Why shouldn't the electoral college be abolished? -


To live a lie, or die in a dream?
A person is part of minority group because of the circumstances of their birth? Nah, they don't need extra protections or privileges. A person is a minority because of a choice they voluntarily made? Hurr they need to get dicksucked and have everyone else get fucked over.
Involuntary minorities will continue to exist regardless of their circumstances. Meanwhile farmers, Nazis, and married couples wouldn't if they didn't have have protections or privileges (EC for the first, 1st amendment for the second, tax breaks for the third). People will not voluntarily choose to be a minority in anything unless there are perks associated with it— and diversity (of thought and action) does have actual merit, hence why no equity.

Cynically Insane

Without an electoral college you end up like Canada. First past the polls is exceptional and anyone thinks otherwise is also exceptional.
The only time first past the post is bad is when there are more than 2 options. In Canada it is particularly bad because there are at least 3 major parties and no elected head of state. There is no way to have a house and leader from different parties because the leader of the house is the leader of the party with the most seats.

Justin Trudeau got elected on his promise to institute electoral change, arguing for a ranked ballot. The ideal situation in a parliamentary system. However, just a few weeks into his reign he stated that Canadians no longer felt that electoral reform is important. I am laughing now because with an election coming he would have fared far better with a ranked ballot. He will likely be re-elected anyway though because the conservatives are running a bowl of cold oatmeal and the NDP a corrupt towel head. There are no better options as a spokesperson for the country. Ideally Canadians should be able to vote for their MP (local rep in the house) and the PM. That would create a government far more reflective of the people. But it would again require major constitutional changes that all parties would attempt to exploit to further their own agenda instead of standing up for the citizenry. Same shit, different system.
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Apoth42


Welcome home
Sweden and Germany are more developed than the US.
It depends on whether you compare the aggregate or the most developed parts.

Besides, they're standing on the shoulders of giants while not having built the shoulders that their kids can stand on; to think about it, they don't have the kids either, but that's another issue.
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Lurkio and Apoth42

ProgKing of the North

I think it's very close, but iirc the electoral college adds at least 2 extra points per state over what the actual congressional district number is. It's supposed to serve as some kind of happy medium between number of senators (2 per state) and number of representatives (1 per district, number of districts being dictated by population numbers in the census), I think. As a result, states that choose to split are left with extra points that kind of serve as a strange abstract.
The extra points (the two votes representing the senate) go to the statewide winner

For example in 2008, McCain won Nebraska, which has 3 districts and 5 votes, but Obama won the 2nd district (Omaha and, at the time, some older parts of Bellevue) so McCain won 4 votes and Obama 1.

So of course in 2010 the state republicans managed to move the nonOmaha parts of the second district to the newer, richer, whiter suburbs of LaVista and Papillion, but that’s a separate issue.
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Apoth42 and Golly


Hehe xd
Against EC

-The system of picking electors is actually exceptional. They sometimes just change their mind and vote for whatever they want.

-The electoral college was created when the USA could best be described as an "aristocratic republic". The idea was that groups would pick a friend with shared interests to represent them (Think cliques of Virginian planters or businessmen in Boston). Instead of focusing on politics they would leave that to their one friend and get back to work. Now this system is designed to represent millions of common people and nowadays people are able to just vote on candidates themselves thanks to modern technology. Its still the case now but back then the politics was more about regional differences and interests and the EC did that job well. People don't really need to pick electors anymore.

-The electoral college discourages people from voting as there is basically no reason to vote if you live in a state with a dominant party. Millions of red Californians and blue Texans voting would be a good thing. The big meme is that "Hillary won the popular vote" but we don't know how people would vote with a different system.

-The electoral college is overly complicated and discourages voter participation. Learning politics should mean learning about issues, not understanding a strange system.

-The electoral college prevents the coasts from dominating the country. Perhaps the cities should have more power if they have more people?

-Its ok to change these institutions, the vice president used to be the guy from the losing party (Lmao).

-The electoral college plays a part in the USA not having parties that can actually represent the people. Parties become bureaucratic morasses that exist to serve their own interests that survive based on the "lesser evil" idea.

Pro EC

+The electoral college prevents the coasts from dominating the country. This prevents the cities from looting the countryside. You see this in many African and European countries where wealth is concentrated in an extremely densely populated core while the rest of the country is neglected. The Congo and Cosmopolitan France display this best. I would also that this is the case with Canada and her western provinces (as the Canadian senate is basically a rubber stamp).

+The electoral college was created by the founders... I guess Americans would call that a pro. I don't think so do the aforementioned "aristocratic republic" thing I discussed earlier.

+The rural backbone of the country is given alot of representation.

+It prevents extremist parties from taking power by ensuring the dominance of two largely inoffensive parties.

+The system is excellent for expanding countries as new states are joining a country rather than becoming slaves to a faraway populated core.

My Opinion:

I think reform is possible. The system of actually having electors is dumb but the principle of each state getting fair representation is a hard issue to tackle.

In Canada where the senate is irrelevant you have a setup where the rural provinces subsidize an ever degenerating urban core in the east. This tyranny of the majority is not obvious as the Harper Government (2006-2015) was based in rural Alberta but through those years the west subsidized the east through annual equalization payments.


The USA has similar programs but its less tyranny of the majority and more of a system where both dogshit cities and rural hellscapes get free money to burn on nothing.


Idolm@ster has all my big tiddy waifus
Because fuck niggers and Californians.
"fly over states" and most small towns we get our produce from are important.

Daddy Dongle Dinkle

ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็=^_^=ก้้้้้้้้้้้ KhaJiit rave!
Because what's good for California is not good for anyone else in the country, and frequently not good for California to boot.
California needs to be fucking bombed from orbit. That hell-hole is democratic cancer, that's almost uncurable. When I think of California, it literally makes me vomit.


Trendy hipsters are fleeing California and setting up estates in the midwest. This cancer will kill you no matter what you do.
This is what I'm saying. I don't care if it gets abolished and I find it funny when both sides bicker over it. Nothing will change either way. Nothing ever really changes.


Takin' all the pretty girls.
Abolishing the EC might not work out as well as some think it would. I know quite a few people here in CA that don't bother voting because it's a waste of time for them. Turn it into a straight-up national popular vote, and a lot of people who never bothered voting because their votes didn't count in a Democrat stronghold are going to show up to the polls. Obviously I don't know exactly how many people that would be, or if it would be enough to make a difference, but it's something worth thinking about.


I can think of reasons both to keep and abolish it. The core of the issue is that democracy is inherently flawed, especially when you have too many different groups of people with different conflicting interests. Imagine hypothetically what would happen if the world suddenly became one huge democracy and we all had to make decisions based on the whims of the entire population of China and India.

Papa Adolfo's Take'n'Bake

It's screamin' good.
The federal government was never meant to be a centralized political tool used to priotize the agenda of one population over another. If you want to exert your agenda to deal with your local issues, use your municipal or state government. You have no right to inflict your will on the entirety of the nation, especially one that was designed to prevent the tyranny of the masses.


Rubbing hand intensifies
...and the US doesn't have tons of serious problems that need to be addressed?
Like homeless problem in San Francisco which the brainlet governer in Cali just excerbates the problem by bringing in more illegal immigrants and overcrowd the state impossible to provide the housing to all the residents and sustain the healthy economy.

About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

BTC: 1DgS5RfHw7xA82Yxa5BtgZL65ngwSk6bmm
ETH: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
BAT: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino