Wikipedia Drama and its Spergs (Vandals, Sockpuppeteers, etc) - Long Term Abuse and Arbitration Committee pages, Major Gamergate Battleground

[Ilikeoreos]

There was also some infamous vandal awhile back named Grawp, a Harry Potter sperg who got into some type of shit with the WP admins and spent years vandalizing the website; apparently he even got kicked off of ED for being too much of a sperg, no idea if he's still around or not but I vaguely remember hearing something about him:

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Grawp

Grawp is the same user as JaraxkeArtemis, who has his own Long Term Abuse page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/JarlaxleArtemis

His second Request for Arbitration page is pure gold:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/JarlaxleArtemis_2

 

[behavior]

I submitted this on the other wikipedia thread but it looks like this thread is more appropriate. There is a racist white supremacist alt right university" historical sociologist" Professor from the University of New Brunswick, Ricardo Duchesne who has been going around wikipedia and internet forums for years under various pseudonyms. On wikipedia two of his known accounts are Gun Powder Ma and R3venans and he edited his own wikipedia article. His main contributions to those forums and Wikipedia mainly consist of insulting and belittling non-western civilizations and he got beaten badly in arguments by random anonymous forum posters in many threads.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricardo_Duchesne

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ricardo_Duchesne&offset=&limit=500&action=history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gun_Powder_Ma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/R3venans

Ricardo Duchesne used the same name Gun Powder Ma on the worldhistoria and allempires forum. You need to log in to see his profile but you can search his posts from those forums on google.

http://archive.worldhistoria.com/member_profile.asp?PF=4482

http://www.allempires.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=4482

http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=14428&PN=2

On the Historum forum Duchesne posted as Aetius. You also need to log in to see his profile but you can search his posts from historum on google. His insults against non-white peoples and civilizations go along a hierarchy of Western European > Eastern European > Middle Eastern > East Asian > South Asian.

https://historum.com/threads/alexander-as-great-a-general-as-everyone-thinks.66935/post-1697256

https://historum.com/members/aetius.9452/

Duchesne gave an interview to the white supremacist alt right Red Ice Radio under his real name.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRfCvgPuSZQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxRZDuy5z5Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Efy8MChz0oU

Others on wikipedia and worldhistoria forum could easily tell he was the same person as his other accounts. He used the name Tibet Libre on another forum and was called out because of his easy to spot patterns.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roman_metallurgy/Archive_1#Roman_iron_production_exaggeration

http://archive.worldhistoria.com/why-was-europe-first_topic14829_page6.html

I suspect that Duchesne knows or contacted the wikipedia editors Julian Felsenburgh and William M. Connolley off Wikipedia because they helped edit and protect his biographical article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/William_M._Connolley

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Julian_Felsenburgh

 

[Muh Vagina]

I posted about this guy in the Obscure Laughingstocks thread. His edit wars were insane. He actually threatened to leak somebody's credit history.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/ZAROVE

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ZAROVE

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:^^James^^/evidence

I was unaware of this thread when I posted this in the Dumb Shit on Wikipedia thread.

 

[Japonty]

Perfect image of The Three Stooges:

Michaeldsuarez, Mikemev and Atlantid

Spoiler: nsfw

Michaeldsuarez makes me laugh the most due to his involvement on Encyclopedia Dramatica, he now has his own article on the site and was nominated for Faggot of the Year in 2017.

Before all the drama, as his own article points out, he was on Wikia and Wiki mostly only ever engaging in drama and making edits on talk pages never actually producing articles or contributing to any Wiki project in a meaningful way.

But when he finally did start with Encyclopedia Dramatica articles, the dumbass had the brilliant idea to use his JuniusThaddeus ego which in turn linked back to his real name allowing him to be doxed by Atlantid leading to his sperging out and deleting everything he had made on Encyclopedia a while back.

What's the current situation today with these faggots? Are they still engaging in their little write ups about one another anymore? Or was some truce declared?

 

[#zzz]

Was reading about this in kiwifarms.net/threads/epik-seizes-9chan-us.68698/



I came across GorillaWarfare(Molly White) while looking at the Rob Monster 9chan debacle, turns out he was being smeared in the progressive "news" sphere and Molly was putting together a page on him and epik solely based on huffpo articles and the like. A 14 year veteran of wikipedia and 8 year veteran of Twitter.

A self proclaimed queer feminist, she's involved with curating the pages of 8chan, Gab, Epik, Rob Monster, and Gamergate among others in that sphere. She often comes into conflict with editors that don't share her POV. And since she has the senior position and a fanclub at her back, theres not much she can't get away with.

And if things get a bit too much of her, this 14 year internet veteran can call harassment and the rest of the crew come running.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

Was reading about this in kiwifarms.net/threads/epik-seizes-9chan-us.68698/

View attachment 1261079

I came across GorillaWarfare(Molly White) while looking at the Rob Monster 9chan debacle, turns out he was being smeared in the progressive "news" sphere and Molly was putting together a page on him and epik solely based on huffpo articles and the like. A 14 year veteran of wikipedia and 8 year veteran of Twitter.

