Yaniv v Elections Canada -

[DrRockzosNose]

Twitter/Archive

Spoiler: Spoiler

Man, fat boy is thinking he can make some fat stacks of cash off the cucked leaf government. Have any of you Leafs heard of the federal government being taken to the BCHRT or any HRT before?

 

[Teazel]

I'm surprised Scheer and Bernier aren't running ads "This man pretending to be a woman is voting for a white candidate who wears blackface. If you don't want to be dumb cuck, vote for us." Or something. Though I don't know how Canadian elections work.

 

[A Pare A Teeth]

It probably was some 17 year old who needs to volunteer to graduate who didn't really listen and wanted to add a check to the list of numbers called.

And I’m wondering if this particular employee had a specific accent...

Jon is so very easily ’triggered’ poor didums

Money, money, money, moooooney...

Aww @wabbits why are you discriminating against muh rights

 

[wabbits]

Yaniv's next complaint: Game Stop for allowing [edit: Delete key failure]

Aww @wabbits why are you discriminating against muh rights

View attachment 958144

Sorry to leave you with Bieber, but we need all the R&B we've got down here or Rebecca Black will kill us all (on Friday, Friday, on Friday, Friday).

 

[Teazel]

Yaniv's next complaint: Game Stop for allowing

Allowing what? Brown people to work there? Side-eyeing him ("IT'S MA'AM")? Existing at all?

 

[Kiwi Lime Pie]

Looks like Yaniv has filed a new BCHRT complaint and this time it is against @ElectionsCan_E for an employee supposedly misgendering him as Sir.

The thing is, women with deep voices are often mistaken for men. Similarly, men with higher-pitched voices can get mistaken for women. In addition, immigrants who have yet to learn the common names in their new country sometimes associate the wrong gender with a name -- especially when the initial contact is over the phone. It gets more confusing with shortened forms such as "Jess" or "Pat" where the person could be either male or female.

Many times, the people that unknowingly use the wrong gender are apologetic when corrected; other times, they stay with the wrongly assumed gender and keep using it despite their being corrected. But this is more out of cluelessness or ignorance than malice. The guys that get called "ma'am" or ladies that get called "sir" in these instances know it's usually not done with bad intentions and they learn to shrug it off without getting unnecessarily worked up over it.

For now, I'm going to doubt that Yaniv was purposely misgendered until there's definitive proof of it -- especially if for some reason there are still voter rolls that list "Jonathan Yaniv." I get the impression Yaniv was all too eager to treat this alleged misgendering as yet another triggering microaggression when a simple, "My name is Jessica; I'm a female," would have sufficed and given the other person a chance to apologize and correctly address Yaniv moving forward. Instead, Yaniv treats every slight -- even if it's inadvertent and has nothing to do with their being transgendered -- as the worst possible anti-trans hate crime that deserves nothing less than the harshest possible punishment at the hands of a human rights tribunal.

 

[A Pare A Teeth]

For now, I'm going to doubt that Yaniv was purposely misgendered until there's definitive proof of it -- especially if for some reason there are still voter rolls that list "Jonathan Yaniv."

Like still having his ‘deadname’ on his business records.... and if the voter rolls used this info., unlike mamma Yaniv who told the BCHRT that Jonathan was a girls name, the rest of the world would read this as male.

https://mobile.twitter.com/yanivconspiracy/status/1178759020334796802 / Archive


This tweet is from Oct. 1st and Jon was on this thread. See....

https://mobile.twitter.com/trustednerd/status/1178763977590886400 / Archive

Doesn’t he need to delete himself now? Or is he already a literal murderer and literally erased already?

 

[wabbits]

Everybody needs to hit Yaniv with that special form of "maaay'am" with the drawn-out first syllable that conveys utter contempt.

 

[The Fifth Waltz]

I just want Jagmeet Singh (a Sikh) to win because the lolz we'd get from Yaniv would be amazing.

 

[Womanhorse]

I wonder if Yaniv only called them up to start shit because you really dont have to call them up if you need to update your voter registration. As long as you provide legal ID online or in person at a local Elections Canada Office you have your voter information updated. Plus Voter ID cards (you need to present this in order to vote up here and you only get 1 per election) are sent out automatically in the mail so unless he was changing his name on that he had absolutely no good reasom to call up beyond harrassing some poor call center employee over pronouns and throwing a hissy fit over it

 

[TotallyAChick]

At this point, anything Yaniv does is getting filed in the "Wackshit I saw on the internet" folder in my head.

