Remember that any white nationalists who claim to not hold other races in contempt are just following the long tradition started by hitler of bullshittingAdolf Hitler said:
White nationalists not holding other races in contempt -
- Thread starter autisticdragonkin
- Start date
- Status
Black nationalists get to be not racist in the by not being white so they don't have to spew as much bullshit about being not racist
Racism is not the hate of other race. It's the beliefs that some races are superior to others.
What nationalists generally want is separations of races by nation, regardless of who is superior.
While being generally racists, being dishonnest in their beliefs and intentions is not anywhere close to their main flaws. They are often quite vocals about their unconventional opinions.
What nationalists generally want is separations of races by nation, regardless of who is superior.
While being generally racists, being dishonnest in their beliefs and intentions is not anywhere close to their main flaws. They are often quite vocals about their unconventional opinions.
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I only hold racetraitors and niggerlovers in contempt.
E
EI 903
Guest
kiwifarms.net
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Hitler created separate nations for the slavic lesser races and even tried to create one for the Jews, so he clearly wasn't bullshitting.
Gayligula
kiwifarms.net
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I'm proud that God loved me enough to make me white.
Please, everybody knows you're Philippino
Smoke weed everyday.
What the fuck are you even trying to say here?
He is saying that black nationalists have the privilege of not being seen as racists by the liberal medias, and as such do not have to look as much for excuses. It would be a valid point, if white nationalists cared about how they were portreyed in those liberal medias.
y'know if you changed
"Pride in one's own race – and that does not imply contempt for other races – is also a normal and healthy sentiment."
to
Pride in one's own culture – and that does not imply contempt for other cultures – is also a normal and healthy sentiment.
i think most people would agree. what a difference one word can make
"Pride in one's own race – and that does not imply contempt for other races – is also a normal and healthy sentiment."
to
Pride in one's own culture – and that does not imply contempt for other cultures – is also a normal and healthy sentiment.
i think most people would agree. what a difference one word can make
Tumblr would then proceed to grossly misinterpret "Pride in one's own culture" as more white supremacy propaganda.
Maybe, but while culture is an accident of birth, it's not quite so to the same extent as race is. You actually have to do stuff to be part of a culture--know how to cook the food or do dances or speak the language or whatever. Those are actually things to be proud of. To be part of a race, you just have to...be born into it. There's nothing you actually accomplish to justify "pride" in it.
Last edited:
It's usually used by racists as some kind of generic term for every good thing that ever existed in all of history. Or by supposedly pro-black racists as a generic term for every kind of evil that ever happened.
There are certainly white-dominated things out there worthy of note, like "the Western canon." White supremacy isn't part of that, though, and not all parts of it are, strictly speaking, white in origin.
- Status
Similar threads
