Wikipedia Drama and its Spergs (Vandals, Sockpuppeteers, etc) - Long Term Abuse and Arbitration Committee pages, Major Gamergate Battleground

[Oliver D Smith]

MarkofKri (Oliver D. Smith) is fixated with trying to claim that his accounts belong to others:

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/rationalwiki.14720/page-56#post-1265751

http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=009350

http://forum.mind-energy.net/forum/...dia-by-so-called-skeptics?p=240796#post240796

http://wikipediasucks.boards.net/thread/245/

Yet everyone sees through his tricks:

http://forum.mind-energy.net/forum/...dia-by-so-called-skeptics?p=240799#post240799

http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=009350;p=1#000011

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...forum&oldid=1168699#Trolling_by_.22Forests.22

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/rationalwiki.14720/page-56#post-1265760

Oliver can't handle his past accounts and actions being linked together and associated with his identity, so he denies, denies, denies. Nothing offends Oliver more than his own past, so he relentlessly seeks to avoid it. Yet the truth will always exist:

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Oliver_D._Smith/Connecting_the_dots

All Michaeldsuarez does is link to loads of different accounts from different forums then say they're mine with no evidence. He's a goofy detective having tried to dig up my internet history and failed, so all he can do is invent falsehoods about me. Bizarrely he's also saying I was a sysop on Rationalwiki in 2012; everyone knows I wasn't.

He's a self-confessed "prankster" - so this is his method of trolling me. He follows me around forums and sites spamming his own lies (yes, those libellous ED links are his own creations too, almost no one else has edited those pages). He tried to spam the above on Wikipediaocracy, but even they removed it and told him to get a life.

 

[Michaeldsuarez]

All Michaeldsuarez does is link to loads of different accounts from different forums then say they're mine with no evidence. He's a goofy detective having tried to dig up my internet history and failed, so all he can do is invent falsehoods about me. Bizarrely he's also saying I was a sysop on Rationalwiki in 2012; everyone knows I wasn't.

He's a self-confessed "prankster" - so this is his method of trolling me. He follows me around forums and sites spamming his own lies (yes, those libellous ED links are his own creations too, almost no one else has edited those pages). He tried to spam the above on Wikipediaocracy, but even they removed it and told him to get a life.

Oliver is once again trying to run from his past. He was a sysop on RationalWiki in 2012. Oliver was operating the DinoCrisis account, which was granted sysop privileges in 2012:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=rights&page=User:DinoCrisis

Connecting Oliver to DinoCrisis is fairly simple, although the amount of accounts involved means that it takes a bit of time and space to explain:

Spoiler

Oliver was pyramidologist at The Apricity. He expressed an interest in a very specific Army Men 3D-related issue:

http://archive.md/Mnyty

And an interest in British Israelism:

http://archive.md/87XmE#63%

http://archive.md/FekXn#83%

http://archive.md/ul8GM#53%

Oliver expressed the same interests at Wikipedia using IP address 86.10.119.131:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Army_Men&diff=325822782

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Army_Men&diff=365455277&oldid=354047428

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=343063232&oldid=341827235

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=344502525&oldid=343103331

The IP address was later blocked as a sockpuppet of Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:86.10.119.131

Oliver edited RationalWiki from the exact same IP address (86.10.119.131):

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.10.119.131

And when Oliver were asked to create an account, he created the DinoCrisis account within hours:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.10.119.131&diff=1049898

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=newusers&page=User:DinoCrisis

Oliver used the DinoCrisis account to finish the work he started as 86.10.119.131:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_A._Davison&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Milton&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_A._Davison&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Rhawn_Joseph&dir=prev&limit=21&action=history

Later, Oliver created the Boglin account:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:Boglin

Five minutes later, Oliver welcomed the Boglin account with his DinoCrisis account:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boglin&diff=1053990

This is the first and only time DinoCrisis welcomed an account onto RationalWiki:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...s&contribs=user&target=DinoCrisis&namespace=3

As Boglin, Oliver created an article on one of his online opponents from EgyptSearch, Egmond Codfried:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Egmond_Codfried&diff=1054761

