Wasnt Atheism made in the 60s by Socialists? -

ShadowTheHedgehog

kiwifarms.net
Because in the 50s they had values that stealing and lying is bad.

But the 60s changed it, with the idea that Manipulation and stealing was ok. So Socialists became part of the decadent movement, and these values shaped it, and guess what the core values of a socialist is? Manipulation and Stealing, exactly, media deception, dishonesty etc. And Atheism is very often tied to it. So thats really where you can trace it down too. The 60s.

For example. Atheists often say people are killed in name of religion, but nobody was killed in name of Atheism? One manipulation tactic they use.

But by that logic. Religious people kill in name of theocracy but not in the name of religion, just like Communism was killed in the name of Communism but not in the name of Atheism. The ideology is either pro religious or anti religious. And Communists killed 100 millions aprox and Nazis killed 6 millions.

Either case. You can see it being shaped in the 60s, the modern day douchebags of decadent movement. Here is a chart
crime.jpg
 

ShadowTheHedgehog

kiwifarms.net
Atheist were around since the 1800s as a result of nihilism movement, although they could have been around earlier.
Yes but the douchebag type that exist with socialism and atheism today is purely the culture from the 1960s. Low energy hippies, manipulators and media cash grabs, fake news, making racism cool to sell papers. That stuff
 

NerdShamer

International Glownigger Commander
kiwifarms.net
Yes but the douchebag type that exist with socialism and atheism today is purely the culture from the 1960s. Low energy hippies, manipulators and media cash grabs, fake news, making racism cool to sell papers. That stuff
Dude, atheism under Marxism was done to keep the workers in the factories.

Seriously, a quick trip through the web will prove this.
 

ShadowTheHedgehog

kiwifarms.net
Douchebag new atheism became a thing in the late 90s early 2000s with people like Richard Dawkins dunking on creationists/theologians. Ironically, it created a religion of science as scripture and considered an embarrassment of atheism.
Take a wild guess what timeline Dawkins was born into?
Monty Python also sorta participated in that culture too. While it was comedy, it def took part in the manipulative culture that media and people was shaping up too.
"
BornClinton Richard Dawkins
26 March 1941 (age 80)
Nairobi, Colony and Protectorate of Kenya
 

Un Platano

big blatano xDDDD
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Douchebag new atheism became a thing in the late 90s early 2000s with people like Richard Dawkins dunking on creationists/theology. Ironically, it created a religion of science as scripture and is considered an embarrassment to atheism.
I think the enlightened atheist mindset emerged as a kneejerk reaction to the brand of fundamentalism that was popular at the time. Fundamentalism became popular in the late eighties and died off at the end of the 00's. Accordingly the enlightened atheists came a few years after them and disappeared a few years after them too. They're both still around of course, but they're much smaller and lack the voice as they used to have.
 

Harlay de Champvallon

Archevêque de Paris, Duc de Saint-Cloud
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Socrates was falsely accused of atheism and put atheistic statements in the mouths of some of his characters, as did Plato. An early and definite atheist was one Theodorus the atheist of c. 300 BC. He possibly was the source for the far more significant Epicurus, who was not an atheist, but minimised the influence of the gods. The sixties was a sort of Indian Summer for Communists and related materialists. The Soviet invasion of Hungary had discredited Soviet Communism, but that took time to filter through academia which had been largely infiltrated. Later they switched to forms of political correctness and finally wokery, so as not to be tied to one or more big state.
 

ShadowTheHedgehog

kiwifarms.net
Another question? Do you think BLM was made to make awareness of racism? Or to just cash in big time by bigstream media? Thats your answer. And its all made possible, thanks to the 1960s culture of manipulators and profit.

If Americans.... or non socialist would make something work. Several political parties that removes centralized voting. One example is "Labour party (Social democracy)" its a start atleast. Make as many parties you ideologically agree with and stop two party system voting.

Guns i guess kill 6000 individuals each year in America. And knife stabbing 1000 deaths, whether its in Europe or America. Pro gun people use it to argue, to feel like the government cant get them or their property. Whether that creates a massive paranoia of some crazy dude with gun at workplace or school... you get that risk? But i always see it as, if government or left wingers became crazy enough, they could implement the same method. So i never 100% understood the fight for guns.

Either case. My point is. Culturally... Atheism and socialism from the 1960s.. Atleast American Socialists of Atheists.... have this douchebag culture following that era. Not saying this is only Americans but it sure is part of the 1960s.
 

Beautiful Border

kiwifarms.net
Douchebag new atheism became a thing in the late 90s early 2000s with people like Richard Dawkins dunking on creationists/theology. Ironically, it created a religion of science as scripture and is considered an embarrassment to atheism.
New atheism makes sense when you take into account that a lot of them had strict fundamentalist upbringings that in many cases were abusive. If you grew up under the thumb of a zealously religious household then I think you can be forgiven for liking Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens in your teenage years. Most people cool down and have a more nuanced view of the matter as they get older.
 

ShadowTheHedgehog

kiwifarms.net
New atheism makes sense when you take into account that a lot of them had strict fundamentalist upbringings that in many cases were abusive. If you grew up under the thumb of a zealously religious household then I think you can be forgiven for liking Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens in your teenage years. Most people cool down and have a more nuanced view of the matter as they get older.
If lying and manipulating your parents is considered, a way to get away from abuse?. Then those people suck. Dishonesty is something i hate no matter what one thinks. That culture stinks rotten balls. You deserve whatever comes to you if you cant be upright about the problems. As far as i know i have Christian parents growing up. Theist but i dont believe in Abrahamic religions. But i never tried to deceive or be dishonest to them about my intentions. I think only time you are hiding something is if you are unsure, afraid or just not sure. But legit dishonesty, is shit.

I just think it was a cool thing to be anti religious is all. It was a thing in 90s. When porn with balloon tits was great. And they assume a real life documentary on how evil religion is, is to watch some drama show by HBO, True Blood. As if that represents it or something.

At best, the nature of devotion culture in government like lets say "Catholicism and Sunni Islam" is bad for society because it makes it not develop, but work cultures like Protestantism or Secularism means they develop and go forward. As for abuse..... there is lots of elements. Religion can be one of them, but not always. I doubt being raised by Manginas or man hating feminists would have better positive effect on childhood than some conservative manly parents or godfearing ones.
 

Helvítis Túristi

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
It was a thing in 90s. When porn with balloon tits was great. And they assume a real life documentary on how evil religion is, is to watch some drama show by HBO, True Blood. As if that represents it or something.
Wasn't this stuff in the 2000's?

Edit: Yeah, true blood was 2008.
 
Last edited:

Krystal

Please don't look up porn of me.
kiwifarms.net
Here's a crosspost of mine from that shcismatic schizo that got into an argument with @Marshal Mannerheim on the pope that I think can fit in here.
Here's a chicken or the egg question that I think is perfect for this thread. Are people autistic because religion is autistic or is religion autistic because people are autistic? As a Catholic myself (not trad-Cath, mind you) I think the latter.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

LISTEN &/OR BELIEVE Atheism
Why it's the only true belief of gamergaters
Replies
6
Views
842
The Zionist state is now fighting on four fronts as protestors mass at the Lebanese and Jordanian borders, while it's cities "domestic tranquility" breaks down to mayhem
Replies
103
Views
4K
Top