Much like the phrase "Nero fiddled whilst Rome burned" shows a bias against him because fiddles didn't even exist then. settle down Master Millerthe historiographical material on caligula is notoriously quite biased.
it is likely that he had mental problems but not at the levels described.
The horse thing for example was just a stunt to fuck with the senate.
Yeah, right. there is no biography of Nero that is completely reliable or that was not written by a supporter of the senate. He was cruel but not necessarily more than any absolute monarch of the time, and realistically he's probably only lost his mind in the last few years.Much like the phrase "Nero fiddled whilst Rome burned" shows a bias against him because fiddles didn't even exist then. settle down Master Miller
I think the term was to describe more the fact while rome burned he did jack shit but hung around his manor outside of rome. not actually played a violin while rome burned.Much like the phrase "Nero fiddled whilst Rome burned" shows a bias against him because fiddles didn't even exist then. settle down Master Miller
True, Caligula was not even verified on Twitter.TBH, he seems pretty tame compared to the current load of troons and their SJW Enablers
Dude sounds chad AF. This thread is insulting.So I'm bored and watching some historical documentaries, on my day off, and It occured to me as I watching a documentary on caligula, he could probably not only be insane, but a lolcow of his day.
As to why:
1. He had an incestous relationship with his sister to the point he lmao when she died he made her an official roman godess.
2. he married a pregnant woman and named the baby from that after his sister
3. he had a long standing war with posiden god of the sea.
4. he was a degenerate.
but idk, if it where the times, idk could he be a lolcow if such an indivdual existed in modern times?
also what other historical figures would be considered lolcows or fit the lolcow definition?
I feel like you’d have an easier time listing Roman emperors that WERENT cows.
Aside from good old Caligula you had terminal drama queen Nero, who made a castrated boy his wife. He named him after his ex-wife who he is alleged to have kicked to death himself.
The number of the beast 666 was meant to have been derived from Nero’s name so he gets edgelord cow points too.
Even Julius Caesar, arguably one of the biggest chads of ye olden times, had some cow tendencies with his massive ego.
There’s also Elagabalus the proto-troon that I recommend reading up on in your free timeHistory is fun
I think this could be said about a lot of famous people like Rasputin.So I'm bored and watching some historical documentaries, on my day off, and It occured to me as I watching a documentary on caligula, he could probably not only be insane, but a lolcow of his day.
As to why:
1. He had an incestous relationship with his sister to the point he lmao when she died he made her an official roman godess.
2. he married a pregnant woman and named the baby from that after his sister
3. he had a long standing war with posiden god of the sea.
4. he was a degenerate.
but idk, if it where the times, idk could he be a lolcow if such an indivdual existed in modern times?
also what other historical figures would be considered lolcows or fit the lolcow definition?
Caligula was a respected and successful leader the senate just hated him so they slandered him this libel was picked up by christian-centric historiansSo I'm bored and watching some historical documentaries, on my day off, and It occured to me as I watching a documentary on caligula, he could probably not only be insane, but a lolcow of his day.
As to why:
1. He had an incestous relationship with his sister to the point he lmao when she died he made her an official roman godess.
2. he married a pregnant woman and named the baby from that after his sister
3. he had a long standing war with posiden god of the sea.
4. he was a degenerate.
but idk, if it where the times, idk could he be a lolcow if such an indivdual existed in modern times?
also what other historical figures would be considered lolcows or fit the lolcow definition?
And how do we know what sort of a person Caligula really was, if our only sources are from biased individuals?Caligula was a respected and successful leader the senate just hated him so they slandered him this libel was picked up by christian-centric historians
1:normal by roman emperor standers
2:not even abnormal by modern standers
3: its called trolling
4:about average by roman emperor standers
people claimed to be related to Caligula to garner prestige that wouldn't happen if he was a retard
He riled people up so much that they stabbed him, that's the opposite of a fail troll.he may qualify less as a lolcow and more as a fail troll to the highest degree given he eventually got stabbed for his antics.
Also Claudius for being so damn stupid that he, according to Suetonius: “when he had put Messalina to death, he asked shortly after taking his place at the table why the empress did not come.”