Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest

HonestJohn2376

kiwifarms.net
Vaush makes a point when he says empathy should be tempered by data. Vaush is correct when he says conservatives bemoan the decline of rural America and the struggles of the working-class people living there while condemning poor people in the cities as welfare leeches and criminals.

That being said, Vaush fails to mention how liberals are blinkered and callous but in reverse. They will write dissertations on poor people in the cities and shed tears watching Moonlight while writing off poor whites as hopeless bigots. Also, Vaush, the statement is, "Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them." It comes from David Hume, and it is not about empathy but how our instincts and feelings not only inform our reasoning but are the source thereof.

 
Last edited:

Lensherr

kiwifarms.net
Vaush comes out as a white nationalist.
View attachment 1435260
View attachment 1435259

The Striker/Allsup debate was pathetic tbh, I turned it off after like 20-30 minutes. It was a predictable shitshow, both destiny and vaush have very fallacious debate tactics (same with striker tbh, dunno about allsup).

As a devout socialist, Vaush supports worker's rights. Or he doesn't, depending on the situation:
View attachment 1435263
“Sure, extending First Amendment protections to the workplace would grant employees more of a voice and allow them to more effectively organize and fight for their interests, but a Wendy’s cashier might say the n-word, so it’s a bad idea.”

I’m not a leftist, but it honestly pisses me off seeing leftists act like strategic libertarians and defend corporations when it comes to issues of freedom of speech and whenever the question of how to deal with racism comes up. Vaush and people like him in a lot of ways are neoliberals in socialist/leftist clothing: they talk a big game about how evil corporations are, but at the end of the day they’ll side with woke capital if it means suppressing voices that they don’t like. There are leftists who argue that intersectionalism/idpol is a means of dividing the working class and preventing any significant systemic change, and I’m inclined to agree with that sentiment. Vaush especially has a habit of running apologetics for big tech firms like Google and FaceBook suppressing right-wing voices.
Seems the whole Nick Cannon situation was too much for Horsecock Andy. Now he suddenly starts wondering if BLM maybe pushes anti-white rhetoric? Not that it was obvious to anyone that is not licking nikeys.
Well, at least he’s somewhat consistent when it comes to racialism/identity politics (or at least more so that most leftists).
Vaush unironically thinks children's cartoons are real-life and not fiction. Also, why is Vaush hiding Nazi dogwhistles in his tweet URLs?
View attachment 1454881
I’m getting major MovieBob vibes from this tweet.
Nazis have become an American fetish to a disturbing degree, our media is basically so saturated with heroes fighting Nazis that it has gone beyond just being a contemporary trend and has become part of our collective psyche. They are our number one villain and when people want to demonstrate their edge or their rejection of contemporary society, they often use Nazi imagery to do so. The actualities and particulars of German National Socialism get lost in all the shallow pulp of Indiana Jones or the rather explicit revenge porn of Inglourious Basterds.

You’d think with the intellectual pretensions guys like Vaush and Destiny go out of their way to display, this state of affairs would concern them. Yet like every good class conscious capitalist out there, they found a way to make money off of it.
People like Vaush and Destiny who constantly sperg about Nazis are the modern-day equivalent of a 17th century New England Puritan who would go around and decry everything that they find objectionable as witchcraft or heresy.
 

BadTakeCrucifier

They should have never gave you niggas Twitter
kiwifarms.net
I’m not a leftist, but it honestly pisses me off seeing leftists act like strategic libertarians and defend corporations when it comes to issues of freedom of speech and whenever the question of how to deal with racism comes up. Vaush and people like him in a lot of ways are neoliberals in socialist/leftist clothing: they talk a big game about how evil corporations are, but at the end of the day they’ll side with woke capital if it means suppressing voices that they don’t like.
Private companies can do whatever they want, but never with the Means Of Production! (tm)

A lot of people have been catching on to this exact hypocrisy. Amazing how even the most hardcore, militant communists will temporarily transform into libertarians, and bloviate about the rights of private businesses whenever a company censors someone that leftists/breadtube do not like.

At the end of the day, it's obvious they don't care about rights, just censorship. They seem quite good at saying whatever shit is the most manipulative, at times. Stems from a real creepy need to control the conversations people have. Also, they will cry oppression whenever someone on the left actually gets punished for being an ass. Which is deeply ironic considering 1. How much leniency the left gets from social media and the mainstream news at all times, and 2. The left pretty much owns and operates cancel culture.