And then bragged about it at EgyptSearch, using his Anglo_Pyramidologist account (later renamed to Thule, but quotes of Thule's posts show that the account was named "Anglo_Pyramidologist" at the time ("Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist")):

http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=007359

Oliver would later return to the "Egmond Codfried" article as Krom and Schizophrenic:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Egmond_Codfried&offset=&limit=500&action=history

Oliver later used his Boglin and DinoCrisis accounts to attack Doug Weller:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=patrol&page=Douglas_Weller

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Douglas_Weller&diff=1067519

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Douglas_Weller&diff=1067531

The article was deleted from RationalWiki, but Oliver recreated the article at Metapedia, using his Atlantid account:

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Douglas_Weller

And attempted to use that article to win a debate against Weller at Wikipedia, using his Onion_hotdog account:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roger_Pearson_(anthropologist)&diff=507558212

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...trators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=507591397

Oliver also rewrote Metapedia's "British Israelism" article as Atlantid:

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=273012&oldid=224628

Oliver also created a (now delated) article on Doug Weller and tried to frame Rhawn Joseph for it:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dougweller&diff=1069629

Oliver, as DinoCrisis, identifies himself as the creator of Rhawn Joseph's RationalWiki article in that message to Doug Weller, and since the "Rhawn Joseph" article was created by 86.10.119.131, it means that DinoCrisis is admitting to being 86.10.119.131 and, by extension, Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver Smith).

Oliver was also Forests at RationalWiki. The Forests account began its editing career by defending and updating an article created by DinoCrisis:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_C._Landon&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_C._Landon&action=history

As Forests, he even identified his Email address as dino_crisis@outlook.com:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Prince_Emmanuel&diff=1180820&oldid=1180628

A similar Email address slip-up caused RationalWiki's Forests account and Wikipedia's Fodor_Fan account to be exposed as being operated by the same person (Oliver):

http://forum.mind-energy.net/forum/...dia-by-so-called-skeptics?p=240799#post240799

The Fodor Fan and DinoCrisis accounts even retired and claimed to be moving to New Zealand within an hour of each other:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fodor_Fan&diff=569651282

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DinoCrisis&diff=1226799

The first revisions Oliver made with the Fodor_Fan account were to the Nandor Fodor article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nandor_Fodor&diff=507530546&oldid=497660604

But that was the first time Oliver submitted those revisions to the article. Oliver attempted to make those exact same revisions months earlier using his GreenUniverse account:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nandor_Fodor&diff=494798966&oldid=459504523

The GreenUniverse account was banned as a sockpuppet of BookWorm44:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:GreenUniverse

And BookWorm44 was later found to be the same person as Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...ikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BookWorm44

I haven't published any lies or libel. Getting Google to remove pages from its search result is rather easy. They're simply not interested in hiring a private investigator to look into the online history of people such like you.

 

[Mikemikev]

All Michaeldsuarez does is link to loads of different accounts from different forums then say they're mine with no evidence.

It's fucking hilarious how obvious your socks are. Do you really not know this? A fucking amateur could match the styles. That's evidence in itself dipshit.

:

Spoiler

Oliver was pyramidologist at The Apricity. He expressed an interest in a very specific Army Men 3D-related issue:

http://archive.md/Mnyty

And an interest in British Israelism:

http://archive.md/87XmE#63%

http://archive.md/FekXn#83%

http://archive.md/ul8GM#53%

Oliver expressed the same interests at Wikipedia using IP address 86.10.119.131:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Army_Men&diff=325822782

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Army_Men&diff=365455277&oldid=354047428

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=343063232&oldid=341827235

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=344502525&oldid=343103331

The IP address was later blocked as a sockpuppet of Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:86.10.119.131

Oliver edited RationalWiki from the exact same IP address (86.10.119.131):

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.10.119.131

And when Oliver were asked to create an account, he created the DinoCrisis account within hours:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.10.119.131&diff=1049898

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=newusers&page=UserinoCrisis

