Who was the worst British Prime Minister?

[Y2K Baby]

She's a high ranked rube. Whoever it was pulling her strings was fucking with her and she likely didn't even realize it.

What do you think her ass smells like

 

[Slap47]

May ''may'' not even be as conservative as she claims. She strikes me more as a puppet for the Tory party. There is something about her that doesn't seem very original - and by that I don't mean she's ''Thatcher 2'' - she just seems like she's being told by her party to make certain decisions that aren't necessarily her own ideas.

May and the Conservative Party have made it extremely clear that they are opposed to Brexit. The fact that they're in charge of Brexit is a disaster.

 

[The Final Troondown]

Lloyd for authoring the Irish home rule act
Literally giving away territory for party advantage

Eden, the Suez crisis was probably the biggest international humiliation that the United Kingdom has ever suffered (aside from the Japanese capturing Singapore) It essentially shattered any authority or autonomy we had left and we've essentially been a vassal state to the Americans ever since.

Tbf that was the yanks fault
We could have entered a new era of imperialism with their support

The only thing to castigate Eden for is not having nasser captured and executed in public as an example

 

[Jeff teh Dog]

the north votes thatcher

 

[Clint Torez]

This implies the existence of a good Prime Minister

 

[Spunt]

This implies the existence of a good Prime Minister

Thanks for your contribution!

 

[potatofarms]

• May: should never have been allowed in power, then went ahead and did NOTHING with that power, and UGLY.​

• Cameron: poncy prick and utter incompetent with a fierce hatred of the british people he got rich of of.​

• Brown: probably the ugliest male PM, did nothing for the people, fortunately forgettable.​

• Blair: war criminal and simp to the seppos, milked it for all it was worth and then some.​

• Major: Thatchers little lap dog, utterly boring cunt who ONLY didn't seem so bad because of who's shadow he existed under.​

• Thatcher: Mega mega bietch. taught Kyles mom everything she knew. took my free milk away when I was in primary school to save money, sold off EVERY PUBLIC ASSET and still managed to leave the country in debt. Brought in the most draconian laws to stop fun in any guise. If it wasn't for the spin on kicking the Argies off of her secret gasfields she would have got lynched. At least she wasn't a faggot​

• Callaghan: started the trend of left wing parties being actually right wing, just not quite as right wing.​

• Wilson: decriminalised faggottry thus starting UK on the well lubed slope we find ourselves near the bottom of (we hope, and pun unintended) today. On the plus side stopped hangings after 'mistakes were made'​

• Heath: kicked the bejezuz out of the filty micks, thus causing the biggest period of nail bombs in school bins and ground glass in baby food. cheers for that. thats the reason for those tamper proof lids we have today. he ran a tidy ship....well private yacht. scuttled the UK and primed it for scratchbags to get a win. But decimalisation was a win, kind of unfinished.​

• MacMillan: sucked seppo dick whilst merrily sailing us down the river.​

• Eden: through cowardice and collusion lost us the middle east, and possibly marked the start of the current and unending sand-fuckery and its consequences.​

• Attlee: second guilty party for all british lives lost in the war and countless in india, started pakis coming in. On the upside he started the NHS and many other good social schemes including council houses, which then got filled by pakis. cunt​

• Churchill: greatest bodycount of any unelected war criminal, deliberately got us involved in a war because of the debts he accrued to the tribe of the extended proboscis. spent his time drunk as fuck, rude as fuck, couldn't even speak right when he was sober. the nearest thing britain got to hillary clinton, probably touched kids.​

• Chamberlain: after a good start helping to defuse the barbaric treatment of our german cousins after the ToV, he dropped the ball and started drawing lines in the sand. Failed to create an alliance with germany that would have crushed the jews out of existence and put all the other shitskins firmly in their place. Directly responsible for every ounce of shitfuckery that has happened through history since, and the reason we did not colonise the whole solar system by 1960 in atomic spaceships.​

 

[potatofarms]

I actually dislike Churchill. Guy gave excellent speeches but his meddling in the war didn't help much. Hell, it was well known that he was drunk during his speeches and some didn't like that.

It's a shame that most Churchhill criticism is stuff that is just nonsensical like blaming him for famines in India. His "soft underbelly" strat led to the allies getting bottlenecked in Italy and his drama around generals was harmful to the war effort.

and possibly how he moved warfare from military to civilian targets, thus causing astronomical civilian casualties on both sides with firebombings. getting shot in action is one thing but burning kids alive in their beds brings us to a whole new level.

 

[Slap47]

Yeah the British fucked these places over when they needed them most. Of course, Rhodesia and South Africa even as rogue states still functioned hundreds of times better than what they devolved to once they were “liberated”

They were first world countries with third world demographics. A sign to come for countries who embrace diversity and multiculturalism.

The extremism of the Black African left in Rhodesia and South Africa was pretty much a reaction to the extreme racism of austerity of the apartheid regimes. They could blame all of their problems on white and brown people as the economy crumbled because of their ideologies.

Botswana was able to escape African Socialism and its not a coincidence that their apartheid was more benign if not non-existent.

and possibly how he moved warfare from military to civilian targets, thus causing astronomical civilian casualties on both sides with firebombings. getting shot in action is one thing but burning kids alive in their beds brings us to a whole new level.

The narrative is that Churchhill got Hitler to focus on people instead of airfields, thus saving Britain. Not sure about that.

However, strategic bombing did not really help much. The Germans never had shortages of vehicles or equipment, sure it was shoddily made by slaves as the German craftsmen/artisans went to war, but they always had enough stuff. They built factories in the forest that the allies never discovered until after the war. The issue was fuel, and people to actually be soldiers. The terror bombing just made the Germans think this was a war of existence and fight harder...

 

[Penrowe]

The Germans never had shortages of vehicles or equipment

This is halfway accurate. One major issue with the german war economy (apart from shortages of fuel/labor/capital goods) was how different offices with overlapping areas of authority would approve/cancel/re-approve contracts without coordinating with the other parties involved and how different gauleiters would seldom cooperate and instead fiercely defended their local industries from having to retool/move in order to keep profits flowing in their provinces, resulting in a whole mess of different guns/calibers/equipment being manufactured not because it filled a pressing need but because there were so many personal/political obstacles before one could alter production lines. Not to mention the hardship involved in shipping the finished goods to the front line.
While the third reich never had shortages of vehicles or equipment, they were often inadequate, outdated or inappropriate for the campaigns being fought and almost never reached the soldiers that needed resupply in a timely manner.

 

[X Pac Heat]

Everyone knows it was Lord Palmerston

 

[Apis mellifera]

>still living in the UK in [current year].
Even burgerland has better living conditions if you land a comfy job.

 

[NevskyProspekt]

Yeah the British fucked these places over when they needed them most. Of course, Rhodesia and South Africa even as rogue states still functioned hundreds of times better than what they devolved to once they were “liberated”

They were first world countries with third world demographics. A sign to come for countries who embrace diversity and multiculturalism.

South African whites fucked themselves over. It was they who imported enormous numbers of blacks for stupidly cheap labour in the mines because the Afrikaners couldn't be bothered to mine their own gold. They just wanted their massive welfare state without doing any of the hard labor to pay for it - not to mention the total lack of respect of private property rights for the blacks who were born there, had their citizenship and property seized from them, only to be shipped off to the matchbox-housing mass townships on some of the worst real estate in the country. Modern-day South Africa is a shithole in many respects and the murders and attacks on whites currently in South Africa are totally wrong and unjustifiable, but Apartheid South Africa was hardly a utopia. It was an extremely unevenly developed police state that wanted all the benefits of an American-style settler state with a European-style welfare system, but without any of the sacrifice of their own labor to build it.

Rhodesia on the other hand is honestly a much sadder case, because it had enormous potential and was nowhere near as severe in its discrimination as South Africa. It was just as much a victim of outside meddling - and, in the end, it was Apartheid South Africa that betrayed them.

The extremism of the Black African left in Rhodesia and South Africa was pretty much a reaction to the extreme racism of austerity of the apartheid regimes. They could blame all of their problems on white and brown people as the economy crumbled because of their ideologies.

Botswana was able to escape African Socialism and its not a coincidence that their apartheid was more benign if not non-existent.

Namibia to a lesser extent as well. Botswana really is a brilliant example of a country that started out as among the poorest in the world and played its cards absolutely right, bringing itself to developed-world status. Seretse Khama was a brilliant leader and a largely unrecognized star of national leadership worth studying in depth.

 

[bot_for_hire]

Boris Johnson. The narcissistic clown.

 

[celebrityskin]

Rhodesia on the other hand is honestly a much sadder case, because it had enormous potential and was nowhere near as severe in its discrimination as South Africa. It was just as much a victim of outside meddling - and, in the end, it was Apartheid South Africa that betrayed them.

The Rhodesians were just middle-class/upper-middle class Anglos with British passports treating an entire country like a country club or trophy hunting holiday. They were much closer to the white settlers in Kenya than Afrikaners.

 

[Sweetpeaa]

Boris Johnson. The narcissistic clown.

Pray for UK... Holy shit. Not again.

 

[Yuri_]

Much like Cthulu, the eternal anglo is a cosmic entity. British leaders are merely masks worn by the same horrific being.

If one were to pull back the illusion that surrounds the british people, you would bear witness to a monster made of writhing tentacles, thousands of empty eyes, and a mouth full of millions of crooked teeth.

 

[uncleShitHeel]

View attachment 2617133

Pray for UK... Holy shit. Not again.

I wonder if the mounted Calvary will make the horses wear masks this time?

 

[Cyclonus]

 

[HarryHowler]

View attachment 2617133

Pray for UK... Holy shit. Not again.

Seems that you can get away with a lot when two of the three main opposition parties are regarded as pretty much treasonous by 52% of the population, and the other party only bothers nominating candidates in Scotland.