Artcow William D Pearson / WillM3luvTrains / TrainmanWP / TimmyTurnerFan / WillTheArthurandBusterFan5050 / BusterAndCarlRulz5050 - Train sperg with a pedophilic piss fetish

Piga Dgrifm

Pita Griffin
True & Honest Fan
(I brought this guy up in the dA horrors thread, and think that he may have some potential.)


WillM3luvTrains (Real name; William) is a thirty year old aspie with an obsession for railroad crossings;
Screen Shot 2016-02-01 at 10.42.51 AM.png

This is a picture of two railroad crossings, or two pictures in one of two railroad crossings (or if you want, it can be the same crossing, just updated.)

Anyway, in the picture, I have a crossing with flashing lights and bells, and a crossing with flashing lights, bells, and gates.

Both crossings illustrated are good crossings, at least to certain degrees since in all reality, all sorts of railroad crossings are dangerous, some more than others. But anyway, these are good crossings because both crossings are equipped with active and automatic warning devices, i.e. flashing lights and bells as mentioned.

However, the top crossing just has flashing lights and bells. It is a good crossing because it warns motorists (drivers), pedestrians, and bicyclists of an approaching train and signals anyone approaching the crossing to stop. Since it has active and automatic warning devices, the lights for visual warning and bells for audible warning, this is a good crossing.

The bottom crossing has flashing lights, bells, and crossing gates that go down and block traffic, which makes it a better crossing. The lights and bells not only warn that a train is coming but also warn that the gates are about to come down.

Admittedly, while crossing gates warn of an approaching train as do the flashing lights and bells, they were not made to stop cars. It is, therefore, the motorist's bicyclists, and pedestrian's decision as to whether or not to obey or disregard the activated warning devices in place. Usually crossing gates in place are ignored when people race underneath them or drive around them, and sadly, sometimes, motorists crash right through them, which I really do not like, although crossing gates are replaceable.

If the gated crossing isn't better than the gateless crossing by fact, and admittedly gated crossings are just as passable as gateless crossings since people can just easily ram through them, which I don't condone, but the gateless crossing is good in my opinion because it at least has flashing lights, and a bell, although I do like crossings with lights but no bells and prefer those over crossings with bells but no lights. I also like these kinds of crossing signals best. The gated crossing is better in my opinion, for looks, and they provide better warning, especially at multi-track crossings where second trains can come. I mean a crossing with lights and no gates on a multi-track crossing is good, but some drivers can immediately cross the tracks after one train passes even with the lights still flashing only to get hit by another train, and many crossings in the U.S. and other countries are equipped with forward and rear-facing lights instead of just forward-facing lights. Crossing gates can tell you better if another train is coming or not, usually. If a train has passed but the gates do not go back up, it usually means another train is on the way, but sometimes it can mean the signals are malfunctioning. At one track crossings it's not much of a problem because usually when one train passes on this type of crossing, there is no other train coming, but at a multi-track crossing where a second train is likely to come, if a someone walks through a crossing or drives around a gates while they're still down after a train has passed, that could be the last thing they ever do. I also like to have something between myself and the train, or between a stopped car and a train, that being the gate.

This picture, especially the top picture, was inspired by an instruction sheet I got when I ordered an ATLAS HO Scale crossing signal off of eBay and it talked about the automatic crossing flasher and how highway crossings were protected by flagmen, which I'm assuming are humans that guarded crossings. It also says that rising costs and shrinking profits called for the adoption of automatic signals, except at heavily trafficed crossings near rail terminals and yards, and at the time this instruction sheet was made, it was said that heavily trafficed crossings near terminals and yards were still presided over by watchmen. This was written back in 1962 mind you.

It goes on to say that seldom used branch lines and spurs, and crossings of little dirt country roads, rarely featured more than just the old familiar crossbuck ( X-shaped RAILROAD CROSSING sign) on a post, but a majority of the highway crossings were protected by what they call the A.R.A. flasher, after which the HO scale crossing signal, and the signals in my drawing, have been patterned. (Source Atlas Tool Co. Inc., Hillside N.J. 1962) If you also have the ATLAS crossing signals, you probably know what I mean already. I think though the ATLAS crossing signals are out of production so if you want them, you're best off getting them off of eBay if they're available.

Also in use were those wigwag signals with those swinging round banners, which resembled human flagmen, and I don't know when they stopped installing them but somewhere along the line, the crossing signals we see today became necessary. I do like the wigwags, especially the cantilever-type wigwags, but not half as much as I like the flashing light signals.