It's like he wants to sue his entire nation.

Well, he should be ready to sue the whole world, because it's not like all kiwis are from Canada. Hell, he should establish his own country and go to war with everyone. Fucking hell Jessica.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

Imagine getting to Yaniv’s age and spending your days looking to be misgendered for attention. How awful that must be.

 

[Christ Cried]

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if businesses started pre-maturely blocking his number to avoid contact.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

Fuck me, now I need to learn the intricacies of another Canadian government department!? This shit is starting to feel like work.

I actually find the Canadian Human Rights tribunal system pretty fascinating. I mean it's a fucking disaster as Yaniv is ably demonstrating, but the reasons for it being a disaster are actually pretty interesting.

It's almost like only the US has a somewhat sane approach to human rights. Canada, the UK, and other 'Queentarded' countries to use a Kiwism seem to have two possibilities

1) The government shits all over the people and there's nothing they can do about it

or

2) The human rights tribunals are abused by bad actors to shit all over people, and there's nothing they can do about it.

The troon occupation government of Canada will cuck hard.

TOG really needs to replace ZOG because saying ZOG makes you sound like you're a fucking lunatic. I mean I am a fucking lunatic but I feel tipping people off by using ZOG is bad. It's better that they get to the end of the post and realize that from my policy proposals, which are mostly highly malicious.

 

[Yanivs Mutilated Cock]

All of his reviews on BBB state "Jonathon was great" etc... none of them say Jessica. I wonder why.

 

[RubDemTendies]

Twitter/Archive

Spoiler: Spoiler

View attachment 958109

Man, fat boy is thinking he can make some fat stacks of cash off the cucked leaf government. Have any of you Leafs heard of the federal government being taken to the BCHRT or any HRT before?

You better be an Native-American High Chief or Elder to pull those kind of shenanigans against the Federal Gov. and they typically are speaking on behalf of an entire reserve/tribe. Never heard of an fat upset idiot being able to take them to court because some underpaid intern misgendered them on a phone.

 

[Figger Nucker]

You better be an Native-American High Chief or Elder to pull those kind of shenanigans against the Federal Gov. and they typically are speaking on behalf of an entire reserve/tribe. Never heard of an fat upset idiot being able to take them to court because some underpaid intern misgendered them on a phone.

You're in for a treat, you might get to hear a first.

 

[The Un-Clit]

The thing is, women with deep voices are often mistaken for men. Similarly, men with higher-pitched voices can get mistaken for women. In addition, immigrants who have yet to learn the common names in their new country sometimes associate the wrong gender with a name -- especially when the initial contact is over the phone. It gets more confusing with shortened forms such as "Jess" or "Pat" where the person could be either male or female.

Many times, the people that unknowingly use the wrong gender are apologetic when corrected; other times, they stay with the wrongly assumed gender and keep using it despite their being corrected. But this is more out of cluelessness or ignorance than malice. The guys that get called "ma'am" or ladies that get called "sir" in these instances know it's usually not done with bad intentions and they learn to shrug it off without getting unnecessarily worked up over it.

For now, I'm going to doubt that Yaniv was purposely misgendered until there's definitive proof of it -- especially if for some reason there are still voter rolls that list "Jonathan Yaniv." I get the impression Yaniv was all too eager to treat this alleged misgendering as yet another triggering microaggression when a simple, "My name is Jessica; I'm a female," would have sufficed and given the other person a chance to apologize and correctly address Yaniv moving forward. Instead, Yaniv treats every slight -- even if it's inadvertent and has nothing to do with their being transgendered -- as the worst possible anti-trans hate crime that deserves nothing less than the harshest possible punishment at the hands of a human rights tribunal.

I like to think that this is how the pretrial conference will go: "Okay, so call centre agent Balbir Singh addressed you as 'sir' when speaking to you, correct? Did you give the agent the opportunity to correct himself by informing him that you are (herk herk) a female and sir is not an appropriate way to address you?" "No? Why not?" "Case dismissed".

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

I like to think that this is how the pretrial conference will go: "Okay, so call centre agent Balbir Singh addressed you as 'sir' when speaking to you, correct? Did you give the agent the opportunity to correct himself by informing him that you are (herk herk) a female and sir is not an appropriate way to address you?" "No? Why not?" "Case dismissed".

