Would mandatory six month maternity leave have negative effects? -

  • Intermittent Denial of Service attack is causing downtime. Looks like a kiddie 5 min rental. Waiting on a response from upstream.

bruhidfk12345

kiwifarms.net
I just finished a video that had a similar topic, and it’s made me kind of wonder. For example, in Japan, it’s not uncommon at all for women to be asked if they’re planning to get married and have kids in job interviews, and to then be denied said job because they said yes. Or to be outright excluded from the applicant pool just because employers assume they’ll eventually have kids, which means leaving work, sometimes never to return.

Now, obviously there’s no way in hell employers could get away with something that outright here, but it does make me wonder if they would try to do something similar, just in a more under the table fashion. Like maybe only hiring certain types of women?

For example, I feel like first time mothers who want to return to work could face serious problems. One quick social media check, and that’s all it takes for a potential employer to assume they’re probably going to have another child in the somewhat near future, and toss their application into the trash.

I also feel like it might just make things more difficult for women in the 25-35 age range in general. Those typically are the most common childbearing years, and potential employers would absolutely take note of that. Especially if they’re married, but at the moment childless.

Don’t get me wrong, I think the state of maternity leave in this country is ridiculous, but at the same time I’m also worried about the potential effects introducing mandatory extended maternity leave could have on women trying to get into workforce.
 

Whatdidyousay?

kiwifarms.net
It's done elsewhere in the world. Perhaps not quite as long. It wont work in the us however because this country cant agree on anything other than orange man bad or Democrats are pedos.

This is what happens when you give every fucker the ability to vote. South Africa gave away the vote that went real well.

It would have to be subsidized, in which case it just becomes yet another way of paying minorities to reproduce. If businesses were expected to shoulder the burden it would either kill small businesses or make women unemployable, depending on the implementation.
No it wouldn't. Why is the us any different to the rest of the world?
 

BoingoTango

Sabat on a gayops
kiwifarms.net
what is needed is mandatory unpaid maternity leave for 12 years tbh
putting women to work is an absolute catastrophe that is slowly driving our people towards extinction

I mostly agree with you. Women totally should be able to work whatever job they want to, IF they want to. It shouldn't be a necessity for both parents to work 40 hours a week so that the state/random babysitters and daycares raise children. Women were only put to work because of a crisis, but as governments are want to do, instead of retracting shit after a crisis, they keep it going to take every advantage they can out of it.
 

Curious Addie

kiwifarms.net
No it wouldn't. Why is the us any different to the rest of the world?
I bet the countries that have implemented this overly generous maternity leave either have few minorities or unsustainably high taxes. The US has a roaring economy even with 30% of the population serving as dead weight. In a homogenous society, policies that encourage maternity would foster healthy population growth. In the US, such policies overly favor minorities, who have much higher fertility rates than whites and consume far more government subsidies on a per capita basis.
 
A

AF 802

Guest
kiwifarms.net
I mostly agree with you. Women totally should be able to work whatever job they want to, IF they want to. It shouldn't be a necessity for both parents to work 40 hours a week so that the state/random babysitters and daycares raise children. Women were only put to work because of a crisis, but as governments are want to do, instead of retracting shit after a crisis, they keep it going to take every advantage they can out of it.

So, we should practice eugenics so women can gb2kitchen in the near future?
 

Y2K Baby

The Codex of Ultimate Wisdom???
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I bet the countries that have implemented this overly generous maternity leave either have few minorities or unsustainably high taxes. The US has a roaring economy even with 30% of the population serving as dead weight. In a homogenous society, policies that encourage maternity would foster healthy population growth. In the US, such policies overly favor minorities, who have much higher fertility rates than whites and consume far more government subsidies on a per capita basis.
Very informed viewpoint.
 

Maggots on a Train v2

new and improved account
kiwifarms.net
Like most greedy social justice things, it would just fuck people over even more. I don't know what they expect businesses that operate on a real budget to do. Cut everybody's pay so they can hire a temp worker? Dump all the work onto the other employees so they never see their own families again?

Every single workplace would become a "hostile work environment" to every woman under 40, even the HuffPo-type places that exclusively hire women. The childless and menopausal women would have flames shooting out of their eyes. They would spend all day finding PC reasons to pick apart and shred everything ever done by a fecund employee.:jaceknife: It would breed nuclear SJWs.
 
V

VV 422

Guest
kiwifarms.net
"mandatory women's maternity leave" is a terrible idea
"mandatory: women leave maternity" is much better. artificial wombs when
 

Similar threads

Those with connections to the Second Battle of Fallujah discuss the Middle East in media and mistrust of the US military, and ask who the game will actually ask players to empathize with.
Replies
51
Views
5K
Top