Why is nearly half the world a garbage can?

Longjack Attack

Exuberant.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
It seems that everywhere but the United States, parts of Europe, Canada and some are nothing but garbage. Drug cartels are pretty much the new set of government all throughout Mexico and South America due to socialist policies; Middle eastern countries have the most degrading aspects of islamic religion ingrained within every aspect of their lifestyle (i.e Sharia Law, religious vigilantism, hatred of the west, degradation of women etc.); the Chinese don't know how follow the most basic human health protocols which is killing most of its citizens; UK, and Germany are putting people in jail for wrongthink along with mass migration and Africa's underdeveloped state in which other countries have to step in and have to save it. I know the United States and Canada aren't perfect, but at least their chaos is controlled in a way compared to these other countries.

How did all of these issues come to be? Do these areas of the world even have the ability to salvage themselves or will they further devolve into destruction?
 

Stephanie Bustcakes

But... The future refused to change.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
200 years ago 100% of the world was a garbage can. Then the westernized world discovered germ theory and people started to wash their hands and bathe more than once a month. Now it's gone down to only 50%, with places like China and India still stuck in witch doctor mindsets. The Chinese hunt species to extinction for traditional medicine which doesn't work. The Hindus believe the Ganges river is incorruptible, which means they think no matter how many feces and corpses they throw into it it'll always be clean. The world not being a complete and total garbage can is a relatively new phenomenon.
 

crocodilian

K. K. K.an't Edit Posts
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Because about 97% of all confirmed strides made in science and the arts for the past six-hundred years can be traced to a pocket in Europe.

Some places outside of Europe aren't totally hopeless (Japan, the non-Chinese parts of China, Worst Korea) but for the most part you're looking at Afghanistan, any generic African nation, Mexico and India: dumb, brown hovels that function on caste systems, criminal networks and the discarded garbage of the west. If the human race didn't have whites accomplishing things, we would be no better off than chimpanzees.
 

WeWuzFinns

Chris is king! Judas Moon Canto XXXIV
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Awareness prevents tyranny. In the non-civilized countries, the people running the show can get away with more. Still people could be more aware and hold politicians responsible for their actions with deterrent of force, what the second amendment was designed to do.
 

crocodilian

K. K. K.an't Edit Posts
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
It seems like you've never left your country of origin, and you give way too much credence to whatever the 'negative news being shoved down our throats dujour' is. This is a fantastic time to be alive, in general.
*E*- spelling is hard.

It's amazing how quick people forget beheadings posted to Facebook, especially when the victims' own government helps cover it up. And other nations' governments. And most major internet outlets. And the victim's own parents. We forget just how little our lives are valued when placed under the grand lens of globalism, and how quickly our (filmed) misfortune would be covered up to keep the flow of money (and migrants) surging.

What are you doing, bigot? Stop reading and go visit those nations yourselves, you'll see it isn't so bad. It's a fantastic time to be alive, after all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Scratch This Nut

Problematic Chihuahua
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
It's amazing how quick people forget beheadings posted to Facebook, especially when the victims' own government helps cover it up. And other nations' governments. And most major internet outlets. And the victim's own parents. We forget just how little our lives are valued when placed under the grand lens of globalism, and how quickly our (filmed) misfortune would be covered up to keep the flow of money (and migrants) surging.

What are you doing, bigot? Stop reading and go visit those nations yourselves, you'll see it isn't so bad. It's a fantastic time to be alive, after all.
How dare people not want video of a teen girl’s brutal murder to be spread throughout the internet. Jesus fucking Christ.
 

Masta

Faggot
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
It's amazing how quick people forget beheadings posted to Facebook, especially when the victims' own government helps cover it up. And other nations' governments. And most major internet outlets. And the victim's own parents. We forget just how little our lives are valued when placed under the grand lens of globalism, and how quickly our (filmed) misfortune would be covered up to keep the flow of money (and migrants) surging.

What are you doing, bigot? Stop reading and go visit those nations yourselves, you'll see it isn't so bad. It's a fantastic time to be alive, after all.
The worst thing about that video is the quality.
 

Dyn

woman respecter
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Drug cartels are pretty much the new set of government all throughout Mexico and South America

Because white people overthrew the old governments and armed terrorist drug cartels to fight them and then flooded their own ghettos with crack cocaine to support them.

Middle eastern countries have the most degrading aspects of islamic religion ingrained within every aspect of their lifestyle

Because white people overthrew their secular governments and empowered fundamentalist cliques with guns and training so they'd terrorist-bomb other white people they didn't like.

the Chinese don't know how follow the most basic human health protocols which is killing most of its citizens

Because white people literally fought a war to force China into allowing us to flood their collapsing society with highly addictive drugs we already banned white people from taking.

Africa's underdeveloped state in which other countries have to step in and have to save it

Does it even need to be said? White people ruined Africa in literally every way it's possible to ruin a place and then flew home with all the mineral rights and said "lol why aren't they building Wendy's and Genius Bars yet?"
 

Nephi

IBS were rigged from the start
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 17, 2020
Because human beings are inherently selfish and short-sided, and despite what Randroids may tell you, that's not a desirable thing.
Most first worlders only give a fuck about "shitholes" when they stop supplying oil and rare Earths or when they stop taking their electronic trash.
And most third worlders deserve their misery, they put corrupt leaders into power, they glady accept leaders that steal and put their country deep into debt while they embrace their primitive traditions such as ritual cannibalism, albino hunting, etc...
This is an imperfect world, deal with it, or do as you please and feel miserable about it, I am rando in the internet, not your mom.
 

crocodilian

K. K. K.an't Edit Posts
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Because white people overthrew the old governments and armed terrorist drug cartels to fight them and then flooded their own ghettos with crack cocaine to support them.

