JoeForrester1975
kiwifarms.net
His speech brought me to tears. He was a supreme gentleman of the highest order.
inb4 bay of pigs
We were probably going to get sucked into that mess eventually no matter who was president at the time.He also got us into Vietnam.
I don't have a lot of time so I couldn't find any funny images to reply to this with, but I just wanted you to know I can now say I once googled "president kennedy yaoi" at work and it's because of you.He was really pretty.
Admit it, you'd fuck him.
"I’ll have those niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years."LBJ was better because he could actually get shit done after JFK got whacked.
Also his quote "ask not what your country can do for you" symbolizes a much different time in the Democratic party when they weren't trying to make literally everyone reliant on the state.
Milton Friedman said:In a much quoted passage in his inaugural address, President Kennedy said, ''Ask not what your country can do for you ask what you can do for your country." It is a striking sign of the temper of our times that the controversy about this passage centered on its origin and not on its content. Neither half of the statement expresses a relation between the citizen and his government that is worthy of the ideals of free men in a free society. The paternalistic "what your country can do for you" implies that government is the patron, the citizen the ward, a view that is at odds with the free man's belief in his own responsibility for his own destiny. The organismic, "what you can do for your country" implies that government is the master or the deity, the citizen, the servant or the votary. To the free man, the country is the collection of individuals who compose it, not something over and above them. He is proud of a common heritage and loyal to common traditions. But he regards government as a means, an instrumentality, neither a grantor of favors and gifts, nor a master or god to be blindly worshipped and served. He recognizes no national goal except as it is the consensus of the goals that the citizens severally serve. He recognizes no national purpose except as it is the consensus of the purposes for which the citizens severally strive.
Camelot was a myth and the Kennedy myth has overshadowed the man himself. SJWs today would find him problematic. Same with LBJ.