Why are so many elites also pedophiles? Especially in (((Hollywood))).
Why are so many elites also pedophiles? -
- Thread starter Trapitalism
- Start date
-
Sustained Denial of Service attacks. Paid for botnet. Service will continue to be disrupted until I can contact other providers and arrange a fix.
because they like politics for some reason
In a world where connections and media attention get you much further than actual talent, if someone with a moderate amount of influence wanted to increase their influence over those in positions of power what would be easier: Digging up blackmail on someone who already lucked their way into fame or power, or finding a pedophile and making them famous/powerful. Pedos are the easiest to control and no one will care to listen if they claim they are being blackmailed by someone who gave them access to children.
Atleast thats how the schizo theory goes.
Atleast thats how the schizo theory goes.
Other pedos are just more low-key.
The creepy uncle masturbating to his niece won't create Epstein like scandals or pizzagate style conspiracies.
Most children get sexually abused by someone close to its family, not some weirdo in Hollywood.
The creepy uncle masturbating to his niece won't create Epstein like scandals or pizzagate style conspiracies.
Most children get sexually abused by someone close to its family, not some weirdo in Hollywood.
Well I think it's pretty obvious to most that those who obtain power tend to be those who crave power.
Starting from there: it's worth noting that these pedo-elites don't tend to be your run-of-the-mill "young love" pedos, but actually predatory fucks. They don't think on the lines of "love comes at all ages." They want to enslave people who literally cannot even attempt to fight back with any modicum of success. It's the ultimate power trip. You could teach them that it's totally okay to suck a grown man's cock and punish them for expressing ideas to the contrary. You can tie them up in a helpless position and not be remotely phased by their kicks and scratches. You can force a child to literally eat your shit while you fuck them in the ass and they could do nothing about it.
Well most people couldn't. But that's because most people aren't fucking psychos. Those that crave power and influence to the extent that they work effortlessly to obtain said stature... I think you get the rest of everything I could say on the issue.
Starting from there: it's worth noting that these pedo-elites don't tend to be your run-of-the-mill "young love" pedos, but actually predatory fucks. They don't think on the lines of "love comes at all ages." They want to enslave people who literally cannot even attempt to fight back with any modicum of success. It's the ultimate power trip. You could teach them that it's totally okay to suck a grown man's cock and punish them for expressing ideas to the contrary. You can tie them up in a helpless position and not be remotely phased by their kicks and scratches. You can force a child to literally eat your shit while you fuck them in the ass and they could do nothing about it.
Well most people couldn't. But that's because most people aren't fucking psychos. Those that crave power and influence to the extent that they work effortlessly to obtain said stature... I think you get the rest of everything I could say on the issue.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Highlight
- #6
For the same reason that heavy drug users will always seek a stronger dose - when you have everything you want, then you constantly need to seek stronger, more extreme thrills.
Overly Serious
kiwifarms.net
1. Weak predators disguise themselves. They virtue signal far more than the actually virtuous.
2. Weak predators for cliques and support each other. Cults and gangs often use a shared crime as a bonding / loyalty technique.
3. It may be there is a personality-type link between those who get off on sexual exploitation of the easily manipulated and those who like to manipulate others generally.
4. Paedophilia provides an exploitable hold over people if you can lure someone into it. Witness Eptstein working high society to draw people in and bait them with teenage girls who are old enough to look (or be made to look) sexual but young enough to provide blackmail hold over the target. And if that proves a gateway to draw someone into even younger victims, that provides an even greater hold.
2. Weak predators for cliques and support each other. Cults and gangs often use a shared crime as a bonding / loyalty technique.
3. It may be there is a personality-type link between those who get off on sexual exploitation of the easily manipulated and those who like to manipulate others generally.
4. Paedophilia provides an exploitable hold over people if you can lure someone into it. Witness Eptstein working high society to draw people in and bait them with teenage girls who are old enough to look (or be made to look) sexual but young enough to provide blackmail hold over the target. And if that proves a gateway to draw someone into even younger victims, that provides an even greater hold.
Brahma
kiwifarms.net
Ennui, hedonic adaption?
That's what I've always assumed. If I had say white women on tap, could fuck 10/10s at the drop of a hat, or at least with little effort, I'd probably start craving blacks or Asians or whatever. Once they're available on tap too, but they're all sloots who've slurped their way into fame or whatever, then maybe I'll start craving someone who doesn't have a bodycount of 100+ etc.
Few years of that, next thing you know you're raping kids. Or troons. Or amputees. Fucking anything out of the ordinary because you're "bored" with normal
That's what I've always assumed. If I had say white women on tap, could fuck 10/10s at the drop of a hat, or at least with little effort, I'd probably start craving blacks or Asians or whatever. Once they're available on tap too, but they're all sloots who've slurped their way into fame or whatever, then maybe I'll start craving someone who doesn't have a bodycount of 100+ etc.
Few years of that, next thing you know you're raping kids. Or troons. Or amputees. Fucking anything out of the ordinary because you're "bored" with normal
Kids are an expensive delicacy, even if they're "not pedos" this "lovely" celebrities everyone loves so much will gladly taste some because they can and they don't know what else do with their money and influence.
