Boobie Bomb
kiwifarms.net
No new news I'm guessing?
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
- Thread starter 5t3n0g0ph3r
- Start date
-
Sister services, email, and search will continue to be negatively effected by the attacks. I made a thread to talk about it, if you're into networking.
Nick's been playing a very long con, making Vic Lasagna the only VA I've cared about beyond the acknowledgment that they exist since I was nine.
But I can believe he did it all for the nose candy. Just look at his nose-- you can't tell me he's not just inhaling all the cocaine in a five mile radius.
Appeal judgements comes out thursdays evening. Check back every friday mornings USA time to know if anything new came out.
This is gonna be the week.
Source: dude trust me
Source: dude trust me
No, we get it end of june.
Source: my uncle works at
Nick brought up a point: June 22nd is the 9 month soft deadline for Vic's appeal.
I'm assuming Vic got everything filed well in advance already, but I'm expecting the worst-case scenario and for the courts to find some kind of excuse to uphold all of Chupp's decisions.
Honestly, as long as they write a good opinion it'll be whatever for me.
Assuming worst timeline, at least, somewhere down the road, the next poor schmuck who gets metoo'd has a better roadmap
Laundui_or_douchette?
kiwifarms.net
Expect nothing, and we shall receive it in abundance.
But...I PAID my source. Admittedly in 3 dollar gas station wine but still more then your source. And according to Washington Post rules, that makes my source a PROFESSIONAL source. Because he got paid.
So there.
Terrifik
kiwifarms.net
What rule is this based off of?
Shouldn't covid push back the time line bit also due to act of god claus?
It's the court's own rule so they can ignore it if they want.
DumDum Did Nothing Wrong
kiwifarms.net
Well I beat Pathfinder last week so this is gonna be the week.....of finding a new rpg to play while I wait for the COA to put the final nail in.
Hoping Half Life 3 drops before the decision does.
It's not a rule. He's just claiming, with or without evidence, I don't know, that it is the general practice of the court to do it that way, just like it is the general practice of the court to release substantive rulings on Thursday. They (2D) do release rulings at other times, but most of the time, they are rulings on writs or motions.
I have no basis to agree or disagree with Nick's opinion, although I think he probably pays more attention to this case than I do.
The 9 month thing may come from the internal operating procedures for the second court of appeals, which lists the expected timeframe for opinions on page 8. Opinion author is assigned approximately 21 days before submission, and should have a draft opinion available to the panel approximately 6 months after submission. The other panel members then have 14 days to sign off on the draft or announce they will write a concurrence or dissent and 60 days after to present their own draft. Future drafts have an unspecified additional amount of time for completion. This doesn't appear to actually be "soft deadline of 9 months from submission to opinion", although if it's being followed first drafts should already exist for whatever will ultimately be issued. I don't see any other official time frame given anywhere, other than 180 days for cases related to child protection. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure just states "The court of appeals should render its judgment promptly after submission of a case."
Terrifik
kiwifarms.net
so nick has a stream with vic planned for the 24th...
And as you know, if you've ever closely followed an appellate case, you understand that "promptly" has all kinds of meanings, not all of which you might like.
Similar threads