Imagine how fast you'd hear about it, if that shit Vaush says about "legalizing and not punishing child porn," came from some right wing sperg.
 

The Lawgiver

We all know what happens to alien spies.
kiwifarms.net
Private companies can do whatever they want, but never with the Means Of Production! (tm)

A lot of people have been catching on to this exact hypocrisy. Amazing how even the most hardcore, militant communists will temporarily transform into libertarians, and bloviate about the rights of private businesses whenever a company censors someone that leftists/breadtube do not like.

At the end of the day, it's obvious they don't care about rights, just censorship. They seem quite good at saying whatever shit is the most manipulative, at times. Stems from a real creepy need to control the conversations people have. Also, they will cry oppression whenever someone on the left actually gets punished for being an ass. Which is deeply ironic considering 1. How much leniency the left gets from social media and the mainstream news at all times, and 2. The left pretty much owns and operates cancel culture.

Imagine how fast you'd hear about it, if that shit Vaush says about "legalizing and not punishing child porn," came from some right wing sperg.
Yeah, it's absolutely a control thing. This kind of behavior amongst political types online always stems from a lust for keeping anyone but those in their circle of social clout chasers down. The autism stuff is another factor of this thats really irritating as well.
Vaush using autism as a shield is literally the kind of criticism deflection shit people made fun of years ago, and yet now nearly everyone like this pulls the fucking autism card and it somehow works now. Autism, specifically high functioning autism, is not a fucking excuse. Not getting a joke isn't fucking "autism" because jokes have structure, and autists tend to generally pick up on shit with a structure. having a tendency to fuck up with Social cues and accurately reading people is what high functioning autism is. That shit can be minimized with years of therapy and counseling, but it never fully goes away.
Now that high functioning autism and it's ever so slightly different spinoff aspergers are now lumped into just "autism" with the invalid constantly screaming people literally incapable of developing an understanding of human society, they have a free open door to fully exploit the system acting like they don't know any better when they clearly fucking do. It's how you get shit like random camwhores "stimming" as covered in other threads, it's how you get guys like Vaush using it to get his fans to circle him in defense. I fucking hate this misinformation game with autism so much and it shows no signs of stopping. Coddling high functioning autists for being "autistic" only makes them into little egotistic pricks that game the system just as much as the people that fake having it for internet points and control over others do since they're pretty much near indistinguishable from non-autists.
Sorry if this came off too rambly I'm barely fucking awake right now.
 

Soynificent

Yeah..I miss you.
kiwifarms.net
The unemployed streamer who relies on donations to support him talking about communism, is telling a multi-company owning billionaire he doesn't know how the world works. Vaush could not be farther from self awareness. Vaush and other leftcows are going apeshit over this tweet, too.
View attachment 1478663https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1287824348460593154 http://archive.vn/jlJSi http://archive.vn/jlJSi


Also, bold move for pedo-ish Vaush to talk shit about Elon and Grime's relationship drama, when his own girlfriend is a gorilla pigbeast who says being thin is unhealthy.
View attachment 1478667View attachment 1478668
"2/3rds of the country supports BLM"

But BLM doesn't translate into your politics for most people, Hambeast. Most people just want police to stop abusing thier power, even a lot of the ACAB ppl have a very surface view of the situation. Vaush will find come election time that his politics are still unpopular. The riots aren't hurting Trump either, but helping him.
 

Rekkington

Obama chuckled. "You mean the chaos emeralds?"
kiwifarms.net
Private companies can do whatever they want, but never with the Means Of Production! (tm)

A lot of people have been catching on to this exact hypocrisy. Amazing how even the most hardcore, militant communists will temporarily transform into libertarians, and bloviate about the rights of private businesses whenever a company censors someone that leftists/breadtube do not like.

At the end of the day, it's obvious they don't care about rights, just censorship. They seem quite good at saying whatever shit is the most manipulative, at times. Stems from a real creepy need to control the conversations people have. Also, they will cry oppression whenever someone on the left actually gets punished for being an ass. Which is deeply ironic considering 1. How much leniency the left gets from social media and the mainstream news at all times, and 2. The left pretty much owns and operates cancel culture.