Oliver used the DinoCrisis account to finish the work he started as 86.10.119.131:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_A._Davison&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Milton&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_A._Davison&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Rhawn_Joseph&dir=prev&limit=21&action=history

Later, Oliver created the Boglin account:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:Boglin

Five minutes later, Oliver welcomed the Boglin account with his DinoCrisis account:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boglin&diff=1053990

This is the first and only time DinoCrisis welcomed an account onto RationalWiki:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?&title=Specialontributions&contribs=user&target=DinoCrisis&namespace=3

As Boglin, Oliver created an article on one of his online opponents from EgyptSearch, Egmond Codfried:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Egmond_Codfried&diff=1054761

And then bragged about it at EgyptSearch, using his Anglo_Pyramidologist account (later renamed to Thule, but quotes of Thule's posts show that the account was named "Anglo_Pyramidologist" at the time ("Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist")):

http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=007359

Oliver would later return to the "Egmond Codfried" article as Krom and Schizophrenic:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Egmond_Codfried&offset=&limit=500&action=history

Oliver later used his Boglin and DinoCrisis accounts to attack Doug Weller:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=patrol&page=Douglas_Weller

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Douglas_Weller&diff=1067519

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Douglas_Weller&diff=1067531

The article was deleted from RationalWiki, but Oliver recreated the article at Metapedia, using his Atlantid account:

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Douglas_Weller

And attempted to use that article to win a debate against Weller at Wikipedia, using his Onion_hotdog account:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roger_Pearson_(anthropologist)&diff=507558212

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=507591397

Oliver also rewrote Metapedia's "British Israelism" article as Atlantid:

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=273012&oldid=224628

Oliver also created a (now delated) article on Doug Weller and tried to frame Rhawn Joseph for it:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dougweller&diff=1069629

Oliver, as DinoCrisis, identifies himself as the creator of Rhawn Joseph's RationalWiki article in that message to Doug Weller, and since the "Rhawn Joseph" article was created by 86.10.119.131, it means that DinoCrisis is admitting to being 86.10.119.131 and, by extension, Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver Smith).

Oliver was also Forests at RationalWiki. The Forests account began its editing career by defending and updating an article created by DinoCrisis:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_C._Landon&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_C._Landon&action=history

As Forests, he even identified his Email address as dino_crisis@outlook.com:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talkrince_Emmanuel&diff=1180820&oldid=1180628

A similar Email address slip-up caused RationalWiki's Forests account and Wikipedia's Fodor_Fan account to be exposed as being operated by the same person (Oliver):

http://forum.mind-energy.net/forum/...dia-by-so-called-skeptics?p=240799#post240799

The Fodor Fan and DinoCrisis accounts even retired and claimed to be moving to New Zealand within an hour of each other:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fodor_Fan&diff=569651282

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DinoCrisis&diff=1226799

The first revisions Oliver made with the Fodor_Fan account were to the Nandor Fodor article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nandor_Fodor&diff=507530546&oldid=497660604

But that was the first time Oliver submitted those revisions to the article. Oliver attempted to make those exact same revisions months earlier using his GreenUniverse account:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nandor_Fodor&diff=494798966&oldid=459504523

The GreenUniverse account was banned as a sockpuppet of BookWorm44:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:GreenUniverse

And BookWorm44 was later found to be the same person as Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BookWorm44

.

Lol, good work.

 

[Michaeldsuarez]

Lol, good work.

Thanks.

 

[loyalmoonie]

This is loyalmoonie from Wikipedia.
Boaxy brought this on himself by not cooperating when he was told to stop being a baby. But then again, it's a darn shame it had to end with him being banned from editing Wikipedia altogether. I tried to reason with him one time, but he just continued acting immature until he got what he wanted and never followed the consensus in the first place.

And if he's on this forum (or if he's seeing this from his reddit) and tries to correct me in another post, then I will not acknowledge it because Boaxy started this in the first place by making a personal attack against me when I respectfully disagreed with an edit he was trying to make to the main Sailor Moon article's talk page in September 2015. Had he not attacked me (or other users) last year on the Sailor Moon fiasco, things probably would've been different today.