I don’t think its true that the elite has a higher incidence of paedophilia than those in the lower quarters, just that because of their power they can get away with it for far longer. Obviously power allows them that ability.
I do think they cause far more damage however. Old Jeff, with his billions and shady connections was able to rape so many young girls because his wealth and power gave him such a high level of access and freedom for such a long amount of time that he was able to destroy more young people as a result. Compare to some poor fucker, s/he will only have those around him under his area of control, which is why its often people they know sadly. Jimmy Saville appears to have raped and molested upward of a 1000 victims up and down the country, down to this connections (like Prince Charles). Same as the Catholic Church, they were protected by a very powerful institute, thus they were able to do more damage.
I do think they cause far more damage however. Old Jeff, with his billions and shady connections was able to rape so many young girls because his wealth and power gave him such a high level of access and freedom for such a long amount of time that he was able to destroy more young people as a result. Compare to some poor fucker, s/he will only have those around him under his area of control, which is why its often people they know sadly. Jimmy Saville appears to have raped and molested upward of a 1000 victims up and down the country, down to this connections (like Prince Charles). Same as the Catholic Church, they were protected by a very powerful institute, thus they were able to do more damage.
Anything you can easily get becomes normal and eventually boring.
Sex is the same, in the '80's it was dudes trying to get their wives to do anal, now it's poly "relationships" and cucking.
The wealthy were doing poly and cucking in the '80's.
The immature impulse is to always go for the taboo because of the added thrill.
There's a reason teaching children about freak shit in sex-ed is a bad idea other than the thoughtless "puritan" smear 'bigbrained' fedora tippers use.
Sex is the same, in the '80's it was dudes trying to get their wives to do anal, now it's poly "relationships" and cucking.
The wealthy were doing poly and cucking in the '80's.
The immature impulse is to always go for the taboo because of the added thrill.
There's a reason teaching children about freak shit in sex-ed is a bad idea other than the thoughtless "puritan" smear 'bigbrained' fedora tippers use.
Crazedking
kiwifarms.net
13-16 y/o girl used to be the standard to bear children in ye olde time. That people are attracted to girl that age is sadly "normal" but disgusting. OF course modern medical knowledge we now know that a few more years gives better odds in term of childbearing and also give times for women to have better informed consent and control over their lives instead of just being forced into tribal marriage so neighboring villagers dont kill each other over petty shite.
If youre a prepubescent child fuckers then you are just a fucking degenerate that needs to be killled, something is def wired wrong. Atleast there is some logical consistency to the natural attraction of young teenage girls.
As for why rich people? bigger story when its big important peoples, theres many pedophile everywhere. You just dont hear about it when its local uncle joe diddling their niece in bumfuck nowhere.
If youre a prepubescent child fuckers then you are just a fucking degenerate that needs to be killled, something is def wired wrong. Atleast there is some logical consistency to the natural attraction of young teenage girls.
As for why rich people? bigger story when its big important peoples, theres many pedophile everywhere. You just dont hear about it when its local uncle joe diddling their niece in bumfuck nowhere.
Perhaps it's ex-elite but Far as Catholic church goes my theory is it's a self inflicted pathology thanks to priests being forbidden from getting married which resulted in a lot of sex pests/gays/pedos/etc. becoming a priest as an easy way out of having "Why aren't you married yet Jimmy?" conversations with their families, do keep in mind most of those priest pervs would have been screwed if they came out decades ago, it shielded them and gave them an excuse, free money, as well as access to easy, gullible prey.
Far as Rich Elite goes, I can only imagine it's a result of being able to own everything and do everyone within the confines of "Consenting Adults Doing Things" and getting bored with it, so they go for the illegal things, the forbidden fruits, the added thrill. There is plenty of stories of rich people doing questionable, illegal or outright fucked up things just because "Fuck it, why not"
Far as Rich Elite goes, I can only imagine it's a result of being able to own everything and do everyone within the confines of "Consenting Adults Doing Things" and getting bored with it, so they go for the illegal things, the forbidden fruits, the added thrill. There is plenty of stories of rich people doing questionable, illegal or outright fucked up things just because "Fuck it, why not"
Imagine a political office is open. Say president of France or mayor of New York. Lots of fingers in lots of pies. In the cutthroat world of politics, who would you sponsor if you were powerful enough to have more power than anyone else to influence who wins (even if that power isn't 100%)?
Would you sponsor someone who shares your ideals? (laughable)
Would you give it as a favor and hope that they're loyal to you?
Would you entrust it someone who seemed to have been loyal for the last 5 years?
Or would you place a Macron or Clinton type guy, a guy fully in the pocket with more secrets and enough Epstein type blackmail against them to make it impossible to operate independantly from you and if they ever do, even if you release just a little you can take away all their power?
Pedophiles make good stooges. And much like criminal organizations, if you're not dirty, they can't trust you. If they don't have blackmail on you, they can't control you.
As for priests, besides the reason @Tovarisz has given, also note that once organisations become corrupted, working there will disgust non-corrupted people (or end up corrupting them too).