Imagine how fast you'd hear about it, if that shit Vaush says about "legalizing and not punishing child porn," came from some right wing sperg.
He would have a lot to say about the McCarthy investigations, despite the fact that most of the people - including Dalton Trumbo - were actually card-carrying Communists and just thought that should be allowed while the nation was at war with Communists. Flash forward to now and you get your bank account blackballed for saying black people shouldn't be allowed to openly threaten and kill white people, and well gosh you know things are just so complicated all of a sudden.
 

HonestJohn2376

kiwifarms.net
“Sure, extending First Amendment protections to the workplace would grant employees more of a voice and allow them to more effectively organize and fight for their interests, but a Wendy’s cashier might say the n-word, so it’s a bad idea.”

I’m not a leftist, but it honestly pisses me off seeing leftists act like strategic libertarians and defend corporations when it comes to issues of freedom of speech and whenever the question of how to deal with racism comes up. Vaush and people like him in a lot of ways are neoliberals in socialist/leftist clothing: they talk a big game about how evil corporations are, but at the end of the day they’ll side with woke capital if it means suppressing voices that they don’t like. There are leftists who argue that intersectionalism/idpol is a means of dividing the working class and preventing any significant systemic change, and I’m inclined to agree with that sentiment. Vaush especially has a habit of running apologetics for big tech firms like Google and FaceBook suppressing right-wing voices.
Ironic, since it's the opposite of what old-school leftists fought for. Case in point, Chomsky followed his principles by famously defending the free speech of a Holocaust denier, which pissed off many liberals and wokescold leftists. Orwell disliked queers, feminists, and "sandal-wearers" because they divided the left by prioritized their pet issues over creating a united working class.

Assuming the issue was a zero-sum game, I imagine working people having a voice and strong solidarity is relatively more important than stopping Karen from saying "nigger" while at work. Getting pissed at workers for not being woke is hilarious. By nature of their background, they aren't enlightened from a liberal arts education. So of course you're going to have some Karens and Shanequas peck each other.
 
“Sure, extending First Amendment protections to the workplace would grant employees more of a voice and allow them to more effectively organize and fight for their interests, but a Wendy’s cashier might say the n-word, so it’s a bad idea.”
In the same breath they'll say "Just because a few businesses get destroyed every time there's a protest doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the movement". I'd rather get called a name than have a business I frequent or spent years building get destroyed in the crossfire of a Commie larping session and threatened with further retaliation if I were to dare speak out about it.

Recently I thought about the "Unite the Right" rally, one of the last "right-wing" rallys that ended with violence. At that rally, the rally-goers were outnumbered at least 2-1 by protestors, and the police would cut off groups of rally-goers from the rest, leaving isolated groups of rally-goers in an ocean of dissenters. This was before the local government decided to rescind the permit during the rally, turning it into a protest, which meant the rally-goers lost what little police protection they had.

When talked about, it's commonly believed (and you're not allowed to question it) that it was the rally-goers who turned it into the riot themselves. Every injury and death was squarely on their hands, and those who participated in it need to be named and shamed.

By their logic, whichever group takes ownership of the demonstration should be responsible for the what it turns into. If that's how they want to see it, fair enough.

Fast forward to today. Most of these protests, (rallys have to be approved by the city they're held in) end up becoming riots. Even before it's declared a riot, businesses get trashed.

At best we might get a condemnation of rioting, but whoever condemns it is careful to justify the protests that lead to the riots and minimize the damages from the rioting. "Property can be replaced, but the 10,000 black people killed daily by white police officers cannot be".

At its worst, we're told it's the police/Feds that start riots and that the righteous protestors hands were forced. Your business HAD to be looted, for equality. If you dissent, you're a bootlicker.

If a protest never turns into a riot, it's posted all over Reddit as a symbol of every protest from this movement "See, we never start riots", "WE 👏 ARE 👏 WINNING 👏".

From what I've seen, leftists and bread tubers are larpers and hypocrites. They're the fat kid who always has the invisible invincibility cloak on.

They advocate for "liberation", while controlling others, and justifying that control as a good thing.
 

Goku 1000000 O

d91550
kiwifarms.net
Vaush makes a point when he says empathy should be tempered by data. Vaush is correct when he says conservatives bemoan the decline of rural America and the struggles of the working-class people living there while condemning poor people in the cities as welfare leeches and criminals.
He’s engaging in subtle race baiting. The claim that Cons just call city people leeches and criminals is a reference to stereotypes of Black people.

