Can I see a photo of thismy e-waste closet.
One absurd interpretation of that happened in Finland some years ago due to their interpretation of EU law. A guy was driving hella drunk and hit someone that later died, he had fled the scene at that point of course but iirc the person would have survived if he had called an ambulance. He was found, charged and convicted of that but freed for not calling an ambulance and not reporting the accident. Doing that would incriminate himself because driving drunk is illegal. If he had been sober it would have been a different story.Funnily, on the other hand, encrypting all your data and then not wanting to give the key to law enforcement might - and this is depending on where you live - actually be more helpful because some countries have rules making it impossible to punish somebody for refusing to bring forth evidence against himself in such a manner or make it impossible to force somebody to cooperate in an investigation against oneself in such a way.
This is an extension of the right to remain silent, basically the right not to be forced to incriminate yourself. It’s the reason you can’t be thrown in jail generally for not giving a password to an encrypted disk. However, biometrics is another issue, because it’s not knowledge, so it’s get murky, and even in the US, biometrics are fair game. Varies by country, but most countries that have common law in their legislative history will have a right to remain silent.One absurd interpretation of that happened in Finland some years ago due to their interpretation of EU law. A guy was driving hella drunk and hit someone that later died, he had fled the scene at that point of course but iirc the person would have survived if he had called an ambulance. He was found, charged and convicted of that but freed for not calling an ambulance and not reporting the accident. Doing that would incriminate himself because driving drunk is illegal. If he had been sober it would have been a different story.
It's a pity that such cases are often abused as "proof" to whittle away rights you'll never get back once taken away.One absurd interpretation of that happened in Finland some years ago due to their interpretation of EU law.
Yes, I think the UK (big surprise there) is one of the countries where this doesn't apply and you have to hand out passwords. Not sure though.This is an extension of the right to remain silent, basically the right not to be forced to incriminate yourself.
I only want to abuse it as proof that Brussels should go fuck themselves.It's a pity that such cases are often abused as "proof" to whittle away rights you'll never get back once taken away.