It's not really possible to do that since Richard typically only debates people he can beat, i.e. Frank Tufano and when he is presented with something he can't answer, he'll come up with a gem like "that's just not in the scope of the conversation", which his inexperienced opponents always seem to let slide. There is another YouTuber named Bart Kay that challenged Richard to a debate a year or two ago, and Richard agreed to this debate, thinking it would be another walk in the park. Funnily enough, after agreeing to the debate, he did a bit of background research of this "Bart Kay" and realized Bart was a published researcher (you know - someone with an actual education who knows how to read and interpret scientific research - not someone like Richard who can only parrot a couple lines from a conclusion or abstract) who was going to make him look like a fool. Richard unsurprisingly went silent for a few weeks, until he found an excuse his audience was stupid enough to believe, to get out of the debate. He made up a lie about Bart being a "doxxer" or something (lul), and as an upstanding member of society (lul) he just couldn't possibly lower himself to debate someone of such low moral character. Richard is a grifter who is has even sunk as low as to start pimping out his wife. He's a pathetic excuse for a human being and only a complete moron could actually watch this guy unironically and not see what a morally bankrupt, talentless, loser he is. The only reason he is vegan is because he thinks it gives him the moral high ground, from which he can ridicule others to make him feel better about his sorry excuse for a life.