I think there may be some pressure where having everything might lead someone to want things that are illegal to have, as wanting to experience the naked evidence of their own power. But I think the other relation is stronger; that being corrupt and dirty is part of what helps people rise (to live a kind of gilded cage life).
Would you sponsor someone who shares your ideals? (laughable)
Would you give it as a favor and hope that they're loyal to you?
Would you entrust it someone who seemed to have been loyal for the last 5 years?
Or would you place a Macron or Clinton type guy, a guy fully in the pocket with more secrets and enough Epstein type blackmail against them to make it impossible to operate independantly from you and if they ever do, even if you release just a little you can take away all their power?
Pedophiles make good stooges. And much like criminal organizations, if you're not dirty, they can't trust you. If they don't have blackmail on you, they can't control you.
As for priests, besides the reason @Tovarisz has given, also note that once organisations become corrupted, working there will disgust non-corrupted people (or end up corrupting them too).
I think there may be some pressure where having everything might lead someone to want things that are illegal to have, as wanting to experience the naked evidence of their own power. But I think the other relation is stronger; that being corrupt and dirty is part of what helps people rise (to live a kind of gilded cage life).
RejectedLynx
kiwifarms.net
While I agree with a lot of what's said here - the main thing in my opinion is there's more eyes on the elite. Sure, you hear of the occasional case that reached national level with some bumfuck pedo-shuffle, but that doesn't mean that someone personally will know of it a few states over. When there's not a lot of eyes, the family and piece of shit get little airtime outside of the people of "whom it may concern" or local tv. When you're an elite, or have a lot of money, your footprint is much bigger. We turn our eyes to the elite of any kind - as if they're any different than any other bottom feeder piece of shit. It's not really surprising that we feel more disgust towards them because they have been given a title in some manner and we paid attention to them.
Really, it's all about perception in the end, I don't think the elite have more egregious tales than someone else at least in the sense of they're not any different than any other scumbag.
The answer is to van them - all of them.
Really, it's all about perception in the end, I don't think the elite have more egregious tales than someone else at least in the sense of they're not any different than any other scumbag.
The answer is to van them - all of them.
The DoJ found in 2006 that public school teachers are 100 times more likely to diddle kids than priests, so it's not vows of celibacy. If anything, there a significant number of hippie sex pests who joined the seminary (ugh, the Church's name for priest school did not age well) in the 1960's to dodge the 'Nam draft, coupled with the sexual revolution and the hijacking of Vatican II by liberals. This hypothesis is supported by thr fact that the cases of reported priest misconduct spiked in the '70s and '80s.
Furthermore, there were bishops who shuffled around the offending priests, and at that time it was widely believed that pedos could be "cured" with therapy.
At the end of the day: yeah, as a practicing Catholic, I acknowledge that the abuse scandal was severe. But like teachers or coaches, the nonces in collars did so because they had positions of power where they wouldn't be questioned, and were abetted by a lack of accountability.
Unpaid Emotional Labourer
I’m Diana Moon Glampers. Let’s talk about equity.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Yes, someone gets it.
The true ultra elite, of which there are but a handful, may or may not be pedos.
But the rung that contains politicians and other prominent people who seem rich and powerful to you and me but are far far FAR beneath the true elite don’t just happen to be pedos. They are selected because they are pedos. Or killed somebody and the elite covered it up. Or killed a kid. Or thinks they’ve killed a kid and thinks the elite covered it up. Or anything horrible, really. Anything that the elite can leverage for control.
An honest honorable person cannot be controlled. When they find one of those accidentally succeeding they entrap him or they entrap his sons. Same with women. Thing is, you send a 12-yo child to a female politician’s hotel room and she’s going to walk the kid down to the front desk to find out where her mom is. But you send that same child to her garbage husband’s room, or her garbage son’s room...and they might bite. And then you have her. Female politicians are almost always controlled by threats to expose the crimes of male family members. A few are simply truly so greedy and power hungry that they can be controlled by rewards alone, but that still isn’t safe for the elite. Only the combination of carrot and stick makes them feel confident.
The nam excuse doesn't fly in Europe though. The sexual revolution also largely removed a lot of stigma and taboo around sex so it makes sense that a lot of people started to speak about being abused and/or some abusers got too cocky.
Personally I was never practicing and the continuing scandals made sure I won't give two shits about the church unless they man up and give all offending priests along with evidence of misconduct that they do have up for police and trial or lynchings instead of hiding it and shuffling offenders around like fucking pussies which just makes me think they're all doing it because it looks like a giant circle jerk where they all cover one another's ass whenever possible, that organisation is rotten to it's core, luckily it's bleeding followers and will be a dead religion by the end of the century.
And well... of course most pedos go for teaching, it's no secret they want to be employed in positions with access to kids, I bet most of them are teachers or in the school system in some way or another
The church cover up was unacceptable for an organization that mandates confession of sin.
Completely ignoring the fact the priests using the church harmed children to the point an unknown number left religion entirely, and died in sin is unacceptable.
Not excommunicating the abusers is evil.
The Roman Catholic Church is stained by evil done in its name by its own priests.
"By their fruits you will know them."
Similar threads
