made some "problematic" statements that have landed him heavy scrutiny.
"Okay so the guy who had his ass chewed out by Destiny and his fellow leftists for calling George W. Bush and Antonin Scalia fascists and not being able to define or defend those positions correctly. That guy is going to act like he's the esteemed expert on defining political ideas." Of course, what else do you expect from self-obsessed ideologues. " it's hard to define Fascism concretely and says it's vague and that Fascism is like a mental illness". It's exactly like what he did in the Count Dankula debate, describing White Supremacist so vaguely it could be applied to anyone who could be considered even slightly racist. Remember, you must broaden the scope of the accusation so you can use it to justify never listening to others, "why would you listen to him, he's a fascist". And besides, is Ur Fascism even a good source anyway?
