I'm sure this has been asked around here before, and thousands of farmers have tilled the soil and harvested oodles of spergs, but has this bullshit movement and ideology ever been legitimately for gender equality?
Was feminism always about "equality"? - The genealogy of the Karen-sapien
- Thread starter Tardar the Barbarian
- Start date
-
Intermittent Denial of Service attack is causing downtime. Looks like a kiddie 5 min rental. Looking into some solutions.
Cheerlead-in-Chief
kiwifarms.net
Before (First Wave Feminism), yes.
Afterwards, no. (I'm not so sure about Second Wave Feminism)
Edit: Mary Shelley's mom was a feminist and went crazy over a guy and her husband published it out of revenge.
Afterwards, no. (I'm not so sure about Second Wave Feminism)
Edit: Mary Shelley's mom was a feminist and went crazy over a guy and her husband published it out of revenge.
Last edited:
StarkRavingMad
kiwifarms.net
It was never about equality.
Even during its first wave, when the fight was about the right to vote, the white women threw their black brothers under the bus.
Feminists will always silence and step on other people to get what they want while crying out how virtuous they are.
Even during its first wave, when the fight was about the right to vote, the white women threw their black brothers under the bus.
Feminists will always silence and step on other people to get what they want while crying out how virtuous they are.
LurkNoMore
kiwifarms.net
It never has been never will be. Not even first wave feminists argued for a draft of women (at least in the US) or some sort of national service for women to go along with the male draft.
Any point or issue bares this out.
Any point or issue bares this out.
- Highlight
- #6
It never was.
The first wave was full of the same white feathering cunts shaming men to go throw their lives away and die in the meat grinder of WW1.
And nothing stopped them from completely shitting on the few who actually physically made it back.
Fentanyl Floyd
kiwifarms.net
Feminism was about putting niggers and trannies in our vidya gaymes. Don't you remember gamergate?
I also read that feminists had ties to the Ku Klux Clan because, of course, a lot of them were wives to klansmen.
Harlan Wick
kiwifarms.net
First wave (Right to vote) was solely for the purpose to have the ability to vote. Nothing about equality, hell some were willing to shaft black people simply so they got the vote.
Second wave (Angry, Self Righteous Cunt era) the only equality being sought was pay and job opportunity by being given it. This is the era that started inter-sectionalism, radical feminism, only lesbians could be true feminists, porn only existed to harm women, and the slow march to infiltrating entertainment to push the agenda.
Third wave (Thanks George Orwell for the how to guide) the equality they profess is just the sugar to make the bullshit go down. It is also the point of contention between the useful idiots and the radicals. Resulting in TERF's (they hate trans) and SWERF's (they really hate anyone in the sex industry) being unwelcome among the brain fuckwits that have latched on to Feminism as a means of career advancement or to get a date.
Second wave (Angry, Self Righteous Cunt era) the only equality being sought was pay and job opportunity by being given it. This is the era that started inter-sectionalism, radical feminism, only lesbians could be true feminists, porn only existed to harm women, and the slow march to infiltrating entertainment to push the agenda.
Third wave (Thanks George Orwell for the how to guide) the equality they profess is just the sugar to make the bullshit go down. It is also the point of contention between the useful idiots and the radicals. Resulting in TERF's (they hate trans) and SWERF's (they really hate anyone in the sex industry) being unwelcome among the brain fuckwits that have latched on to Feminism as a means of career advancement or to get a date.
Last edited:
If it really is about equality, then why not call it an equality movement instead?
Calling it "feminism" played right into the woke idea of holding everyone of a group deemed "oppressor" responsible for the actions of some of the kind. Now "cis" men are demonized in woke mainstream media.
Calling it "feminism" played right into the woke idea of holding everyone of a group deemed "oppressor" responsible for the actions of some of the kind. Now "cis" men are demonized in woke mainstream media.
There does not exist an Id-pol group that doesn't inherently seek supremacy.
Blacks, whites, men, women, w/e.
Every single one would set themselves as above all others given the opportunity.
Every single one actively pursues this.
Best if people just stopped.
Blacks, whites, men, women, w/e.
