What's worse? Ultra-Progressive or Islam? - Where's society headed?

  • Intermittent Denial of Service attack is causing downtime. Looks like a kiddie 5 min rental. Looking into some solutions.

Medicated

Pedophile
kiwifarms.net
I've been having this question knock around in my head for a while. Following the news coming out of Sweden and such.

And so I wanted to ask you all a question.

If you had to choose between a Ultra-Progressive society, like say Sweden in two more years probably. Versus an Islamic Society like say Iran or someplace similar.

Which would you choose to live in?
 

AnOminous

each malted milk ball might be their last
True & Honest Fan
Retired Staff
kiwifarms.net
If you had to choose between a Ultra-Progressive society, like say Sweden in two more years probably. Versus an Islamic Society like say Iran or someplace similar.

Which would you choose to live in?

If you have the first, you'll get the second.

But if you have the second, you live in a medieval shithole with no technology and nothing to do but fuck goats.
 

AtrocityVoyeur

Menschliches, Allzumenschliches
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
It's hard to imagine a completely progressive society. Sweden comes close but they retain aspects of traditional democracy. There's a bit of paperwork limiting refugees, there's no draconian system to punish non-progressive speech (like Canada is creating), and so on.

I tend to think any "ultra progressive" society would be completely over-run by radical Islam immigrants, which is what we see happening in Sweden.

But... progressives let Islamists get away with shit because they're an aggrieved minority. So if they WERE the majority, would the non-progressive conduct of some Islamic refugees (rape, harassment, etc.) get persecuted as much as the bad sexual behavior of wypipo in America?

I'm guessing no. Progressivism in its modern form is really just a form of revenge against male wypipo and once it achieves that goal it has nothing else to live for, and would be destroyed.
 

Doug_Hitzel

A healthy, young man
kiwifarms.net
Two sides of the same ideological coin. It does not matter to me whichever would exist; although, neither should. I suppose the worse of the two would be the one that ratifies caedephilia. I had to create a word for what I mean because necrophilia is insufficient. Necrophilia is already legal in several states, such as Vermont and Kansas. If necrophilia is sexual arousal by corpses, then caedephilia, by contrast, is sexual arousal by murder.

I have no idea which ideology will allow caedephilia first, and I do not care enough to ponder it.
I believe you’re talking about real-life guro, unless I misunderstood what “caedephilia” means.
 

Doug_Hitzel

A healthy, young man
kiwifarms.net
From cursory research, 'guro' seems to have a brutal, gory element to its paraphilia. Caedephilia does not require this. The focus of caedephilia will be on ending the bodily existence of a human being before, during, or after a sex act. In most cases, I can predict that this will be done with a gun, so it may perhaps be gory, but the sexual arousal of caedephilia does not come from the gore. Caedephilia derives sexual arousal from the act of murder itself. So, simply overdosing a victim on fentanyl or some other chemical substance repurposed for homocide would also suffice.
I think the term “erotophonophiliamight be the one you’re looking for.
 
Top