You could just as well read this as him saying, “Conservatives care about the poor rural Whites, but hate poor Blacks.”
 

HonestJohn2376

kiwifarms.net
He’s engaging in subtle race baiting. The claim that Cons just call city people leeches and criminals is a reference to stereotypes of Black people.

You could just as well read this as him saying, “Conservatives care about the poor rural Whites, but hate poor Blacks.”
That's exactly what I was saying. Conservatives only care about "their people", the poor rural whites. Liberals do the same but for their side. Vaush, true to form, or lack thereof, only mentions conservatives.

From what I've seen, leftists and bread tubers are larpers and hypocrites. They're the fat kid who always has the invisible invincibility cloak on.

They advocate for "liberation", while controlling others, and justifying that control as a good thing.
That's what doing politics is about, fighting for your side. If that means dishonesty and hypocrisy, so be it. Even the most conscientious person who advocates for a group, movement, or ideology will inevitably slant the truth, at least a little bit and unconsciously, to support his cause.* Internet pundits are too stupid and unscrupulous to be subtle about it.

*If you want to go into philosophy, humans filter the chaos of information around them to create narratives. That inevitably means excluding a lot of information and only picking facts that can make sense in a narrative. Most of this is unconscious and even necessary to everyday life. Hypocrisy in politics is a dirtbag version of this function.
 

Rekkington

Obama chuckled. "You mean the chaos emeralds?"
kiwifarms.net
Oh so now unfiltered and unbiased reporting is "indiscriminate." I know this is a bit of a cold take, but for people so concerned about twisting dialectic they are clearly trying to push the "discrimination = good now" thing. Unsurprising since that's the entirety of the whole equity thing, but what's important is it can be rearranged and shifted on the fly since there is no actual goal and the past doesn't matter.

In Return of the Strong Gods by RR Reno, he makes a good point that the alignment of Neoliberalism with Leftism works because both endeavor to only propose self-criticism and deconstruction as the guiding principles (with slightly different agendas) and that the goals are always very ill defined. It's "do better" and "growth." This is how they can propose revolution without a true end point, and how they can disregard the past as always irrelevant compared to the present (part of a larger attack on all forms of tradition.)

I absolutely fucking love the about-face they've all done on police bodycams. We started seeing this where I live last year, but they're actively campaigning to remove bodycams since all the available footage exonerates officers and makes both black people and women look like hysterical nutjobs. The narrative of police being secretly corrupt has been completely blown out of the fucking water and as always they've just regressed to "facts don't matter as much as intentions." Data is now a non issue, you're just a Nazi for noticing statistics. That's literally their play right now.
 

justsignmeupfam

kiwifarms.net
re: Vaush claiming he is autistic.

Didn't he only start saying this for the first time after he got caught sexually harassing autistic girls in Destiny's discord? He has a long online history that seems pretty empty of any claims of autism... then suddenly he gets caught harassing autistic girls on discord and starts claiming he's also autistic so it's okay? It worked, so now he uses it as a cop-out for everything. Classic.
 

Lensherr

kiwifarms.net
To piggyback off of my last post, Vaush admitted in a stream with TJ Kirk that corporations are useful to leftists because of the progressive policies that they push, such as more lenient immigration laws (gotta have that cheap labor), and that when right-wingers criticize corporations, they’re only doing it because they’re fascists who don’t like said progressive policies.


Go to the 2:22:35 mark to see what I’m talking about.
 

HonestJohn2376

kiwifarms.net
In Return of the Strong Gods by RR Reno, he makes a good point that the alignment of Neoliberalism with Leftism works because both endeavor to only propose self-criticism and deconstruction as the guiding principles (with slightly different agendas) and that the goals are always very ill defined. It's "do better" and "growth." This is how they can propose revolution without a true end point, and how they can disregard the past as always irrelevant compared to the present (part of a larger attack on all forms of tradition.)
In an ancient, pre-transition video, Natalie/Contrapoints describes how critique is important but cannot be positive or creative. She asks a rhetorical question, something like this: "Is this all critique can really do? Discover the bars and walls of your prison?" Well, yes. The critical faculty causes dissolution by nature. It is in the leftist term "deconstruction". Critique can tell you what's wrong, which is invaluable, but it cannot give solutions by itself. It cannot get you out of prison.