Every single one would set themselves as above all others given the opportunity.
Every single one actively pursues this.
Best if people just stopped.
The unfortunate problem with any civil rights movement is that once they accomplish the reasonable goal they set out to do, all the reasonable people all become satisfied and all go home, leaving behind the crazies to goal-post shift over increasingly banal issues. This is why feminism and other SJW movements are hyper-focused on "micro-aggressions" like "manspreading," or "mansplaining," then cry "bigot" when everyone calls them a dumbass for getting worked up over nothing.
All the reasonable goals have been met by now, so they're desperately clinging to the underdog status to try to become the next Susan B. Anthony or Marlin Luther King Jr.
All the reasonable goals have been met by now, so they're desperately clinging to the underdog status to try to become the next Susan B. Anthony or Marlin Luther King Jr.
The push for equal societal roles has lead to the collapse of birthrates. Feminism is inherently genocidal and Gates like population control types usually want to push Feminism for low IQ countries. An enormous genetic diversity has been lost due to feminism. Some could even say that intellectual curiosity is bred out of people by educating women. Highly educated women of course don't pass on their genes efficiently enough, to have their traits persist in the society.
After allowing education of girls.
After allowing education of girls.
YachieKicchou
kiwifarms.net
I can't comment about gender equality but in terms of equality in general: feminist women were some of the most outspoken voices on the needs for eugenics. Make of that what you will.
My most succinct guide:
First wave: women is equal to men in every way, and it's up to society to recognize the fact.
Second wave: women are inferior to men because of their biology; the goal was to Fix Society Please so that women are no longer inferior to men despite their biology. Also Marxism. Gave us radfems, "political lesbianism", and menstrual art.
Third wave: women are superior to man because whatever. Men are denigrated as oppressors. Also postmodernism, intersectionality and (of late) rampant consumerism. Gave us troons.
First wave: women is equal to men in every way, and it's up to society to recognize the fact.
Second wave: women are inferior to men because of their biology; the goal was to Fix Society Please so that women are no longer inferior to men despite their biology. Also Marxism. Gave us radfems, "political lesbianism", and menstrual art.
Third wave: women are superior to man because whatever. Men are denigrated as oppressors. Also postmodernism, intersectionality and (of late) rampant consumerism. Gave us troons.
User names must be unique
kiwifarms.net
No, The first wave fighting for women's right to vote in the UK entirely ignored millions of white men that couldn't vote because at the time they had to own land to be allowed to vote.
Feminism was just a hobby for wealthy bored housewives, widows and spinsters. who didn't even particularly care about poor women the wives of the men without votes.
Feminism was just a hobby for wealthy bored housewives, widows and spinsters. who didn't even particularly care about poor women the wives of the men without votes.
It's not just in the UK. In India, rich urbanites frequently go on field trips to the countryside to express a desire to live like the humble farmer- and meanwhile the humble farmer wishes they had the money to live like the urbanites. All these "justice" movements are movements perpetrated by the bourgeoise upper class of a country- a class whose needs are so thoroughly fulfilled (by that country's standards) that they have to make up problems to solve.
Never. The suffragettes were tossing bombs during times of war to gain political power. In the US non land owning men got the vote in exchange for the draft. Skin in the game. Suffragette terrorism made women the superior class. What followed, prohibition (its concequences, the NFA and FBI are still felt today) was the death knell for the country. The waves after that have been about expanding womens consequence free privliges and nothing more.
Women getting the right to vote would have happened on its own. No taxation without representation. Industrialization meant that lots of women were entering the work force and they were starting to look like taxpayers. Look back in history and you'll find women that got the right to vote because they became a widow and inherited something generating money which meant that they were paying a significant amount of taxes. Like Lydia Taft, born in 1712. There are more examples in different western countries but I don't remember their names.
I mean, taxpayer is still synonymous with someone that has the right to vote. So what happens if we look at two very well known tax havens in the west, like Switzerland and Lichtenstein? Well, in Switzerland women got the right to vote in 1971 and in Lichtenstein it happened in 1984. In Monaco, also famous for their low taxes, women got the right to vote in 1962. Weird coincidences, right?
