How come? That's amazingly inaccurate. The only legit way you could say that a hypothetical alt-right person is "definitely hiding something" is if the overwhelming majority of alt-right people are hiding something. This is obviously not the case. If the majority of alt-right people were gay, or furries, or ABDL, then assuming that a random, hypothetical alt-right person is any of these things would have merit. But that's not the case.Lol the hypothetical alt-right brother is definitely hiding something, alt-right spergs always are. He's a furry, or an ABDL, or he's in love with his football coach or something.
Again, the only way that could be true is if most SJW were only having a "phase", which is not the case. Most SJWs remain SJWs throughout their lives. So it is safe to assume that a random SJW sister would also remain an SJW. At least that's the most likely outcome based on how most SJWs behave.Meanwhile the sjw sister is probably just an edgy straight girl who'll grow out of it in a few years. Even if she doesn't, she probably doesn't repress her gross weird shit like your hypothetical alt-right brother.
You basically reversed the data. Yes, some alt-right people are gay and project by being homophobic. But most are not like that. Therefore, it is safe to say that a random alt-right person has better chances of not being gay, or otherwise degenerative.
Likewise, there are some SJWs that are straight, and stop being SJWs once they grow out of it. But these are the exception. Most SJWs remain so.
Remember, we are talking about probabilities, nothing more.
edit: I now see the source of confusion. I should have pointed out that an alt-right brother is more likely to be straight, and that he could be gay.