That is why so many leftists intellectuals are depressed and nihilistic. They became hypercritical about everything but neglected to develop a creative faculty to balance out the critical faculty. Why? Because they aren't interested in creativity. They are interested in destroying enemies they see as oppressors.

Harry Brewis is the only BreadTuber I know who genuinely cares about creativity, what makes a work meaningful, how a work succeeds or fails in putting all its elements together into an organic whole. Other reviewers, like Lindsay Ellis and Leon Thomas, merely critique movies to promote leftist politics.

Critique is not enough. It never was.

To piggyback off of my last post, Vaush admitted in a stream with TJ Kirk that corporations are useful to leftists because of the progressive policies that they push, such as more lenient immigration laws (gotta have that cheap labor), and that when right-wingers criticize corporations, they’re only doing it because they’re fascists who don’t like said progressive policies.
This is actually sensible. Using other parties, even enemies, to promote your message and strengthen your position is a smart move though hypocritical as fuck. Once radical groups among the lower classes climbed up the social latter and became more mainstream, becoming watered down and hollow as the inevitable price that must be paid.
 
Last edited:

BadTakeCrucifier

They should have never gave you niggas Twitter
kiwifarms.net
what's important is it can be rearranged and shifted on the fly since there is no actual goal and the past doesn't matter.

In Return of the Strong Gods by RR Reno, he makes a good point that the alignment of Neoliberalism with Leftism works because both endeavor to only propose self-criticism and deconstruction as the guiding principles (with slightly different agendas) and that the goals are always very ill defined. (...)
Agreed. The left changes the rules and makes shit up as they go along, all depending on what makes them look good at the time. Their values don't exist, there is no unified theory to their philosophy, it's literally just "I hate this thing that's making me look bad!"

They don't like playing fair. Being held to standards means they actually get caught. Left will support for something (like bodycams) to be a universal standard one year, and then the next year when it happens to not benefit them, suddenly it's bad. I swear the left does this with everything.
Critique is not enough. It never was.
When your whole movement is based on bitching and complaining about the people who do all the work in society for you, it's no wonder that it's destructive. Critics who lack the ability to create anything are inherently parasitic human beings.
 

Rekkington

Obama chuckled. "You mean the chaos emeralds?"
kiwifarms.net
In an ancient, pre-transition video, Natalie/Contrapoints describes how critique is important but cannot be positive or creative. She asks a rhetorical question, something like this: "Is this all critique can really do? Discover the bars and walls of your prison?" Well, yes. The critical faculty causes dissolution by nature. It is in the leftist term "deconstruction". Critique can tell you what's wrong, which is invaluable, but it cannot give solutions by itself. It cannot get you out of prison.

That is why so many leftists intellectuals are depressed and nihilistic. They became hypercritical about everything but neglected to develop a creative faculty to balance out the critical faculty. Why? Because they aren't interested in creativity. They are interested in destroying enemies they see as oppressors.

Harry Brewis is the only BreadTuber I know who genuinely cares about creativity, what makes a work meaningful, how a work succeeds or fails in putting all its elements together into an organic whole. Other reviewers, like Lindsay Ellis and Leon Thomas, merely critique movies to promote leftist politics.

Critique is not enough. It never was.
It's funny how easy this all is to pin down, Derrida is said to be the first one to try and inject some vigor into the entire thing by proposing deconstruction can be a sort-of exciting grand adventure. There's some seminal works that lay out the case for this sort of extreme critique and deconstruction - all of it in the interest of figuring out what happened in WW2 and how to avoid it again, laying it at the feet at nationalism and tradition - but most of the authors (like Karl Popper who did Open Society and Its Enemies) always ran up against that problem. They kept noticing people ended up moorless and dejected but thought that was largely unimportant due to the emotional fears of WW2. But you can't get away with that now, which is why people like Vaush keep returning to the Nazi well and acting like if we don't go down this path we're all on fire. All they can bring to the table otherwise is a bouquet of degeneracies that are still unpalatable to the general public.

But the thing is, they can never move beyond this, and that's by design. The very core of their ideology requires them to be anti-traditional and anti-nationalist and they will always run up against the irony of needing both of those things to make anything people want to be a part of so it will always rely on fear. They claim that nationalism/traditionalism cannot exist without "the other" but it's really them. They will always need the specter of Nazism right around the corner because their entire proposal is incredibly gay, annoying, depressing, and self-destructive on its own.
 
Tags
None