A self proclaimed queer feminist, she's involved with curating the pages of 8chan, Gab, Epik, Rob Monster, and Gamergate among others in that sphere. She often comes into conflict with editors that don't share her POV. And since she has the senior position and a fanclub at her back, theres not much she can't get away with.

View attachment 1261272

View attachment 1261113

And if things get a bit too much of her, this 14 year internet veteran can call harassment and the rest of the crew come running.

View attachment 1261155

Sounds like a good argument for a thread about her. There's bound to be stuff buried DEEP within those 14 years of Internet usage.

 

[#zzz]

Sounds like a good argument for a thread about her. There's bound to be stuff buried DEEP within those 14 years of Internet usage.

Her wikipedia talk page is her entire history of drama with other editors, But I did find some interesting tidbits outside wikipedia mentioning her.

She curates the incel page on wikipedia, so apparently they have a beef with her, and seem paranoid shes watching them.

Shes also covered occasionally on r/wikiinaction and they too think shes monitoring them.

anti-wikipedia sites, usually full of banned editors have a bit to say about her too. Though it appears she has scrubbed her past history there, as theres only responses.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

Years ago I use to enjoy editing on Wikipedia for fun/out of boredom. I found out the hard way that the mods/users are such cunts.

I've cited articles and legit quotes from people, I've changed wording because many Wikipedia pages have stupidly contradictory title/paragraph wording and all the my edits were reverted with them giving such bullshit excuses on why it was changed back.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Years ago I use to enjoy editing on Wikipedia for fun/out of boredom. I found out the hard way that the mods/users are such cunts.

I've cited articles and legit quotes from people, I've changed wording because many Wikipedia pages have stupidly contradictory title/paragraph wording and all the my edits were reverted with them giving such bullshit excuses on why it was changed back.

Same here. I have an advanced degree in, and did my thesis on, a particular subject which was wrongly represented in Wikipedia. The original page writer had provided an alleged quote from a book which I happened to own-- a book that had no such quote in it. In fact no book on the subject had that quote in it, it was completely made up. It wasn't even a really controversial subject either, but it was still flat-out wrong.

So I changed the page, and I notified them in the talk page that the original editor was full of shit with my own references from the book and primary source documents to back it up.

It was reverted within a day by the "Wikipedia Feminism Project" with no explanation.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

Same here. I have an advanced degree in, and did my thesis on, a particular subject which was wrongly represented in Wikipedia. The original page writer had provided an alleged quote from a book which I happened to own-- a book that had no such quote in it. In fact no book on the subject had that quote in it, it was completely made up. It wasn't even a really controversial subject either, but it was still flat-out wrong.

So I changed the page, and I notified them in the talk page that the original editor was full of shit with my own references from the book and primary source documents to back it up.

It was reverted within a day by the "Wikipedia Feminism Project" with no explanation.

Apparently for one of my edits, the info was deemed "irrelevant" and "not suited" to the section that I was writing in, despite that same subsection mentioning variations of the same info I tried inserting. Later I also tried re-wording various sentences as they didn't match up with what the subsection was about. Each one was reverted. I wanted to talk to the dude who did this but then I remembered that it's not worth it.

 

[assdick42069]

Her wikipedia talk page is her entire history of drama with other editors, But I did find some interesting tidbits outside wikipedia mentioning her.

She curates the incel page on wikipedia, so apparently they have a beef with her, and seem paranoid shes watching them.
View attachment 1262147

Shes also covered occasionally on r/wikiinaction and they too think shes monitoring them.
View attachment 1262153

anti-wikipedia sites, usually full of banned editors have a bit to say about her too. Though it appears she has scrubbed her past history there, as theres only responses.
View attachment 1262161

She's currently edit warring over using warosu as a source for an article involving a mathematical proof originally posted on /sci/. Apparently primary sources are problematic, but Verge articles about the same thing are totally fine.

She also wrote an article on "The Boogaloo Movement" which is slightly more accurate than Fox's infamous HACKERS ON STEROIDS segment, which to be fair is about as much effort as those fucktards deserve

The more about her I read the more I'm convinced she's Moleman9000 in drag

 

[BlueSpark]

She's either a tranny using some woman's picture without her permission or she's being paid by some activist organisation.

 

[#zzz]

She's either a tranny using some woman's picture without her permission or she's being paid by some activist organisation.

I'm sure all the upper admins are probably paid from a fund that comes from various PR firms for various political persons, celebrities, academics, companies etc etc... I think the Gamergate article exposed how obviously blatant wikipedia is willing to cover for the establishment. And how the establishment hires writers for "reliable" publications that they in turn can be used to cite articles.

The establishment controls the narrative top to bottom. They pay the PR people, they pay the advertising dollars for the articles, they pay the wikipedia editors to choose what is "trustworthy" and whats not.

 

[dickass42069]

She's either a tranny using some woman's picture without her permission or she's being paid by some activist organisation.

Or she's your bog standard terminally online petty tyrant who lives for internet slapfights like pretty much everyone with an account on wikipedia.
There was a famous article years back about how Wikipedia's most active editors are obnoxious pedants who rarely add anything of substance to pages

 

[Lucille Bluth]

I just remembered some of my edits that were rejected.

