And this asinine bullshit is why, ladies and gentlemen, that we never take wikipedia seriously as a source of information.
Wikipedia has purged Yaniv's article. -
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
Pastel_Ace33
kiwifarms.net
At that point we need to just call it quits and nuke ourselves.
Tbh like someone else mentioned yaniv is probably upset with the purging. It would have been a perfect tool to prove that he was being bullied. And would have used it for scooter discounts and free tampons. But alas something else will come up that will overshadow this wikipedia. Yaniv is gift that keeps on giving just like herpes.
Yaniv as a person isn't even notable enough for a Wikipedia article about him. As someone already mentioned, it would've still made sense to somehow have kept the stuff about the tribunal shit
Mainly because that Wikipedia is biased and woke.
wikipedia was created and funded with jimmy whales porn sites money, weird they turned into troon sjw patrols
Sure.Infamy needs to be archived, so that future generations can learn from our mistakes.
Kiwi Farms - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Just not Yaniv's.
Agreed. Considering how many times he tried to create and author an article on himself there should not be one with his name on it. There should, however, be an entry on the (extra)legal cases along with any proceedings against him which may still arise.
No one wants to know about Yaniv except autists like us, and we know where to go to get that information. Normies, however, should have quick and easy access to information on the things he's done.
While I feel his degeneracy should not be buried, I’m having a lol at the fat nonce for losing his precious article. He wants attention and power so badly and I bet he was chuffed at being on THE WIKIPEDIA. Now he’s a nobody again.
Actually. If you make an article on Wikipedia that's obviously about yourself, you can expect it to be taken down sooner or later due to it being against some guidelines/concensus/what-so-ever
Imagine it's something to do with impartiality standards.
It'd be hilarious to lift that restriction on someone like Yaniv just to see how much outlandish bullshit he comes up with to add to his own article over the course of a month.
I actually think it's to avoid the article being too partial and biased. That would go against what actually defines an informative way of writing an article
Troutsmacked
kiwifarms.net
I can't find an archive of his main article, but here is an archive of the deleted page on the Jessica Yaniv genital waxing case...
deletionpedia.org
But what's actually more interesting is this Wikipedia page someone made of him while he was still going by Jonathan Yaniv, that was deleted way back in 2015:
deletionpedia.org
Jessica Yaniv genital waxing case - Deletionpedia.org
But what's actually more interesting is this Wikipedia page someone made of him while he was still going by Jonathan Yaniv, that was deleted way back in 2015:
Jonathan Yaniv - Deletionpedia.org
Munchma Quchi
kiwifarms.net
I can't find an archive of his main article, but here is an archive of the deleted page on the Jessica Yaniv genital waxing case...
Jessica Yaniv genital waxing case - Deletionpedia.org
But what's actually more interesting is this Wikipedia page someone made of him while he was still going by Jonathan Yaniv, that was deleted way back in 2015:
Jonathan Yaniv - Deletionpedia.org
He's like one of those flat fish that spends it's life lying sideways on the ocean floor. We can just see the beginning of the one eye migrating here.
When he's 50 years old he's gonna have a face like Peppa Pig.
Imagine a troon crusading so hard, that it reached the point that he made other trannies feel miserable about themselves.
That implies he even lives long enough to turn 50
It's everyone and everything.
Wikipedia is intentionally designed as a bureaucratic nightmare so that only the most austistic of humans will have their voices heard. Considering the rate of autism among trans people, it's no surprise that they dominate the direction of the discussion. Enjoy this brief screenshot of the endless redtaping of redtape that makes up the bedrock of Wikipedia. http://archive.md/fJmZD
I see words. Many words. Make them stop.
It might be intriguing for someone to look into the administrator who suppressed the article on the waxing case.
If you look at their earliest 'contributions', they very clearly are not a new user, but come in as someone familiar with WP policies and dumb shit like welcoming new Wikipedophiles to Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...butions/Randykitty&dir=prev&target=Randykitty
Apparently some critics have suggested that this particular Wikipedo may be Jeffrey Beall, a librarian who created a list of journals that pajeets publish articles in so they can pretend to have peer-reviewed publications. It may or may not be true, but looking at the edit history it seems very likely they are a librarian. As a librarian they are probably autistic, and thus pro-troon.
If you look at their earliest 'contributions', they very clearly are not a new user, but come in as someone familiar with WP policies and dumb shit like welcoming new Wikipedophiles to Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...butions/Randykitty&dir=prev&target=Randykitty
Apparently some critics have suggested that this particular Wikipedo may be Jeffrey Beall, a librarian who created a list of journals that pajeets publish articles in so they can pretend to have peer-reviewed publications. It may or may not be true, but looking at the edit history it seems very likely they are a librarian. As a librarian they are probably autistic, and thus pro-troon.
Similar threads
Father of the Sexual Revolution [Historical Perspective]
Like have you really seen this?
Long Term Abuse and Arbitration Committee pages, Major Gamergate Battleground
