- Nov 14, 2012
Just another thought… I wonder part of the reason they lack these traits is because the instinct and ability to properly care for others is a deeper trait that you see in more well-rounded individuals, and the guys we’re talking about here are nearly always more shallow than a puddle. There just seems to be nothing going on in their heads aside from “coom and consoom”: They rarely seem to have any interests outside of trans-related stuff, porn, and technology and other stereotypical geek hobbies.It's also interesting that you never come across an MtF person that you'd describe as "mothering." Some of them will fetishize it to an extreme and go well out of their way to describe themselves as "Big titty trans mommy" or some vomit-inducing variation of it, but then you wind up looping back into aesthetics again, because apart from the superficial appearance, nothing about their behaviour is indicative of an ability to perform or mimic motherhood. As before, they've mistakenly assumed that "mother" is just an extension of "MILF" and ran off to the masturbation races.
They're usually incredibly easy to pick out even if they do an outstanding job of passing, or even if I'm only interacting with them through a digital medium, because they always have unmistakably male mannerisms, even or especially if they're pushing as hard as they can to come across as female. Nine times out of ten it's the aggressive over-sexuality that gives it away, but it's also the way that they communicate it, because they don't come across like a nymphomaniacal woman, they come across as a man's assumption of how a nymphomaniacal woman would act, which is significantly more crude than they actually talk or behave.Just another thought… I wonder part of the reason they lack these traits is because the instinct and ability to properly care for others is a deeper trait that you see in more well-rounded individuals, and the guys we’re talking about here are nearly always more shallow than a puddle. There just seems to be nothing going on in their heads aside from “coom and consoom”: They rarely seem to have any interests outside of trans-related stuff, porn, and technology and other stereotypical geek hobbies.
I mean, does anybody ever see most MtFs get deeply into any normal hobbies like gardening or hiking or taking up some sort of craft? Even the few examples I can think of that involve physical activity always seem to come back to transexuality, with them demanding they get to compete as a woman.
Imagine all the stupid, terrible, cliched things you've seen about women in the last 60 years on TV, in movies or whatever else consoomers consoom. That's what they think a woman is. If you're a normal woman and don't act like that then you're not a real woman, no ifs ands or buts about it you TERF CHUD nazi transphobe.
These. It's sexual blackface combined with delusion. They literally believe they're a bangin' hot model or a cute anime girl, and pay no attention to the Adam's Apple, stubble, bulge, or bone structure.Bimbos.
They think being a woman is being the super-barbie sex doll their incel porn told them so before they hopped on the tranny bus.
tends to circle around social awkwardness, "slice of life", and exasperation in friend or family groups, and male humour tends to revolve around slapstick, bodily functions, and absurdism
Why do they see us as a threat?My favorite part is how seemingly an overwhelming majority of them stereotype women--vicariously, through the way they try to express their transition-- through such an astoundingly sexist filter that it becomes barely anything more than misogyny in frilly clothing. It's not enough for them to just identify as female, they have to go balls-to-the-wall (Pun intended) and wear all the girliest Barbie shit that they can find, usually wind up with some rapidly-growing collection of sex toys, fish net stockings, and hooker boots, and then constantly use language that's so sexually aggressive that it's legitimately grotesque.
I've somehow managed to run across an unusual number of transgender people throughout my life, and even made friends with quite a few of them, but they invariably possess all the same sorts of traits. They're hyper-reactionary and will fly to 11 at the drop of a hat, excessively emotional to the point where people with extreme bipolar disorders would tell them to chill out, aggressively sexual to such a degree that it's obviously some sort of nymphomaniacal compulsion that makes you desperately avoid any topics or even words that could be loosely interpreted as sexual, and they always become incredibly defensive around any woman they perceive as some sort of threat, which is.. Most women, to be impolitely honest.
What's curious is that they always focus on what makes a woman aesthetically a female. It's always surface-level observation, every time. Be it the clothes, the make-up, the genitals, and to a less-aesthetic extent, what they perceive to be a woman's sex drive, even though they've clearly plucked it from their abnormally large hoard of Japanese cartoons, because they... Always seem to be obsessed with anime. But when you set aside all of the desperate efforts to make themselves outwardly appear to be female--regardless of whether or not that succeeds-- they fail to understand what makes a woman a woman.
I've yet to meet one who was a 'nest-builder' or a 'home-maker' and to the best of my memory I've yet to meet one that also didn't outright hate children. James Damore's memo always pops into my head during this sort of conversation because he outlined two very specific differences between men and women, namely that women are more interested in people and men are always more interested in things, hence why men are unavoidably always going to be the top 99 in every list of 100 programmers or strange shut-in jobs and hobbies, because women, on average and to a very large extent, do not operate well in isolation and are more concerned with building their social circles and their families than they are much of anything else.
This is also not a trait that I've ever seen a trans person adopt, either pre- or post-transition, and the inverse is just as true for FtM as it is for MtF, because if it were the case, we'd see significantly larger groups of FtM people cropping up in the tech and gaming industries and we'd see a rapid rise in MtF people popping up in.. I don't know, Oprah or home cooking channels or something. Can you name even a single FtM personality in gaming, speed-running and tech circles, or are these industries filled with MtF people?
