What was it like going to a majority black school?
Your reason for hating blacks? - Actual valid reasons. Powerleveling included.
- Thread starter polyqueerandrosensual
- Start date
Not @BayView , like posting.
You see the video of the lovely ladies twerking on the ambulance?
It's the kind of shit where unless you saw it with your own eyes, you would think I was making shit up.
Which is to say it SUCKED. OUT LOUD.
SpookNuker
kiwifarms.net
Many reasons. Pick one. Pick a reason to dislike someone and that's probably a thing that niggers frequently do. Pick a disgusting behavior and chances are it is a habitual behavior shared by most niggers. At very least they keep us entertained with their tomchimpery in videos like this
lol this fucking nigger. Typical
lol this fucking nigger. Typical
I knew a girl whose Romanian father was a legit rocket scientist.
Romanians =/= Romani/Gypsies
Kermit Jizz
kiwifarms.net
13/50 and other similar stats.
I'm sure every gun that was fired was by a legally owned and fully licensed operator.
Only 24 hours in a day, not enough to for all that hate. I just plain don't care anymore. No time commitment required for apathy.
Pimpleking55
kiwifarms.net
I dont hate blacks, i only hate niggers.
Willie Thrills
kiwifarms.net
It's way higher in the UK, visible from the census shit. They use 2011 data after shipping in several million over the last decade. I have met a handful of blacks who lived in the UK before 2011 - the rest are almost entirely recent arrivals. If those numbers line up, the UK is around 7-8% black, now, in ten years. Most blacks in the UK arrived in the last ten years.
Blacks are more dangerous - statistically, black men are more likely to be murderers than any other demographic - this is a simple fact.
Even fifty years ago, at the height of the Troubles, the murder rate in the worst-hit areas of the UK, where paramilitaries openly engaged in gunfights with state forces and eachother, shooting down helicopters, firing RPGs against armoured vehicles - all of this brought the fatality/murder rate to the level of Kansas City. There are five cities in the USA more dangerous than the entirety of Northern Ireland during an actual war.
This isn't even unique - the ongoing war in Donbas brought the murder rate of Donbas to less than 40. In fucking Donbas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxJ1nWT7QwY
This place was safer than Detroit.
So no, you're lying.
Willie Thrills
kiwifarms.net
Irish Travellers suffer from a strange situation where the British classification and their own classifications differ.
Most tick the "White British" box on censuses, or "White Irish"
This is because most "Travellers" in my experience identify as Irish, in particular, with Northern Ireland, where they lived as a more "normal" lifestyle choice.
Irish Travellers behave this way because many are still in the mindset that the police will torture them if they capture them, which they did, many times. The state obviously has a bit of a bone to pick with Travellers, as Travellers are also, even using the most wide-spanning population metric of "Ethnic Traveller" separate from ethnic Irish, number at 300,000. Using this number, they are identical to Irish-British in almost all criminal prosecution cases, which itself is higher than English until adjusted for income level, where it becomes insignificant.
Except for terrorism-related, where they are probably the highest single ethnic group per capita in the world, given that they were so heavily involved with the IRA.
Using the lower boundary, those who identify publicly on the census as Irish Travellers, at 20,000, this group alone would have contributed hundreds of members to the IRA - even more using the wider 300,000 definition. The difference is in the census details - since Travellers occupy all three Native-UK census slots. Ethnic Irish Travellers are around 300,000 - proper nomadic Travellers only make up around 7% of the total population of "ethnic Travellers"
This is also a major part to why so many Travellers behave as they do - they never really chilled out like the rest of Ireland did. This is also to do with Ulster itself, where many are native to.
The separation in the definitions is somewhat new - historically, Irish Travellers were just considered as one of the Irish lifestyles - some live in villages, some live in cities, some live in caravans and tents. This was the same among all Gaelic groups, by the way, with many living semi-nomadically.
The history of the "ethnic group" if you believe Travellers are a distinct ethnicity is just sad - prior to around the Second World War, they actually had industries which they excelled in, namely horse breeding and showman entertainment - but over the last 80 years, the conditions just got worse and worse. Unlike foreigners, Travellers are distinctly native to the UK and only "separated" recently, with the worst living conditions in the UK throughout the 20th century. This is also why I can't stand blacks who bitch and moan about racism, especially trying to say that they had it bad in the 50s to the 70s. They had houses with running water and electricity in major cities, many had employment opportunities, and similarly Pakis owned small businesses - while at the same time, Travellers were in disgusting poverty, not even "ghetto" poverty, I'm talking absolute, stunted-growth, no-teeth, atleast-one-kid-will-die poverty.
In short, the opposite is true. Travellers lived, and some still live, in completely crippling poverty. Due to some (I suspect, hostile) intervention of bureaucracy and cowardly police officers who are afraid that they may end up in a ditch like so many were during the Troubles, the subset of the population most likely to commit crimes are separated from the rest of the population. I have no idea why that is, it'd be like finding the shittest trailer park you can, circling it and declaring the people in there to be of a different racial group.
TLDR Circling a subset of a far larger ethnic group doesn't suddenly make black crime acceptable. Doing the same to any ethnic group would have the same effect.
I hate niggers because niggers hate being law-abiding, upstanding citizens. It's not hard to be civil in modern society.
Lmao why is it always mutts who try to counter data on niggers with ad-hoc statements about hillbillies (that are and have only ever been a cultural subset of the United States)?
The big joke is that if you press these people on what they think constitutes a hillbilly you get a definition as broad as Vaush's asshole after a session on his favourite rubber horse cock. It's basically meaningless.
I genuinely think that any American that can't tell the difference between a poor farmer in Eastern Europe and an Irish gypsy should just stop talking about race altogether as the only thing they'll ever be able to prove when engaging in discussion about this topic is why the rest of the world thinks Americans are fucking stupid.
Willie Thrills
kiwifarms.net
I have no idea. I went from thinking maybe I didn't "understand" white Americans to being outright offended that somebody would lie so brazenly to my face. Having met a great deal of white Americans, including rednecks, it is clear that these people are just lying and hoping that you'll be stupid enough to fall for it.
It’s just a piss poor cope to boot. The crime rates among middle and upper class blacks are still higher than poor whites. Poor whites also do better in school than upper class blacks with household incomes $250k+ a year. Hillbillies statistically function better than the talented tenth and that’s a factual statement.
Their culture and the coddling that allows it to thrive has destroyed most of the cities around me. Its hard not to just blindly hate them all.
Similar threads
The quietly dangerous threat that's not being talked about
