Who is the most evil? -

[BrunoMattei]

If the definition of "evil" is thus: causing the most suffering in the world and changing the world for the worst. Then who do you Kiwi's sincerely believe is the most evil? If we could avoid sarcastic "It's Null!" answers then great but I'm no dictator (pardon the pun). If you truly believe that Mark Zuckerberg is worse than Hitler then let's hear it.

If we're going with just the raw body count there have been many worse men then Hitler. Stalin killed about 20 million of his people through famines. Mao killed about 50 million Chinese. And supposedly King Leopold killed roughly 100 million. But those guys aren't the go-to poster children of the definition of evil like Hitler.

 

[Rand /pol/]

Somari1996

 

[break these cuffs]

THe jews

 

[Irrational Exuberance]

We are - all of us are contributing to the "most" suffering in the world and changing the world for the worst.

Think about it - if we single out a single person or people group as "more evil", do we do this in order to actually seek to better ourselves by acting contrarily, or do we simply want to use a scapegoat in order to show ourselves as "less evil"?

 

[Bluetooter]

Taco Bell's family size taco pack because it beckons me every time i go there, and I ended up being enticed by it's siren calls. Then after i consume them, I end up on the toilet for almost 90 minutes.

 

[Piss Clam]

So far I believe Europeans as a group are in first place. As far as death, slavery, destruction.

I'm not saying they changed the world for the worst, but that they left the most destructive path.

 

[Black Waltz]

Me obviously

 

[Bluetooter]

So far I believe Europeans as a group are in first place. As far as death, slavery, destruction.

I would definitely say the middle eastern people are- they are still doing horrid things today.

 

[BrunoMattei]

We are - all of us are contributing to the "most" suffering in the world and changing the world for the worst.

Think about it - if we single out a single person or people group as "more evil", do we do this in order to actually seek to better ourselves by acting contrarily, or do we simply want to use a scapegoat in order to show ourselves as "less evil"?

For the sake of argument let's say there's a gun to your head and you're forced to select one particular individual then who would it be?

 

[Arcturus]

@BoingoTango

 

[maalikthefakemuzzie]

libruls.

 

[Piss Clam]

I would definitely say the middle eastern people are- they are still doing horrid things today.

I would go one step further and say Muslims are. Look at all the conflicts around the world and you will find people killing other people in the name of Islam.

They are not trying to change the world for the better, they are trying to wipe out science and progress for their 7th century views.

 

[Frank D'arbo]

Fat Fuck Frank

 

[wateryketchup]

If we're going with just the raw body count there have been many worse men then Hitler. Stalin killed about 20 million of his people through famines. Mao killed about 50 million Chinese. And supposedly King Leopold killed roughly 100 million. But those guys aren't the go-to poster children of the definition of evil like Hitler.

I think a lot of it is who was killed. Stalin and Mao killed their own people (for the most part), but Hitler specifically targeted minorities in Europe. Also, America was only involved in war against Hitler (since they never actually went to war against Russia and China), and they've had a huge influence on pop culture/politics for about a century now. ALSO, in Chairman Mao's case, there are many people in China today who still believe that he was a great leader who led their country to prosperity, which I would argue is why you hear even less of people comparing him to Satan than even Stalin.

 

[Bluetooter]

I would go one step further and say Muslims are. Look at all the conflicts around the world and you will find people killing other people in the name of Islam.

They are not trying to change the world for the better, they are trying to wipe out science and progress for their 7th century views.

Yeah, completely true- hence how they still have a slave trade going on to this day.

 

[{o{P]

that Nazi woman from the concentration camp who made lamps out of dead childrens skin

i dont think it matters how many people you killed or why you did it but to revel in the murder of innocents like that is fucking horrifying

edit: disregard this i was being retarded

 

[Piss Clam]

that Nazi woman from the concentration camp who made lamps out of dead childrens skin

i dont think it matters how many people you killed or why you did it but to revel in the murder of innocents like that is fucking horrifying

Child sacrifice was quite popular in many civilizations.

I would also like to point out that I do believe the lamps of dead jews is a myth.

Child sacrifice though is pretty solid through archeological evidence.

 

[PL 001]

Stalin or Pol Pot

 

[Exorbital Columnations]

Any man who tries to root out the source or greatest concentration of evil is in danger of committing all manner of atrocities in his misguided pursuit of the good. Hitler's a good example; Stalin, Pol Pot, SJWs, etc.

The reason the knowledge of good and evil is our downfall is because we lack the omniscience to understand the consequences of our actions.

But it's @Ron /pol/.

 

[Piss Clam]

Stalin or Pol Pot

Sorta ironic that the Vietnamese invaded Cambodia and ended the terror of the khmer rouge.

Cambodian–Vietnamese War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[BoingoTango]

Genghis Kahn, Vlad the Impaler or Soros. I don't know it's not something you can really qualify that readily. Some people are bad, some people are really bad. Hard to pick one