Their perception of women always begins and ends at the aesthetic, because that's just how the male brain categorizes things, especially when it's essentially been 'trained'--through what I can only assume is a constant stream of pornography and shitty cartoons--to view women, and by extension feminity, as little more than sexual. Granted, all of these opinions are generally why my friendships with trans people seem to only last a handful of months at best, but I've yet to encounter any evidence that leads me to believe that transgendered people are not just gay people who were struck with a mental crisis and veered down the wrong road instead of resolving it properly.
This opinion is only bolstered by the fact that I have yet, not so much as a single time, ever met a trans person who was not raised in an extremely abusive environment. It's definitely not a popular opinion in those circles, but if I see something that appears in 100% of all cases I've encountered, I'm not particularly inclined to just dismiss it as coincidence.
The above is from Rod Flemming's website. He has some fascinating thoughts on the subject, and being that he is very well versed on the subject (of course that doesn't necessarily mean he's correct), and there is a hell of a lot of what he's saying that makes total sense, personally I give some weight to his thoughts.This shows as ‘crushes’ on the self as a girl. Other evidence suggests that events at or around the time of puberty may have triggered the condition. These seem to be associated with very early masturbation and orgasmic experiences.
In other cases, Autogynephilic men have reported a strict upbringing wherein masturbation was forcefully opposed as something that only ‘dirty little boys’ did. It would seem simple to conclude that the subject might have got round this opprobrium by imagining himself as a girl, rather than a boy. Others used plush animals and somehow this became connected to the sense of self as a girl. (Exactly how this mechanism works is not clear but it seems to be something like ‘masturbating using a girl’s toy makes me a girl’ — and autogynephilia does the rest.)
What do boys/young teenagers think women are? They then spend so much time in their own heads, creating who they think they are, the reality could never get a foothold. The following sums that up better.Non-homosexual male transitioners, AGPs, are frequently at pains to distance themselves from the ‘gay’ lifestyle but they have significant links to it. In their narcissism they are similar to the Narcissistic Homosexual male, as we have just shown. The distinction is only that the former is aroused by the thought or image of himself not just as a woman, but as his ‘ideal woman’, while the latter is aroused by the thought or image of himself as his ‘ideal man’. Naturally these ideals are strictly artefacts of the underlying narcissism and cannot exist in the real world.
AGPs are attracted, through a variety of mechanisms, to the idea of themselves as women. This is a form of auto-eroticism dependent on what Blanchard called an ‘Erotic Target Location Error’. They invent a pseudo-feminine second character who becomes the object of their erotic desire. This, in the right circumstances, can take over the host, causing him to believe that he is ‘actually female’ — since the second personality was invented as a pseudo-woman.
You know how ugly women always go on passive-aggressive or even overtly-aggressive screeds against women that are more attractive than they are, essentially trying to sink in any barb they can just to drag the other woman down a peg? It's that, just with more stubble. "That's what men find attractive? She's just bones, men like curves! I bet she doesn't even cook! Look at how tacky her shoes are! Real women don't need to get all dolled up like that because we're way too busy taking care of kids!"Why do they see us as a threat?
Because they are narcissists, and they only care about themselves, for them nothing but what they think, what they believe is real, so anyone trying to tell them anything different, is a threat.Why do they see us as a threat?
Slight OT but related - This is something a lot girlfriends confided in me as to why they enjoy gay mens company: the ability to talk frankly with no holds barred sans the double edge of sexual tension between her and a hetero male (friendships often break because men become infatuated).You know how ugly women always go on passive-aggressive or even overtly-aggressive screeds against women that are more attractive
I think the popularity of drag queens hasn't helped either.These. It's sexual blackface combined with delusion. They literally believe they're a bangin' hot model or a cute anime girl, and pay no attention to the Adam's Apple, stubble, bulge, or bone structure.
Yep. I've heard several Muslims say that women should veil themselves and be accompanied by men because they're like precious diamonds and like diamonds, they need to be protected. Part of the reason some Muslims think it's alright to restrict women's rights is because they value them.A woman to them is someone that people like to look at, pay attention to, seek the approval of and desire to be with.
A lot of it simply stems from self loathing, they think guys or at least they, look like shit, they're schlubs no one pays any serious attention to, so why wouldn't they instead want to try to be a pretty lady that someone would desire? Even if they get attention simply for being "stunning and brave" and not actual sexual attraction it's a step up from being a schlubby loser nobody.
Feminists like to talk about harmful beauty standards and ignore the fact that it's way, way worse for men, the standard of beauty for men is something that is much harder to achieve than it is for women, your average woman is closer to the traditional standard of female beauty than your average guy is to Arnold Schwarzenegger, Chris Hemsworth or Brad Pitt.
The dirty little secret is human civilization has almost always been the opposite of what feminists say it is, women have almost always been more valued than men, which is why they were kept away from the battlefields, kept away from the "dirty game" of politics, of the stress of having to run society and make the hard decisions, it's not because people saw women as inferior, it was because they saw them as better than that, as having more important things to do.
Even middle east society, as harsh as it is on women, is very harsh on men as well, men are the ones expected to first and foremost strap bombs on themselves and blow themselves up, to fight and die for jihad, men also face harsh punishments if they step out of line as well, you can boil it down and debate who exactly has it worst, maybe it's an exception and women do have it worse in the middle east, but it ain't exactly a case of every guy just yucking it up either, it's harsh on everyone.
Women almost always are and almost always have been the real privledged ones in society and men have never before been valued less than in modern western society, guys have woken up to that fact and they've tried to attain what little female priviledge they can, this is why they trigger TERFS so much (and not saying TERFS are entirely wrong, but they ain't exactly entirely right either)