Why is nearly half the world a garbage can?

crocodilian

K. K. K.an't Edit Posts
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
So it's p much exactly what everyone knew you wanted to say when you started defending white oppressors in Africa. Good job paring it down.

I wrote a big, expansive essay (not for you; I know your type, you were never going to read it) because some people genuinely think the white race's impact on the planet is largely negative when it's the exact opposite. Even a layman's glance into human history would (and did) demonstrate just how correct I am. Whites are responsible for the lion's share of human prosperity, not just today but in the distant past.
 

Dyn

woman respecter
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
I wrote a big, expansive essay (not for you; I know your type, you were never going to read it) because some people genuinely think the white race's impact on the planet is largely negative when it's the exact opposite. Even a layman's glance into human history would (and did) demonstrate just how correct I am. Whites are responsible for the lion's share of human prosperity, not just today but in the distant past.

ok racist
 

Terrorist

Osama bin Ladkin
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
1. Read The Bell Curve.
2. A lot of half-decent places kicked out the whites, became communist, or were destabilized by CIA niggers.

There's a lot I could focus on here — such as the fact that latinos and the Chinese were organized and selling drugs in their own land long before whites arrived — but I'm going to lecture you on Africa because it's probably the single most concrete piece of evidence you could find concerning the argument that, even if you helped these people, they would be perpetual failures for entirely inherent reasons.

The history of white and African interaction begins with missionaries, who explored faraway jungles (often without proper training or equipment) on a quest to spread the word of their God, even if it meant they died in the process. At best they would contract translators (who were native) and porters (who were native), finding isolated tribes and essentially offering gifts to anyone who was willing to accept them, hear their gospel (generally some branch of Christianity) and not kill them. This had a success rate of maybe 25% at best, but that was good enough in the eyes of Jesus.

In places where the missionaries weren't killed or turned away, soldiers arrived. The simple fact that an unarmed pacifist ventured into some foreign region and came back alive was all the evidence European governments needed to decide they'll erect a presence there. Why? Because Africa is a treasure trove of natural resources, and always has been because native Africans are too dumb to make use of any of it. It also pays to control, for example, a vital river entry into some region (since you can't trade those resources if you can't securely move them.)

This is largely where stories of "European aggression" stem from. While it's pretty easily-verified most Europeans wanted to civilize Africa rather than abuse them, often through religious conversion, and the Europeans were prone to requesting presence in Africa rather than overtly seizing it (because who wants hostile natives potentially disrupting your supply chain?), some bad apples ruined the bunch. Belgium's actions in the Congo were among the most senselessly brutal and, despite being an outlier in that otherwise amiable and prosperous period of history, it remains the most frequently-cited instance of European mistreating the poor natives. It's the most frequently-cited anything concerning European presence in that time period, really, because cuckolded whites love self-flagellating for shit they had no part in.

After that period of time, when the whites all returned home to pick on the (now twice-defeated) Germany, Africa devolved back into the same shit hole it was prior. Despite making a fair deal of money and erecting (what was now essentially free) infrastructure, they did nothing substantial with it. Brief power struggles in the absence of scary white men led to new regimes, virtually all of whom were violent warlords, and thus the leftover guns, forts, supplies and resources were seized by selfish, short-sighted people. This remains true even to this day because — and I can't stress this enough, — native Africans are stupid and worthless. They have always been stupid and worthless.

Saying "white people ruined Africa" when they introduced totally foreign concepts such as schools, churches, markets, cities and so on is incredibly retarded. You can't even argue whites are responsible for the thing Africa's seemingly most-closely associated with, slave trade, because it was widespread prior to their arrival and remains widespread long after they've left.

White people kind of did ruin Africa though. They gave their colonies complex euro-style societies which the 70-IQ nigger brain can't understand or maintain, so the whole thing was bound to collapse once they left.

Blacks would be far better off if they stayed hunting and gathering in the jungle, since that is a level of functioning they can handle and does not require whitey to pour absurd amounts of resources into it to sustain it.
 

Calandrino

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
The confirmation bias is strong here: "The culture I was brought up in is the best, ergo any deviation from it is sub-par."
Illiterate people with no internet access are free to chime in whenever

Because white people literally fought a war to force China into allowing us to flood their collapsing society with highly addictive drugs we already banned white people from taking.
Even while Brits were killing the Chinese 100:1 with their magic boomsticks, the Chinese establishment mostly still dismissed western science and technology as irrelevant foreign barbarian devil nonsense. China was going to persist in being a dystopian hell regardless, but thanks to colonial oppression, they're at least a dystopian hell with electricity. Thanks for algebra and kites I guess.
 

Slap47

Hehe xd
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
You gotta credit the Protestant work ethic and liberal reformers.

They insisted that everybody learn reading, writing and arithmetic so that they could better service god. They made hard work not just a duty but something to take pride in. Their hard ways were tempered by the idea that they existed to serve a larger society.
 

Webby's Boyfriend

reality cartoonist
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 18, 2018
TLDR; MURICA, FUCK YEAH!



You forgot Australia and New Zealand, OP.

e10.png
 
Last edited:

Jarolleon

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 23, 2019
1. Read The Bell Curve.
2. A lot of half-decent places kicked out the whites, became communist, or were destabilized by CIA niggers.



White people kind of did ruin Africa though. They gave their colonies complex euro-style societies which the 70-IQ nigger brain can't understand or maintain, so the whole thing was bound to collapse once they left.

Blacks would be far better off if they stayed hunting and gathering in the jungle, since that is a level of functioning they can handle and does not require whitey to pour absurd amounts of resources into it to sustain it.
So Joseph Conrad was right?
 

Travis Touchdown Cumsock

What an absolute travesty.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Probably because most humans lack self-awareness of how their actions impact those around them, including and especially gross ones. Multiply one asshole by 7.7 billion and you have a recipe for Planet Dumpster.
 

Feline Supremacist

I am a Dog-Exclusionary Radical Felinist
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 16, 2019
What city? Tijuana? Mexico City?
Mexico City proper is fairly civilized, the further out in the city you go the worse it gets. There's towns like Guanajuato, Leon and Queretaro but Mexico isn't a country to hicthike around while backpacking. Border towns are not even worth discussing.
 

LatinasAreTheFuture

Supreme Leader of Greater Muttistan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 24, 2019
Mexico City proper is fairly civilized, the further out in the city you go the worse it gets. There's towns like Guanajuato, Leon and Queretaro but Mexico isn't a country to hicthike around while backpacking. Border towns are not even worth discussing.
If you were taking advice from me, I’d just say not to go. Especially if you are white.