Because white people overthrew their secular governments and empowered fundamentalist cliques with guns and training so they'd terrorist-bomb other white people they didn't like.

Because white people literally fought a war to force China into allowing us to flood their collapsing society with highly addictive drugs we already banned white people from taking.

Does it even need to be said? White people ruined Africa in literally every way it's possible to ruin a place and then flew home with all the mineral rights and said "lol why aren't they building Wendy's and Genius Bars yet?"

There's a lot I could focus on here — such as the fact that latinos and the Chinese were organized and selling drugs in their own land long before whites arrived — but I'm going to lecture you on Africa because it's probably the single most concrete piece of evidence you could find concerning the argument that, even if you helped these people, they would be perpetual failures for entirely inherent reasons.

The history of white and African interaction begins with missionaries, who explored faraway jungles (often without proper training or equipment) on a quest to spread the word of their God, even if it meant they died in the process. At best they would contract translators (who were native) and porters (who were native), finding isolated tribes and essentially offering gifts to anyone who was willing to accept them, hear their gospel (generally some branch of Christianity) and not kill them. This had a success rate of maybe 25% at best, but that was good enough in the eyes of Jesus.

In places where the missionaries weren't killed or turned away, soldiers arrived. The simple fact that an unarmed pacifist ventured into some foreign region and came back alive was all the evidence European governments needed to decide they'll erect a presence there. Why? Because Africa is a treasure trove of natural resources, and always has been because native Africans are too dumb to make use of any of it. It also pays to control, for example, a vital river entry into some region (since you can't trade those resources if you can't securely move them.)

This is largely where stories of "European aggression" stem from. While it's pretty easily-verified most Europeans wanted to civilize Africa rather than abuse them, often through religious conversion, and the Europeans were prone to requesting presence in Africa rather than overtly seizing it (because who wants hostile natives potentially disrupting your supply chain?), some bad apples ruined the bunch. Belgium's actions in the Congo were among the most senselessly brutal and, despite being an outlier in that otherwise amiable and prosperous period of history, it remains the most frequently-cited instance of European mistreating the poor natives. It's the most frequently-cited anything concerning European presence in that time period, really, because cuckolded whites love self-flagellating for shit they had no part in.

After that period of time, when the whites all returned home to pick on the (now twice-defeated) Germany, Africa devolved back into the same shit hole it was prior. Despite making a fair deal of money and erecting (what was now essentially free) infrastructure, they did nothing substantial with it. Brief power struggles in the absence of scary white men led to new regimes, virtually all of whom were violent warlords, and thus the leftover guns, forts, supplies and resources were seized by selfish, short-sighted people. This remains true even to this day because — and I can't stress this enough, — native Africans are stupid and worthless. They have always been stupid and worthless.

Saying "white people ruined Africa" when they introduced totally foreign concepts such as schools, churches, markets, cities and so on is incredibly retarded. You can't even argue whites are responsible for the thing Africa's seemingly most-closely associated with, slave trade, because it was widespread prior to their arrival and remains widespread long after they've left.
 

Dyn

woman respecter
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
There's a lot I could focus on here — such as the fact that latinos and the Chinese were organized and selling drugs in their own land long before whites arrived — but I'm going to lecture you on Africa because it's probably the single most concrete piece of evidence you could find concerning the argument that, even if you helped these people, they would be perpetual failures for entirely inherent reasons.

The history of white and African interaction begins with missionaries, who explored faraway jungles (often without proper training or equipment) on a quest to spread the word of their God, even if it meant they died in the process. At best they would contract translators (who were native) and porters (who were native), finding isolated tribes and essentially offering gifts to anyone who was willing to accept them, hear their gospel (generally some branch of Christianity) and not kill them. This had a success rate of maybe 25% at best, but that was good enough in the eyes of Jesus.

In places where the missionaries weren't killed or turned away, soldiers arrived. The simple fact that an unarmed pacifist ventured into some foreign region and came back alive was all the evidence European governments needed to decide they'll erect a presence there. Why? Because Africa is a treasure trove of natural resources, and always has been because native Africans are too dumb to make use of any of it. It also pays to control, for example, a vital river entry into some region (since you can't trade those resources if you can't securely move them.)

This is largely where stories of "European aggression" stem from. While it's pretty easily-verified most Europeans wanted to civilize Africa rather than abuse them, often through religious conversion, and the Europeans were prone to requesting presence in Africa rather than overtly seizing it (because who wants hostile natives potentially disrupting your supply chain?), some bad apples ruined the bunch. Belgium's actions in the Congo were among the most senselessly brutal and, despite being an outlier in that otherwise amiable and prosperous period of history, it remains the most frequently-cited instance of European mistreating the poor natives. It's the most frequently-cited anything concerning European presence in that time period, really.

After that period of time, when the whites all returned home to pick on the (now twice-defeated) Germany, Africa devolved back into the same shit hole it was prior. Despite making a fair deal of money and erecting (what was now essentially free) infrastructure, they did nothing substantial with it. Brief power struggles in the absence of scary white men led to new regimes, virtually all of whom were violent warlords, and thus the leftover guns, forts, supplies and resources were seized by selfish, short-sighted people. This remains true even to this day because — and I can't stress this enough, — native Africans are stupid and worthless. They have always been stupid and worthless.

Saying "white people ruined Africa" when they introduced totally foreign concepts such as schools, churches, markets, cities and so on is incredibly retarded. You can't even argue whites are responsible for the thing Africa's seemingly most-closely associated with, slave trade, because it was widespread prior to their arrival and remains widespread long after they've left.

Nobody got time to read that shit type it out again but shorter.