What is worse? A pedophole tranny or a TERF who wants to kill all men? -
- Thread starter Just Dont
- Start date
-
Intermittent Denial of Service attack is causing downtime. Looks like a kiddie 5 min rental. Waiting on a response from upstream.
Solution
At least the TERF is right about Tommy Tooter
a terf just needs a good dicking
Beautiful Border
kiwifarms.net
Pretty much nobody is worse than a pedophile so the tranny wins by default
Jebu Nagazi
kiwifarms.net
Cant we just put them both in a ring & let them kill each other?
Most men are fine with certain women hating them. They can even be in the same workplace and still get a project done while maintaining mutual hatred. No normal adult wants to see the innocents of a child get corrupted or lost because a subhuman is sexually attracted to them and acts upon it.
Whether they're a tranny or not the pedo is the worse one. While radfems can be quite hateful and shitty, they are mostly just full of hot air and don't attempt to actually harm others.
Pedos don't care about the physical and psychological damage they do to their young victims. Which is why most sane people have such disgust for them.
Pedos don't care about the physical and psychological damage they do to their young victims. Which is why most sane people have such disgust for them.
I mean the TERF is just the r63 version of an internet tough guy who doesn't go through with what they're saying and are more likely to break down in tears when being confronted/confronting. The pedo on the otherhand probably does or at least wants to act on their urges and probably has a shit ton of child porn on their PC.
I would say the pedo is worse and deserves the bullet.
I would say the pedo is worse and deserves the bullet.
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
terfs are nasty and delusional but ultimately harmless
tranny pedos are nasty and delusional too, plus very disgusting, and actually pose a real danger to real children if allowed access to them
tranny pedos are nasty and delusional too, plus very disgusting, and actually pose a real danger to real children if allowed access to them
It’s a basic threat assessment IMO. One is women threatening to harm men (lol), and the other is men threatening to harm children. Only one of these scenarios actually can happen, which makes it worse.
The numbers of feminists who have actually physically harmed, let alone killed men, is vanishing small (Valerie Solanas?)
Whereas paedo troons are pretty much commonplace.
Thus paedo troons are the bigger, most credible threat, and therefore the worst of the two by a significant margin.
Whereas paedo troons are pretty much commonplace.
Thus paedo troons are the bigger, most credible threat, and therefore the worst of the two by a significant margin.
Plus pedo ftms are becoming a thing
Men can defend themselves, children can't.