 

[A Random]

What's his deal supposed to be, anyway? He hates that the series page doesn't have a bunch of LGBT promotion or what?

 

[DykesDykesChina]

It's actually quite amusing to read through the edit wars surrounding a certain American village.

 

[loyalmoonie]

What's his deal supposed to be, anyway? He hates that the series page doesn't have a bunch of LGBT promotion or what?

Boaxy added those categories to the Sailor Moon articles on the sole basis that "five main protagonists who each have their own articles are LGBT." When he says that, I assume he is referring to the five inner Guardians (Moon, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter & Venus), which clearly, they are not LGBT-oriented. The only LGBT characters that Naoko Takeuchi (creator of Sailor Moon) ever purposefully wrote were Sailors Uranus & Neptune. Yet, during the time that the 90's anime was being made, during the times that Takeuchi had no say in the anime story, some of the people at Toei Animation tried to add or change certain characters' sexualities (i.e., Kunzite & Zoisite, Sailor Starlights), which Takeuchi herself did not like, period.

So, even if those five minor characters are LGBT in some shape or form, however, those characters do not necessarily dictate that Sailor Moon is themed or targeted towards an LGBT audience because the series is geared towards feminism and female empowerment than LGBT empowerment. Plus, even when LGBT characters do appear, however, they do not stay on the series 90% of time; only for a story arc or a few episodes.

As a result of the above, many editors (including myself) disagreed with Boaxy's interpretation of the categories and opposed his addition. Unfortunately, Boaxy refused to accept no for an answer and attacked other editors for what he defines as "homophobia" and "discrimination" because he didn't get what he wanted, and continued to be pushy because he wanted Wikipedia to be "politically correct."

Currently, Boaxy stands banned from the site for continuing to make personal attacks against me and refusing to follow consensus or stop edit warring. I also had caught him socking on the site, which led to him really getting the boot.

 

[loyalmoonie]

Also, Boaxy likes to claim that I started all this, but in reality, I didn't start this problem. HE started this himself when he attacked me here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sailor_Moon&oldid=670644789

He attacked me in the first place, and he got himself a dose of karma for his actions.
As my fiancee would probably say, "payback's a mother."

 

[Adamska]

I enjoy honeypot threads like these... just sayin'.

 

[loyalmoonie]

I enjoy honeypot threads like these... just sayin'.

Well, what I'm saying is the truth, but I appreciate you're enjoying this discussion.

 

[Adamska]

I'm just waiting for the guy to steam on into here like a few of our other wikispergs and argue it back and poison the well, because they think it'll ignore the fact they were too broken to edit wikipedia. Sorry for the misunderstanding; after going through the three way grudge match by our local stooges here I half expect these types of things.

 

[loyalmoonie]

I'm just waiting for the guy to steam on into here like a few of our other wikispergs and argue it back and poison the well, because they think it'll ignore the fact they were too broken to edit wikipedia. Sorry for the misunderstanding; after going through the three way grudge match by our local stooges here I half expect these types of things.

I don't know what to think of this, but there is a strong chance he might see this whole discussion. Nonetheless, what he says doesn't bother me because what he says about me is not true. As for him trying to argue it back into his favor, he tried that on Reddit when another person made a post about my reporting him for his conduct on Unfinished Business (2015 film). He tried to blame me for that, but I had nothing to do with that post.

 

[Brandobaris]

Holy shit, someone is trying to fix the GG article in good faith, I wonder if this guy has a death wish? This is gonna be hilarious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gamergate_controversy#Let.27s_get_real

 

[CatParty]

Holy shit, someone is trying to fix the GG article in good faith, I wonder if this guy has a death wish? This is gonna be hilarious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gamergate_controversy#Let.27s_get_real

View attachment 128999

Lol this guy taking gamergate seriously

 

[crownthefempire]

I find it hilarious that anyone can accuse Wikipedia of being homophobic or anything like that, given how far down the left side of the horseshoe the "impartial" site has been in my experience.

