Are they that demoralized, or do they still think it's the 1950s?
Why are conservatives so milquetoast and weak? - Golly gee willickers, I'll just let this glow in the dark fuck my wife, because I'm an honorable American!
- Thread starter Tardar the Barbarian
- Start date
- Highlight
- #3
Any radical is inherently weak, no matter their political leaning. People who are radicalized are easier to break because they can't accept opinions and points of view different from their own.
When you spend your days inside an echochamber that caters to your delusions, you become weak minded and lose all theory of mind. You automatically assume the world should think like you because your friends are telling you all the time how right you are.
The extreme-left is also like this. Use the wrong pronoun or say that dysphoria is a mental health issue and watch the dangerhairs crash and burn around you.
When you spend your days inside an echochamber that caters to your delusions, you become weak minded and lose all theory of mind. You automatically assume the world should think like you because your friends are telling you all the time how right you are.
The extreme-left is also like this. Use the wrong pronoun or say that dysphoria is a mental health issue and watch the dangerhairs crash and burn around you.
No, they're just retards with a terminal case of dunning-krugers. Anyone who's smart realized a long time ago that it's better to join the liberal side, hence why almost all rich people, corporations, and instutitions (you know, the successful, intelligent, and powerful people who make the gears of the country turn) support the left. No one with an ounce of intelligence would join a side that goes out of its way to destroy itself.
It's less of a conservative issue and more of a radical issue. I don't see the average conservative, liberal or progressive crying about the death of America and leaving the country because their candidate lost, I see those faggy e-celebs doing that while desperately attempting to become the resistance as a final effort to stay relevant during their opponents presidential term.
It's sad that people let themselves fall down that rabbit hole where the world seems like a nightmare because dammit, there are other people out there who aren't like me and I just can't be happy with that!
And it is weakness because fundamentally it's an inability to deal with the unfamiliar and a desire to have everything around you be the same.
Yeah man. People who can't adapt to new ideas and concepts as the world moves on are faded to fall into a pit of ignorance, which gets harder and harder to get out as you get more and more radicalized. Society is always changing, you liking it or not. What is good and dandy today could be considered a crime in the future, who knows. See slavery for example.
I have a strong dislike for radicalized people, be from the left or from the right, because they lost the capacity of thinking critically and by themselves. They just repeat buzzwords and then pat themselves on the back because their pack approved of it.
Honestly, I can't hold a rational, mature conversation with a person who believes the earth is flat, vaccines cause autism or men with beards should be allowed in women's bathrooms.
I completely agree with you. To survive, you need to be flexible. being far left or far right, makes you unable to handle life. people usually make fun of the far left during the last election and with them wanting to go to Canada and crying, but the far right are doing that now. I keep seeing trump supports now wanting to move to Mexico cause of this election (the irony of wanting a wall).
It's not conservatives but the West itself that's grown weak and decadent. All civilizations eventually succumb to entropy and collapse.
At no point in human history have things ever remained static forever, you've got to learn to roll with the changes, that's just the way it is.
And you've got be willing to call it as it is, subscribing to either a left/right view on everything is inevitably going to lead to you being wrong because reality just isn't that simple as to fit neatly into a left/right narrative all of the time.
lol, it's the subtle tyranny of democracy. Democracy grants people the illusion that they're actually getting their wills enforced, but in reality, just becomes an ever-tightening noose around the necks of people it purportedly represents. All the people running democracy from the shadows have to do is give a fraction of what the people want when they are outraged, and they will be completely satisfied despite the fact that the absence of what they had will soon become the new normal and they'll never get it back. It's like playing a dollar slot machine which has the max payout of a dollar, but you've been told the max payout is a million dollars. No rational person would keep playing if they knew that the best they could do was to break even, but if they don't know they'll eventually become addicted and keep playing until they're broke.
Lol, I still can't get over the fact that Fuentes is that much of a faggot.
Believe me, I wasn't referencing a specific person.
They're either milquetoast and weak, or they're a bunch of evil murderous Nazi bigots.
Make up your mind lefties!!!!!
Make up your mind lefties!!!!!
No, they're just liberals with a Christian aesthetic and liberalism is basically impotent as an ideology.
Troonologist PhD
kiwifarms.net
Rootless cosmopolitan elites co-opted liberalism, “progress,” and working class issues. A nation can be sort of liberal as long they gatekeep the shit out of who gets to be in the nation.
To answer OP I think it’s because conservatives are simply too nice. Even most of the far right don’t actually want to kill and hurt people. Far leftist thugs are sadistic, murderous, monsters despite them being retardedly bad at violence.
Skin and Bones
kiwifarms.net
They could go all teeth barred and out swinging, but make so make so many enemies they have to win and keep winning or else. Or they could take their lumps and do nothing but collect a paycheck.
National liberalism doesn't work because liberalism means people are going to deconstruct why they do that and they'll just stop doing that.
Troonologist PhD
kiwifarms.net
I mean something akin to the classical liberalism that’s been around for centuries. The deconstructionists/destructionists is an example of who the nation will have to gatekeep out. It won’t work forever but the rise and fall of civilizations is inevitable.
Similar threads
Aka me being mad on the internet