Someone needs to make a BCHRT complaint against Yaniv for his racism towards Sikhs. Basically, if he calls you, he's probably going to go after you for misgendering. Troll him as much as possible in the hope that he'll say something racist and then nail him with a complaint. If you look at the only case where costs went against him to date it was because he did that.

Taking bets for Jonathan's fate

Allow me to shill my own admittedly pessimistic and bleak prediction based on the case of Luka Magnotta TLDR yaniv gets pathologically addicted to the negative attention and infamy he gets from the media and keeps escalating his antics to ever more obscene and disturbing lows until he straight...

kiwifarms.net

[58]Second, in my view, JY does not come to this issue with clean hands. This is a relevant consideration in respect of an application for costs because of the discretionary nature of the award and its punitive purpose. In that regard, the Tribunal has held that “a party seeking such costs should not expect a favourable result if the party’s own hands are not clean”: Reekie v. International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 400 (No. 4), 2006 BCHRT 242 at para. 10; see also Gibbons v. Abbotsford Chrysler and Chiang, 2009 BCHRT 381 at para. 18; Mint Tanning at para. 42.

[59] In an attempt to make a point of her own, JY has made frequent reference and derogatory assumptions about the “culture” of Laser Cut’s legal counsel, Mr. Randhawa. She begins by arguing that Laser Cut’s conduct was tantamount to her “purposefully profiling Mr. Randhawa and attacking his culture, and his looks to committing crimes that are well known from that culture in the City of Surrey, such as the rampant gang shootings and then saying he did do that” [as written]. She then goes on, throughout her submissions, to make frequent reference to Mr. Randhawa’s “culture” being one that is “very conservative” and where certain topics are not discussed. She asserts that “the majority of people in Surrey unfortunately are unproficient in English and do not possess customers service skills”. Such comments, in my view, draw on racial and cultural stereotypes that have no place in this Tribunal’s process. Just as JY should not have to endure being misgendered, Mr. Randhawa should not have to endure irrelevant personal judgment statements derived from stereotype.

[60] In short, I agree with JY that Laser Cut’s conduct in referring to her using male pronouns was improper. However, I do not find that conduct warrants an order of costs because it has been rectified and because JY has engaged in similar conduct herself.

 

[What This Old Thing!?]

Here is a flyer being printed and posted using Yaniv as a case against Trudeau's C-16.

Home - We the Females

We the Females Asserting the rights of biological women ACT NOW Current Action Action #08 – Write a Letter to the Editor Write a Letter to the Editor of Your Local Newspaper About Bill S-202 Mainstream media continues to shirk their responsibility to inform the public of what transgender...

wethefemales.com

Archive tried and failed several attempts

Spoiler: Portion of flyer

Is Justin Trudeau really a feminist?
Or will history prove that his government passed the most
damaging legislation for women and girls EVER.
Our Liberal government has embarked upon a social engineering program with far reaching
implications. We invite you to become informed and decide for yourselves.
What is Bill C-16?
Bill C-16 came into effect in 2017. It adds “gender identity and gender expression” to the
Canadian Human Rights Act and The Criminal Code.
So what?
Bill C-16 allows self-identification, which encodes into law the ability for any man to declare
himself a woman and access women’s protected spaces. No physical changes are required.
Examples of protected spaces include female public washrooms, female changing facilities,
female prisons, rape crisis centres, and women’s shelters. It also includes the right to compete
as a female in women’s sporting events.
Why didn’t I know this before?
Bill C-16 was sold as legislation that would protect transgender people from discrimination. And
don’t get us wrong, those are good intentions. However, the impact of the bill is quickly
destroying the rights of women and girls. We believe the rights of women and children must
be balanced with the rights of transgendered individuals.
Since Bill C-16 came into effect, the most scandalous example of this law’s negative impact on
women is the Jessica Yaniv case. Yaniv is a biological male who has successfully taken 16
female estheticians to court for declining to wax his scrotum. Yaniv claimed that his rights
as a woman were violated because female waxing services should be available to all “females”,
including those with male anatomy.
Canadian mainstream media has remained largely silent about this case, failing to inform
Canadians on why Yaniv is able to use the new legislation to his advantage with no regard for
the safety of women. Social media also censors discussion about this topic. Journalist
Meghan Murphy was removed from Twitter for using the pronoun “he” when referring to Yaniv.

Yaniv is like turning nuclear waste into bunker busters.

Edit: this is the wrong thread for this post. Not sure where it should go.