Why are shows so reluctant for sexiness (Besides Stupid Jobless Whiners?) -

[8777BB5]

So YouTube's been spamming their stupid new show Rules for Best Friends. One of the rules involves a girl ripping her pants so her friend sees her underwear. The thing that got me about this was that the girl was wearing boring plain white panties. Normally when you go for a split pants joke you either A) have the person wear embarrassing underwear, B) have the person wear sexy underwear or C) you have person wear no underwear so we all get a view of their naked butt. If you just have them wearing plain boring underwear no one finds it funny because plain boring underwear by itself is not funny.

This isn't the first time I've noticed adult shows going for extremely G Rated sexiness. I've noticed that this year the TV commercials that involve beaches feature people dressed like it's early fall, with some even going as far as having people wear jackets and long sleeve shirts and khaki pants. The few that are in swimsuits are either wearing a wet/dry (Black mesh shirt that Scuba Divers and surfers wear) or are wearing a T-Shirt over it and to make sure no one gets any enjoyment from that, the a guys are skinnyfats and the girls are flat chested to the point they could probably get away with going topless. Even commercials that aren't set at beaches are having characters wearing long sleeve shirts/jackets and pants. If this was the southern hemisphere I wouldn't be worried about it but it seems bizarre that a Northern hemisphere summer commercial would feature people wearing fall/winter clothes.

I really don't know why we can't have sexiness in the year 2018. Sure SJWs are the obvious answer but it really seems this year it's been stepped up. I really wish we could go back to the days when people could wear swimtrunks and bikinis on the beach and you could have sexy jokes without having to G rate them

 

[Graffiti canvas]

It has nothing to do with SJW's and everything to do with people outraged in the name of either "god" or "the children"

The only people who complain to places about sexualized content online or on TV are religious wackos or mothers who have made their entire life identity revolve around changing the world to preserve their 7yr old kids innocence/ignorance rather than police the content the kid has access to.

The USA is a laughing stock of the world when it comes to sexuality. Muslim countries outright ban it, EU countries are fine with boobs n shit in commercials.

Only the US freaks the fuck out about a woman's nipple whilst not batting an eye watching someone get shot multiple times and blood and guts spilling everywhere.

 

[Y2K Baby]

The thing that got me about this was that the girl was wearing boring plain white panties.

She should have had skid marks, haha.

 

[Rand /pol/]

If you want sexual stuff there's already media for it, it doesn't make much sense to put sexual stuff in places where it wouldnt really fit.

 

[Slap47]

It has nothing to do with SJW's and everything to do with people outraged in the name of either "god" or "the children"

The only people who complain to places about sexualized content online or on TV are religious wackos or mothers who have made their entire life identity revolve around changing the world to preserve their 7yr old kids innocence/ignorance rather than police the content the kid has access to.

The USA is a laughing stock of the world when it comes to sexuality. Muslim countries outright ban it, EU countries are fine with boobs n shit in commercials.

Only the US freaks the fuck out about a woman's nipple whilst not batting an eye watching someone get shot multiple times and blood and guts spilling everywhere.

The Christian Right is the laughing stock of the western world. The only times they can get things censored is when they have sjws on their side.

Sure there is a small sect of sex-positive feminists but the vast majority are sex negative. Most that say they're sex positive are actually sex negative.

Europe doesn't have the puritanical roots of the USA but they have all of the laws to allow new ideas to create censorship. The USA has those roots but a system that enables freedom to prevail.

 

[IV 445]

Have you seen rap or music videos? It’s porn with music.

 

[MemeGray]

Something something male gaze, something something patriarchy.

 

[Rand /pol/]

Only the US freaks the fuck out about a woman's nipple whilst not batting an eye watching someone get shot multiple times and blood and guts spilling everywhere.

Japanese law requires genitals in porn to be censored, we're far from the most censor happy country.

 

[The Shadow]

The Christian Right is the laughing stock of the western world. The only times they can get things censored is when they have sjws on their side.

Sure there is a small sect of sex-positive feminists but the vast majority are sex negative. Most that say they're sex positive are actually sex negative.

Europe doesn't have the puritanical roots of the USA but they have all of the laws to allow new ideas to create censorship. The USA has those roots but a system that enables freedom to prevail.

The USA's "puritanical roots" are pretty massively overstated by most people. A couple of the original colonies were religious minded, but most were economic and agricultural projects.

There is always a finger wagging schoolmarm that wants to shake their finger about something, and most people just don't want to stir the pot or listen to people bitch, they just want to go about their business.

One reason I disagree with those that tell me we're in a golden age of television is the overabundance of sex scenes. On the contrary to the OP, it seems like lots of shows just have sex scenes to have them. Just because you can show people fucking doesn't mean you need to. It's pretty boring to watch and typically just serves as filler that doesn't move the story forward. If I wanted porn that's freely available.

I feel like people wanting sex and nudity in their entertainment is in most cases inversely proportional to how much they're getting in real life.

 

[Lunete]

I've noticed that this year the TV commercials that involve beaches feature people dressed like it's early fall, with some even going as far as having people wear jackets and long sleeve shirts and khaki pants. The few that are in swimsuits are either wearing a wet/dry (Black mesh shirt that Scuba Divers and surfers wear) or are wearing a T-Shirt over it and to make sure no one gets any enjoyment from that, the a guys are skinnyfats and the girls are flat chested to the point they could probably get away with going topless

You can't have attractive physically fit people in your ads because itsi objectifying and/or body shaming.

 

[BeanBidan]

EU countries are fine with boobs n shit in commercials.

After the caliphate it won't.

 

[millais]

I'm fine with these media conglomerates promoting more people to wear long sleeve and long trouser attire during the summer. If more people would protect their skin against UV exposure, we could significantly reduce rate of melanoma and save the taxpayers millions every year on skin cancer treatments.

 

[The Shadow]

I'm fine with these media conglomerates promoting more people to wear long sleeve and long trouser attire during the summer. If more people would protect their skin against UV exposure, we could significantly reduce rate of melanoma and save the taxpayers millions every year on skin cancer treatments.

Plus, it's a good way to backdoor getting fatties to not wear bikinis and such.

 

[Hatoful Dandy]