Bottom line, I like the crossing signals without gates and prefer them over all else, but I like the gated crossings better. I also do like gated crossings without lights but they're not as exciting, although I'm still having trouble deciding between a crossing with lights and a crossing with gates.

I also chose to make the gates with vertical stripes rather than diagonally striped gates due to new M.U.T.C.D. (Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) standards… and I made the gates red and white, though I could have made them black and white or black and yellow, but red and white is more me and it's more modern.
As well as various children's cartoons (most notable being the Fairly Oddparents and Arthur.) He enjoys inserting his pregnancy fetish into Fairly Oddparents;

Also, I know male fairies on Fairly Odd Parents get pregnant but I do not like that at all and am totally against it. I cannot stand the sight or the thought of male pregnancy, including fairies. I will instead be doing artwork of female fairy pregnancy, for myself and for anyone who wants to see pictures of Wanda and other female fairies pregnant, and those against male fairy pregnancy and I don't care what anyone says about it. Well actually I do, I don't like to sound haughty or prideful, that's wrong, I do care but I will not be swayed by what people say about female fairy pregnancy.

I really hated Fairly Odd Baby and that Cosmo gave birth, that disturbed me very much, I regret watching that movie and I never want to see it again and I want no support in it. I don't care if male fairies get pregnant, well I do but I cannot control what happens on Fairly Odd Parents, but I can control what I put in my fan-art and fanfics and I will NOT draw pictures of male fairies or other male creatures, not even sea-horses, being pregnant, as natural as that is. If you want male fairy pregnancy, you're going to have to get it from someone else.
Screen Shot 2016-02-01 at 10.46.02 AM.png

His dA account features numerous images of Josh Spitz, a character from some cartoon called Braceface, whom he seems to have some sort of pedophilloic obsession with.

And for the fun of it, I like to call Josh Joshua, I mean isn't that what Josh is short for? Then again, maybe his name is just Josh, I mean I know a person who's name is just Dan, not short for Daniel, just Dan. And to be more creative, I gave Josh a few nicknames, two of them are Chauncy (or maybe it should be spelled "Chauncey,") and Orville. Now I'm having him go by Joshua Chauncey Orville Spitz.

In very early 2005, I became way more interested in Josh.
In addition to dA, he also has a account;
Numerous wikia accounts;
And a Wrongplanet account;

He also seems to believe he can use the word of Jaysus to avoid being trolled.

One more thing, please try not to take it personal if you wrote a story for me or have a story you would like me to read and I refuse to read it. If your story contains content I'm not comfortable reading whether because of my Scripture-based beliefs or because of psychological issues or whatever, I will not read it. I may even give you a reason why I didn't read it but I will try to do so in the nicest, kindest possible, but firm, way. And I'll try to only talk if you ask me why I didn't read it, otherwise I'm going to try to practice and exercise "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," and I've learned I don't have to be very chatty every single time about some things.

Know this though, I don't leave flames. I don't like flames anymore than any of you do, and will not enjoy them when I receive them and they may be subject to removal or report and you may be subject to block, but I will not leave flames. I'm trying to go by the saying "Say nice things or say nothing at all." If you read the Scriptures like I do, I'm trying to exercise what Jesus Christ said in Matthew 7:12 and Luke 6:31, "Treat others the way you want to be treated." It's not worded that way in either verse but the message is the same. So if I don't like a story for whatever the reason or if I find it offensive, I'll just stop reading the story and leave and will not leave you a review or, especially if asked, I'll kindly give a reason why I couldn't finish reading a story but I will NOT flame anyone, it's rude and disrespectful of me to do, but I may give some constructive criticism even though that's not an easy thing for me to do.

And like I said, I do not want to get into any confrontations with anybody. And if you flame me or yell at me in anyway, I will not talk to you, I WILLIGNORE YOU and disregard your message unless I have a reason to speak and I will speak as nicely as I can, otherwise don't expect to hear anything from me if you're rude and disrespectful. If you are rude, but then apologize, I'll try to accept your apology and forgive you, I shouldn't hold a grudge against anyone, and I hope your apology is genuine and true, or I may think twice before talking with you or interacting with you again.
Born July 3, 1985, in Gary, Indiana. Lives in Tucson, Arizona.
Last edited by a moderator:


Domo Arigato
Hey guys, have you ever wanted to read about the Arthur characters being stuck at a railroad crossing? Well, here's nearly 2,000 words about exactly that!
It's like he's channeling himself through Buster, and that's creepy. And dumb.

Why do autists love trains so much?
Because of Thomas the Tank Engine? Fuck if I know the "intricate workings" of a trainsperg.