My last ever visit there in good faith was when I was banned for a month for violating a topic ban I didn't know I had (apparently because I got 3 day banned right at the start of GG back when it was just the Quinnspiracy for trying to add a cited link about ZQ's boyfriend's allegations. Of course, that ban was from Ryulong. The warning I got about a topic ban was a template copy and paste that referred to some argument about some castles in France or something, which makes the ban hold no water IMO) merely by pointing out on the GG talk page that as a transgender bi woman (yes, a real one, not a transtrender) my mere existence proves the claim on the article about NotYourShield being a bunch of sockpuppets wrong.

No, I'm not linking you any of that shit, it was over a year ago and also I'm not doxxing myself with literally my first post here.

 

[Adamska]

But you're doing such a fabulous job.

 

[AnOminous]

I find it hilarious that anyone can accuse Wikipedia of being homophobic or anything like that, given how far down the left side of the horseshoe the "impartial" site has been in my experience.

My last ever visit there in good faith was when I was banned for a month for violating a topic ban I didn't know I had (apparently because I got 3 day banned right at the start of GG back when it was just the Quinnspiracy for trying to add a cited link about ZQ's boyfriend's allegations. Of course, that ban was from Ryulong.

Lol. The resolution of every arbcom dispute ever involves topic banning the biggest spastics on either side and then things go on as usual. You were one of the biggest spastics.

But yes, there's always one of the biggest spastics on the arbcom or elsewhere who gets away with total murder for a while until they, themselves, get the axe.

Wikipedia politics is basically an autistic Game of Thrones except with no actual rewards for the winners.

Also, you do realize, don't you, that anyone who really wanted to dox you could look through those edit records you talked about and probably identify someone who got banned for the edit you specifically mention you made, right?

 

[crownthefempire]

Lol. The resolution of every arbcom dispute ever involves topic banning the biggest spastics on either side and then things go on as usual. You were one of the biggest spastics.

But yes, there's always one of the biggest spastics on the arbcom or elsewhere who gets away with total murder for a while until they, themselves, get the axe.

Wikipedia politics is basically an autistic Game of Thrones except with no actual rewards for the winners.

Also, you do realize, don't you, that anyone who really wanted to dox you could look through those edit records you talked about and probably identify someone who got banned for the edit you specifically mention you made, right?

I wouldn't say I'm the biggest spaz considering literally my entire involvement in GG was those 2 edits that got me banned twice, and occasionally browsing twitter or Reddit with a bowl of popcorn in hand.

I mean, if someone wanted to trudge through the probably 5000 edits to that talk page since then to find out who I am.... you'd still be SOL, because I'm serious, the person who blocked me deleted the revision that got me blocked. I'm just like... you know whenever a cop kills someone and the bodycam footage "goes missing" and gives BLM the perfect ammo to stink up the joint?

I even checked the Arbcom pages, I wasn't named in anything to do with the Arbcom case, and no ruling there even remotely puts into place anything that should have gotten me a block.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

Oliver is once again trying to run from his past. He was a sysop on RationalWiki in 2012. Oliver was operating the DinoCrisis account, which was granted sysop privileges in 2012:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=rights&page=UserinoCrisis

Connecting Oliver to DinoCrisis is fairly simple, although the amount of accounts involved means that it takes a bit of time and space to explain:

Spoiler

Oliver was pyramidologist at The Apricity. He expressed an interest in a very specific Army Men 3D-related issue:

http://archive.md/Mnyty

And an interest in British Israelism:

http://archive.md/87XmE#63%

http://archive.md/FekXn#83%

http://archive.md/ul8GM#53%

Oliver expressed the same interests at Wikipedia using IP address 86.10.119.131:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Army_Men&diff=325822782

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Army_Men&diff=365455277&oldid=354047428

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=343063232&oldid=341827235

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=344502525&oldid=343103331

The IP address was later blocked as a sockpuppet of Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:86.10.119.131

Oliver edited RationalWiki from the exact same IP address (86.10.119.131):

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.10.119.131

And when Oliver were asked to create an account, he created the DinoCrisis account within hours:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.10.119.131&diff=1049898

