Came here hoping to see yaniv was being sent to jail to be raped by TERFS and all I see is weird Canadian sperg drama.
Nothing new hereCame here hoping to see yaniv was being sent to jail to be raped by TERFS and all I see is weird Canadian sperg drama.
It's most definitely called "Disability" in BC, although if he's getting benefits through an employer, he might insist on calling it "LTD" instead. That seems unlikely since he'd need to have held a job first.
Maybe he's on welfare.
If he's on disability it will be the basic government cheque. Most Canadians don't have corporate style disability insurance. Most important medical stuff is covered already by universal healthcare. But even of those that do, Yaniv isn't one.I can't imagine he's had sustained corporate employment long enough to still be on Long term...although a smaller company might have caved to his oppression stack and not bothered cutting him off. He could also have some form of LTD on a private insurance plan (like through his own business?)
My guess is he's actually full time employed by that stupid marketing company and he "works from home". The women in whatever office are thrilled hes not around and so no one makes a big deal out of the fact that his "workday" is social media posting and the odd purchase of bots.
I've worked with people who cost so much money when they showed up that I can see this being viable.
To be fair, you have no idea what dealing with these people on a day-to-day basis is like. They are constantly shit talking the US while simultaneously refusing to take any responsibility for the extremely fucked up things that are happening in our country. Things that lead to situations like Yaniv suing women for not waxing his balls. It gets really irritating. What makes it anger inducing is when they act so smug on top of it.
Four prohibited weapons. Four. What a maroon.
To add to this, it’s important to remember that this doesn’t just end at weapons or devices with a very specific and singular utility (a collapsible baton has one and only one purpose). Everyday mundane objects fall under this perspective as well.
Example: you carry a baseball bat in your trunk, which is discovered during a traffic stop. If the bat is accompanied by some balls, a mitt, a team jersey, and you play in a local softball league, then you’re totally fine. If however, it is suspected that you carry a bat for no reason other than self defence, you can technically be charged with possession of a weapon.
Honestly, I would be very VERY surprised if Yaniv is not at least charged with weapons offences. People have seen the inside of a cell for MUCH less.
As a side note, purchasing a "tire bat" at a truckstop also sidesteps the "need to have a ball and glove in the trunk" routine with the cops, but only if it says on the side that's it's purpose; that's how truckers get away with having the things. Other options include a lacrosse or hockey stick and a tennis ball, or a golf club and practice ball.
On the other hand, at no time in the many threads here has JY demonstrated anything resembling the athleticism required to clean up after themselves, let alone justify having any kind of sporting goods in his trunk.
Technically three: bear spray's legal unless you use it on a human.Four prohibited weapons. Four. What a maroon.
How likely is it that Yaniv would stumble upon a bear though? If his intention was to use it on humans would that change the legal grounds for having it?Technically three: bear spray's legal unless you use it on a human.
He displayed clear and threatening intent to use the pepper spray on a human, in the elevator of a public government building, at his last BC HRT hearing. It may have been an idle threat, until the RCMP found that he possesed the weapon that he was clearly prepared to use. And they have all of this on video. There are numerous instances of Yaniv threatening and bullying people with these weapons, including the two instances on camera, and one I believe in the HRT hearing room. (Didn’t he threaten to taser somebody?) we’re well past lawful possession for fending off wildlife.
How likely is it that Yaniv would stumble upon a bear though? If his intention was to use it on humans would that change the legal grounds for having it?
Four prohibited weapons. Four. What a maroon.
To add to this, it’s important to remember that this doesn’t just end at weapons or devices with a very specific and singular utility (a collapsible baton has one and only one purpose). Everyday mundane objects fall under this perspective as well.
As a side note, purchasing a "tire bat" at a truckstop also sidesteps the "need to have a ball and glove in the trunk" routine with the cops, but only if it says on the side that's it's purpose; that's how truckers get away with having the things.
Thanks that's what I thought but wanted to be sure because I'm not familiar with the area of Canada he lives in. So he would get charged for possession of four weapons.As someone said earlier on, aside from prohibited weapons (things that very very few individuals can own) the laws are based less on the weapon and more on intent. A mechanic carrying a tire iron around his yard is not suspicious and perfectly legal. But if you have a tire iron in your backpack as you walk through a mall, you’ll get in shit.
Yaniv has shown zero interest in any wilderness or outdoors activities, so owning bear spray is absolutely ludicrous and a very transparent attempt at getting access to a weapon outside its stated purpose. So to answer your question, yes, it makes a huge difference.
Go get a job in a restaurant and carry around a huge bag of knives no problem.This is why, especially if you live somewhere with idiotic weapons laws, you never buy dumb mall ninja shit with no use other than as a weapon. Just have stuff with completely legitimate uses. It helps to have an actual job where you have to have certain things.
How likely is it that Yaniv would stumble upon a bear though? If his intention was to use it on humans would that change the legal grounds for having it?