Most likely it will first be used in some medical context, for example brain-chips for paraplegics which is already a thing , the problem is that so far brain-chip have just been used to help overcome disabilities so there's really no reason for the average person to get it. But once the technology is streamlined then it's just a matter of time until someone figures out how to get 3D VR porn onto brain-chip and then it's pretty much done deal. In principle the technology could a sort of futuristic version of google glass (one where you won't get beaten up in a bar) allowing for augmented reality potentially even replacing smarts phones and smart watches. Granted this wouldn't necessarily replace the internet but would just be an additional device being connected onto the internet.While it seems there's a small consensus on this thread about invasive mechanical implants being what succeeds the internet, I don't see them becoming a mainstream thing thing anytime soon
Huh, I never thought about it before, but superchats are the same thing as people calling into hackey tv shows with prizes and such, just over a different medium.It started with the Town crier, then the printing press and the newspaper (with its advertising model), then the radio and the TV, now we have podcasts/social media/youtube and whatever you can get up to with cheap general computing devices wired up together with Internet Protocols. The utility of the infrastructure is the key idea, the printing press wasn't optimal until the newspaper used it, the electric transmission of audio and later video in radio and later cable/satellite TV wasn't optimal until telephony connected everyone together. The internet will be no different. First a series of simple HTML read-only websites, then video and Videochat took over. Camgirls seem to have chanced upon the financial model for the technology but optimally it shows up as Superchats taking place within a Live chat beside some social focal point which like a TV show brings strangers together. This model will persist, I believe, through the modern censorious backlash. People would rather live in a world with Superchats directing a live Snuff Film somewhere in the bowels of the Internet than live in a world with a boot stamping on a face forever so in the worst possible usage the model is still more acceptable than a lack of it - or at least as ignorable for internet users as Jeffery Epstein was for New Yorkers.