When pedophile Mary Kay Letourneau aka Mary Katherine Schmitz, divorced her student victim, Vili Fualaau, I decided to edit their Wikipedia pages, and after posting the articles that reported their divorce, some cuck moderator deleted my edits and issued a message to me stating that my "source" was "unreliable". I used some entertainment site.

And what do you know, their Wikipedia pages now cites several entertainment news articles on their divorce.
EDIT: Here's the section on their divorce, and you can see that they also cited entertainment news sites as "sources".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Kay_Letourneau#Release_from_prison_and_marriage_to_Fualaau

I still hate how those mods are so quick to abuse their power and have double standards. I was trying to edit the etymology of a science related word, but my edits were removed and deemed "unreliable". Again, I've also edited other articles that have contradicting headings, but they're always reverted. Meanwhile there are articles riddled with so much sentences that have a "Citation needed" note and convoluted sentences, but no one bothers to edit those out.

 

[Safir]

Or she's your bog standard terminally online petty tyrant who lives for internet slapfights like pretty much everyone with an account on wikipedia.
There was a famous article years back about how Wikipedia's most active editors are obnoxious pedants who rarely add anything of substance to pages

Wikipedia has a long-ass article on "criticism of Wikipedia" consisting of 25 nonspecific points of criticism and 4 specific incidents. *~strangely~*, this particular point is never brought up.

If anyone has the writers vs editors article, please link it.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

There was a famous article years back about how Wikipedia's most active editors are obnoxious pedants who rarely add anything of substance to pages

You'd think that the mods would actually try cleaning up so many pages with sentences saying "Citation needed" or "This Section heavily dependant on one source". Instead, they're always deleting and reverting many articles back to their "normal state".

I forgot the exact article because it was years ago, but I got into an argument with some mod/editor/whatever when I was trying to improve this section on Wikipedia. It had something to do with Asia, but for some reason, the article only talked about East Asia. I tried including more sections on other parts of Asia, but they kept reverting my edits. When I messaged one of the people, I showed them Wikipedia's Own List of countries that were part of "Asia".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Asian_countries_by_population

But nothing happened, my edits were still rejected.

I think this may have caused them to do something to my account (like banning or restricting my account). because my edits which "went live" automatically (even on semi protected ages), were only visible when I logged onto my account.

Meanwhile they keep sections like this, even though there's a note stating it doesn't have a "neutral" stance, but those mods/editors are so quick to revert changes to many other pages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A1mi_people#Discrimination_against_the_S%C3%A1mi

 

[assdick42069]

You'd think that the mods would actually try cleaning up so many pages with sentences saying "Citation needed" or "This Section heavily dependant on one source". Instead, they're always deleting and reverting many articles back to their "normal state".

One involves clicking a button, the other involves actual work that takes away from their busy schedule of posting on twitter and making edit number go up.

My first experience with this was when I edited an article about an unimportant building to remove a section about it being demolished and a different one built in its place. Some editor almost instantly showed up to a page that realistically five people in the whole world might care about, and removed my edit either because it was unsourced or was original research (I forget). They had time to do this but not to click the coordinates at the bottom of the page and clearly see the building was still there.

I appreciate that wikipedia at least archives edits so you can see relevant information that was removed from a page because it wasn't added by a mod or one of their friends.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

I remembered actor Cary Grant's Wikipedia page use to be a battleground because he had no Info box. There's even a "warning" now if you ever try adding an info box there.

The moderators said there was no "consensus" on why his page shouldn't have an info box. Seems pretty stupid that they couldn't reach a "consensus" when most people of enough notoriety has one. Never mind the fact that according to the Wayback Machine, he had always had an info box, at least during the late 2000s, early 2010s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cary_Grant

Here are past archives when his Wiki page had an info box.

https://web.archive.org/web/20110715030025/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cary_Grant

https://web.archive.org/web/20120229053246/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cary_Grant

Cary Grant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

web.archive.org

 

[Lucille Bluth]

One involves clicking a button, the other involves actual work that takes away from their busy schedule of posting on twitter and making edit number go up.

My first experience with this was when I edited an article about an unimportant building to remove a section about it being demolished and a different one built in its place. Some editor almost instantly showed up to a page that realistically five people in the whole world might care about, and removed my edit either because it was unsourced or was original research (I forget). They had time to do this but not to click the coordinates at the bottom of the page and clearly see the building was still there.

I appreciate that wikipedia at least archives edits so you can see relevant information that was removed from a page because it wasn't added by a mod or one of their friends.

Sorry for the very late reply, but I was reminded of your comment when I saw the "Karen (name)" page, which is a battleground where retarded mods revert just about any edit but refuse to get rid of the note that says "Citation needed" when people say its a female given name found in East Asia. And I guess because the name is used as an insult in America now, the page needs to be "protected".

Its one of the only name pages where the users feel the need to divide people with the name by geographical origin. When there are many names found throughout the world with multiple different origins/meanings that don't have their pages set up like this.

EDIT: I saw an edit of the page which made it more orderly and less cluttered, but within like 2 minutes some user reverted everything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_(name)

An archive of the revision:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200907185055/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_(name)