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=newusers&page=UserinoCrisis

Oliver used the DinoCrisis account to finish the work he started as 86.10.119.131:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_A._Davison&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Milton&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_A._Davison&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Rhawn_Joseph&dir=prev&limit=21&action=history

Later, Oliver created the Boglin account:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:Boglin

Five minutes later, Oliver welcomed the Boglin account with his DinoCrisis account:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Boglin&diff=1053990

This is the first and only time DinoCrisis welcomed an account onto RationalWiki:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?&title=Specialontributions&contribs=user&target=DinoCrisis&namespace=3

As Boglin, Oliver created an article on one of his online opponents from EgyptSearch, Egmond Codfried:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Egmond_Codfried&diff=1054761

And then bragged about it at EgyptSearch, using his Anglo_Pyramidologist account (later renamed to Thule, but quotes of Thule's posts show that the account was named "Anglo_Pyramidologist" at the time ("Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist")):

http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=007359

Oliver would later return to the "Egmond Codfried" article as Krom and Schizophrenic:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Egmond_Codfried&offset=&limit=500&action=history

Oliver later used his Boglin and DinoCrisis accounts to attack Doug Weller:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=patrol&page=Douglas_Weller

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Douglas_Weller&diff=1067519

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Douglas_Weller&diff=1067531

The article was deleted from RationalWiki, but Oliver recreated the article at Metapedia, using his Atlantid account:

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Douglas_Weller

And attempted to use that article to win a debate against Weller at Wikipedia, using his Onion_hotdog account:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roger_Pearson_(anthropologist)&diff=507558212

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=507591397

Oliver also rewrote Metapedia's "British Israelism" article as Atlantid:

http://en.metapedia.org/m/index.php?title=British_Israelism&diff=273012&oldid=224628

Oliver also created a (now delated) article on Doug Weller and tried to frame Rhawn Joseph for it:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dougweller&diff=1069629

Oliver, as DinoCrisis, identifies himself as the creator of Rhawn Joseph's RationalWiki article in that message to Doug Weller, and since the "Rhawn Joseph" article was created by 86.10.119.131, it means that DinoCrisis is admitting to being 86.10.119.131 and, by extension, Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver Smith).

Oliver was also Forests at RationalWiki. The Forests account began its editing career by defending and updating an article created by DinoCrisis:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_C._Landon&action=history

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=John_C._Landon&action=history

As Forests, he even identified his Email address as dino_crisis@outlook.com:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talkrince_Emmanuel&diff=1180820&oldid=1180628

A similar Email address slip-up caused RationalWiki's Forests account and Wikipedia's Fodor_Fan account to be exposed as being operated by the same person (Oliver):

http://forum.mind-energy.net/forum/...dia-by-so-called-skeptics?p=240799#post240799

The Fodor Fan and DinoCrisis accounts even retired and claimed to be moving to New Zealand within an hour of each other:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fodor_Fan&diff=569651282

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DinoCrisis&diff=1226799

The first revisions Oliver made with the Fodor_Fan account were to the Nandor Fodor article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nandor_Fodor&diff=507530546&oldid=497660604

But that was the first time Oliver submitted those revisions to the article. Oliver attempted to make those exact same revisions months earlier using his GreenUniverse account:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nandor_Fodor&diff=494798966&oldid=459504523

The GreenUniverse account was banned as a sockpuppet of BookWorm44:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:GreenUniverse

And BookWorm44 was later found to be the same person as Anglo_Pyramidologist (Oliver):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BookWorm44

I haven't published any lies or libel. Getting Google to remove pages from its search result is rather easy. They're simply not interested in hiring a private investigator to look into the online history of people such like you.

I don't own these accounts. I think you should get a life and stop trolling this forum posting lies about me.

It's fucking hilarious how obvious your socks are. Do you really not know this? A fucking amateur could match the styles. That's evidence in itself dipshit.



Lol, good work.

My socks are obvious when they have tens of thousands of Wikipedia edits on topics I know nothing about, nor am interested in? Genius.